It is currently 04/11/25 6:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Go to page Previous  1, 2   Page 2 of 2   [ 47 posts ]
Author Message
PostPosted: 12/31/08 11:44 pm • # 26 
I wasn't comparing the Israelis to the Nazi's. My comment about the 'final solution' was in reference to your view that killing is the only way to deal with both Hamas and the Palestinians. I saw it as your 'final solution', not the Israelis. It was you who seemed to want that. I find that people who stop trying to be reasonable and insist that killing is the right and proper response to political problems are usually incapable of veering from that course.

I would hope the Israelis are more thoughtful.

The Israeli's are thoughtful and are trying and have always tried to find peace. Every time an agreement is reached with the Pals, Hamas breaks it. The attempt to kill Israelis is not merely a "political" problem. It's a deadly problem that must be stopped. Israel has tried many ways and many times. I have supported those ways and times even when I think Israel is giving up too much. The final solution was an attempt to wipe a whole group of people off the face of the earth. Neither Israel nor I wish to wipe the Pals off the face of the earth. The final solution line was not nearly an honest or accurate representation of my view. Wipe Hamas off the face of the earth? As long as they remain intent on destroying Israel, you betcha. Even you said they should be wiped out. I said that thinking the Pals and Israelis could share a country is naive. That doesn't mean wiping them out. It means them having their own country once they decide to stop electing and supporting Hamas and the attacks against Israel. That is hardly a "final solution" as you used the term. Until then, Israel has a right to defend herself and some "innocent" Pals will be killed because they let Hamas use them and Israel defends herself. I don't call attacks on Israel a "political problem".

Actually, I haven't said that Israel shouldn't retaliate. I could care less how you take my words. You haven't impressed me with your hyperbole about 'Israel forever'. Slogans are nice, but they accomplish nothing. Israel gets nowhere by killing a few Hamas leaders and also hundreds of innocent men, women and children. That's been my point for years. You create a larger problem by doing that. Bombing hungry people isn't something that instills a reverence for democracy.

You can call me anti-semitic if you want to, but I am not and it only makes you look like you are struggling to make a point. I've dealt with other supporters of Israel who believe anyone who isn't all for the killing is a "jew-hater". It's an old tactic.

Israel has a right to defend herself. She's being attacked. She is attacking back. She kept the peace agreement. Hamas started the violence again as they always do. They use civilians so when Israel fights back, some Pals will die. That will continue as long as they let Hamas use them. Israel has to try to stop the terrorists from coming into Israel and keep arms and other terrorists from getting into Gaza. The hunger and death would end if Hamas would stop the attacks and the Pals would stop supporting Hamas and if Hamas wouldn't use the aide trucks boats, etc. Israel has a right to bomb the tunnels and anything else the terrorists use to bring in arms and friends. They can't just allow the attacks. Allowing yourself to be attacked over and over does not help a democracy survive. I know of no one who wants the killing or is for the killing. I am for Israel defending herself. That means when attacked she strikes back. If the Pals and the rest of the world want the killing to stop, they need to stop Hamas and attacks against Israel. They also need to stop blaming the Israelis for their reaction and start blaming the Pals and Hamas for the action that caused it. Israel forever does mean a lot. It means she's not going to just sit back and accept the attacks. The Pals can make peace or they can continue to allow attacks into Israel which will bring deaths to their own people. The choice has been and is now the Pals'.


It also cuts off food, water and medicine. It's giving Israel a black eye, but I think your point is that everyone hates Israel so it doesn't matter what they do. I don't agree with that.

I don't agree with that either and it was not my point. Israel has to be on guard. The Pals know what that means. If they want the blockades to stop they need to seek peace instead of supporting Hamas and the attacks against Israel. Defending herself should not give Israel a black eye. Allowing their children to be hungry and be killed because they hate Israel and allow attacks against Israel, should give the Pals a black eye. All the Pals need to do is stop Hamas.

I don't know you. I have settled on nothing. You are the one who has decided you are an expert on both Israel and me. The 'final solution' shit, as you call it, was my response to your view that killing is Israel's way out. I don't believe that for a second. It's never happened before and I don't expect it will work this time.

I must say, for someone who says I don't have a right to tell you how to post on the board, you have no problem telling me how I should post.

It should be a fun group.

Neither you nor I are experts on Israel. I am not an expert on you. I can only judge by your posts. Attacking back is Israel's way of survival until someone stops Hamas. Again, I say the "final solution" line was not honest or accurate. There will be no peace until the Pals want it. When Israel was attacked from all sides she killed some people in defense. I think that worked. Not firing back certainly wouldn't have worked. The only way to have a "solution" of any kind is for the Pals and everyone else to stop allowing attacks from their territory. Jordan and Egypt did that. There's peace. Israel continues to make offers, Hamas continues to attack. As long as attacks happen, attacking back is necessary. To think otherwise is to say Israel should sit and take it for fear of what the world might think. You did say Israel was thumbing it's nose at the world didn't you? By defending herself? I disagree.





Top
  
PostPosted: 01/01/09 5:34 am • # 27 

The Israeli's are thoughtful and are trying and have always tried to find peace.

I don't find that to be accurate. If that's your view, you might be right about us wasting our time arguing the point. Israel was created out of terrorist actions. It wasn't the arabs who blew up the King David Hotel.

The attempt to kill Israelis is not merely a "political" problem.

Of course not, but it's rooted in a political problem.

It's a deadly problem that must be stopped. Israel has tried many ways and many times. I have supported those ways and times even when I think Israel is giving up too much.

Who has given up the most? Bulldozing people's homes, olive groves, and building illegal settlements doesn't seem like an attempt to give up anything.

The final solution was an attempt to wipe a whole group of people off the face of the earth. Neither Israel nor I wish to wipe the Pals off the face of the earth. The final solution line was not nearly an honest or accurate representation of my view. Wipe Hamas off the face of the earth? As long as they remain intent on destroying Israel, you betcha.

You seem to contradict yourself. You are saying that the Pals need to forget and forgive. I don't think they will. If they don't then your 'you betcha' is the final solution, is it not?

Even you said they should be wiped out.

Actually, I didn't say that. I said that it may be necessary for Israel to remove Hamas and put up with the negative world press, which they will get whether they launch a massive invasion or keep bombing and killing innocents. It's an expedient that I see as having a greater payoff than the bombings. I still believe neither one gets Israel what it needs in the long term. Violence begets violence. If no one breaks the cycle it spirals out of control.

Until then, Israel has a right to defend herself and some "innocent" Pals will be killed because they let Hamas use them and Israel defends herself. I don't call attacks on Israel a "political problem".

That collateral damage (killing and maiming of hundreds of innocents) simply puts more iron into the will of those being killed and maimed. No group of people accepts that kind of violence without reacting in response to it.

Being given someone else's land is a problem. When it's done with the backing of the UN (read Western powers) it's indeed a political problem, whether you want to call it that or not.

Israel has a right to defend herself. She's being attacked. She is attacking back. She kept the peace agreement. Hamas started the violence again as they always do. They use civilians so when Israel fights back, some Pals will die. That will continue as long as they let Hamas use them. Israel has to try to stop the terrorists from coming into Israel and keep arms and other terrorists from getting into Gaza. The hunger and death would end if Hamas would stop the attacks and the Pals would stop supporting Hamas and if Hamas wouldn't use the aide trucks boats, etc. Israel has a right to bomb the tunnels and anything else the terrorists use to bring in arms and friends. They can't just allow the attacks. Allowing yourself to be attacked over and over does not help a democracy survive. I know of no one who wants the killing or is for the killing. I am for Israel defending herself. That means when attacked she strikes back. If the Pals and the rest of the world want the killing to stop, they need to stop Hamas and attacks against Israel. They also need to stop blaming the Israelis for their reaction and start blaming the Pals and Hamas for the action that caused it. Israel forever does mean a lot. It means she's not going to just sit back and accept the attacks. The Pals can make peace or they can continue to allow attacks into Israel which will bring deaths to their own people. The choice has been and is now the Pals'.

I posted your entire paragraph. There is nothing in there that addresses the root of the problem, which is that Israel was created out of Palestine and displaced Palestinian arabs. That is the root of the problem and will remain the root of the problem.

I expect that usual response which is that Israel now exists and the Pals need to accept that.

I don't think they are ever going to do that. I think the killing will go on and the real question is whether the Israelis eventually wear down the Pals or whether the rest of the arab world decides to take up the cause of the Pals and go to war with Israel.

This has been the usual cycle.

I don't agree with that either and it was not my point. Israel has to be on guard. The Pals know what that means. If they want the blockades to stop they need to seek peace instead of supporting Hamas and the attacks against Israel. Defending herself should not give Israel a black eye. Allowing their children to be hungry and be killed because they hate Israel and allow attacks against Israel, should give the Pals a black eye. All the Pals need to do is stop Hamas.
4th generation warfare, what we call 'wars of insurgency' are like judo in that they use the strength of an opponent against it.

In the 15 major insurgent wars over the last 100 years, only one was won and that was by the British in Malaya. Their opponent put down arms and won at the ballot box.

Neither you nor I are experts on Israel. I am not an expert on you. I can only judge by your posts. Attacking back is Israel's way of survival until someone stops Hamas. Again, I say the "final solution" line was not honest or accurate. There will be no peace until the Pals want it. When Israel was attacked from all sides she killed some people in defense. I think that worked. Not firing back certainly wouldn't have worked. The only way to have a "solution" of any kind is for the Pals and everyone else to stop allowing attacks from their territory. Jordan and Egypt did that. There's peace. Israel continues to make offers, Hamas continues to attack. As long as attacks happen, attacking back is necessary. To think otherwise is to say Israel should sit and take it for fear of what the world might think. You did say Israel was thumbing it's nose at the world didn't you? By defending herself? I disagree.

You don't seem to see this problem from a neutral perspective. Hamas launching unaimed rockets into Israel and creating minimal damage and receiving a massive bombing which kills nearly 400 and wounds 1600 is going to give Israel bad press, which is the point of Hamas actions in the first place.

Israel is well within it's rights to bomb the crap out of Hamas, the people who elected them and pretty much anyone else they want to bomb.

Does that do anything to bring them peace? Does someone have to stop retaliating to make peace or do we get peace from the barrel of a rifle?

My point was that there is war of opinion going on and Israel should be trying to win that. Is it too late for that? I don't know.

Meanwhile, they can massively retaliate against men, women and children penned up in Gaza and hope that brings them peace.

I'm not betting any money on that outcome.









Top
  
PostPosted: 01/01/09 10:58 am • # 28 

Yep, you, Thack, and I have nothing to discuss anymore. You totally support the Pals, poor displaced people. I totally support Israel. It's interesting though that you feel the other countries that displaced Pals and even brutally slaughtered them owe the Pals nothing. In fact, you say that's not relevant. So, your concern is not for the displaced Pals, it's only for those displaced by Israel. I'd love to know how many of the Pals now in Gaza ever had homes in what is now Israel. Shouldn't the effort be to return the Pals to their homes? You just want to force them on Israel.

There were Israeli terrorists. They did bomb the Hotel. They called and warned but the place wasn't evacuated. But, yes they bombed it and killed people. A terrorist act, an unacceptable act. That is not where Israel came from though. Israel had been formed by Jews who had been buying the land around there, by the British mandate, by the displaced Jews immigrating into the land given them. All you ,Thack, see, is the terrorists.

The illegal settlements are wrong and Israel has had to fight it's own people to get them to stop.

Thack, your continued use of the "final solution" in reference to what I say is innacurate, dishonest, offensive and ridiculous. I think maybe you need to go study up on Hitler's final solution before you use the term so lightly.

Where did I say the Pals need to forget and forgive? Who's bringing them death and destruction? Hamas is, Jordan did, Egypt did. They should be angry.

What you say about the Pals and their rights I say about Israel and hers. You see Israel only as stolen land, so stop the pretense of wanting her to survive. Every post you make blames Israel for everything and most actions you support would lead to her destruction.

Most of your post seems to be you once again saying Israel should accept the attacks and do nothing but try playing kissy with the world. The world opinion has been against and unfortunately will remain against Israel because what they see, those who are not just blatantly jew-haters, is stolen land. Most don't give a damn about the Palestinians. Do you think the Arab countries care about Pals? They slaughtered them and exiled them. In the UN, one Jewish State against how many Arab States? How many Muslim countries? The League of Nations taking the territory, the British mandate, etc came about following the WWI. Did the Pals control the land before that? Did the Pals ever control that land? How far back do we want to go? What was to be done with the Jews no one wanted? Seems to me their original homeland was a good place to choose. Israel was not formed from terrorism. It was formed by Jews wanting a homeland, their own, back. They took that by legal means, some terrorism when it appeared the British were about to throw them to the wolves, and by being given it. Yes, they are there and will stay there. The Pals may have better luck trying to get their land back from Jordan. That's where most of them came from. You do realize that right? You act like all the Pals in Gaza came from the land Israel has. They didn't. The Pals were spread all over and were kicked out of every place. Many Arabs live peacefully in Israel. Why? Because they don't support Hamas and attacks against Israel. Could the Pals be trusted to do the same? No way. They prefer to let their babies be martyrs for Hamas.

I don't see the problem from a neutral position? And YOU do? Minimal damage done to Israel? Please do tell how many Israelis have to die and how much damage has to be done before you accept Israel defending herself? The idea should be to prevent those, so I wouldn't wait. The Pals goal should be to prevent deaths and destruction where they are. That would mean get rid of Hamas. It would not mean allowing your babies to be killed because you hate Israel. Hamas wants the babies killed and hungry.

It's true, as long as people only see Israel as illegal and displacing some Pals, there will never be peace. Those people will not be satisfied until Israel is gone.

Israel defends itself with retaliation and the "barrel of a gun". They seek peace through diplomatic efforts. They've given up a lot and put themselves in danger for peace. When the leadership of other countries have cared about their own people enough, peace has come. The Pals can have peace. You and I disagree on the solution. I say the solution is the Pals getting rid of Hamas and having their own country. You want them to have Israel. Who has the most to lose? The Pals. Who decides whether or not there is peace? The Pals. What do they choose instead? Hamas.

No one has to stop retaliating. Hamas has to stop attacking and causing the retaliation. The Pals need to stop supporting Hamas. They can sit and watch their babies be killed and be hungry but that won't bring peace. They show no desire for peace. They want Israel.

I say Israel has a right to be there and will remain there. You say the opposite. We will never agree.

If a person lobbed a mortar into my yard it wouldn't matter if anyone was hurt or not or anything great was damaged. The threat to my friends and family would make me do anything to ensure no more are lobbed. I'm not going to let it continue while I go talk to people who don't like me and don't like the lobbers. You don't threaten my family. If you hire bullies to harass us I will get rid of those bullies to defend my family. If you want to come live next to me in peace even though you don't like me, that's fine. I will use whatever I have to to defend us and I will use diplomatic means to try to stop the violence. It's a two parter. Israel does both, whether you see that or not.

So you see all of this is just wasted words. As long as you see Israel as only the result of terrorism, we will never come close. As long as you see the Pals as only displaced people, instead of people who can control their own future, we will never come close. The Pals could kick out Hamas and work through diplomatic means to get what they want. Ah, but no. Only Israel is supposed to do that. The Pals are supposed to keep making their children martyrs so the world who hates Israel anyway will protest. But, sure. I'M the one whose not neutral.



Top
  
PostPosted: 01/02/09 2:41 am • # 29 
I don't support the Pals. I think the situation is untenable and I wonder how Israel finds a way thru the morass.

The Pals certainly are a displaced people. I don't expect them to do what you want them to do, which is to basically forget the past. That would be nice and might bring a solution, but I think it's a foolish belief.

I think your view is overly simplistic and the 'Israel is always right' aspect makes it pointless to try and discuss the issue.

We are finished. Maybe things will work out better on other topics.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/02/09 4:54 am • # 30 

This is posted to no one in particular. It is from George Washington's farewell address.


"Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and
harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be,
that good policy does not equally enjoin it? . . . . .

"In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that
permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate
attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just
and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which
indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some
degree a slave.

"It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is
sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. . . .

"So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a
variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the
illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common
interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays
the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter
without adequate inducement or justification.

"It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to
others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by
unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting
jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom
equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or
deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to
betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium,
sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous
sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a
laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition,
corruption, or infatuation."



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/02/09 7:46 am • # 31 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Thack, I think I understand your position ~ but on an emotional level, I also see the double standard within your position ~ let's go to bare-bones basics for the sake of my understanding ~ and let's put aside for the moment the consequences of ANY Israeli action or ANY Israeli inaction ~ [1] do you believe Israel has a right to exist? ~ [2] do you believe Israel has a right to defend herself? ~ [3] do you believe Israel has shown restraint in the timing of her reactions? ~ [4] do you believe there is, for whatever reason, a double standard used when "judging" Israel? ~ [5] do you believe the Pals bear any responsibility for their own acts? ~ [6] do you believe other Arab/Muslim countries bear any responsibility to/for the Pals? ~

I admit my knowledge of history thousands of years ago and the intermittent wars is sorely lacking ~ I'm doing some reading on that ~ but, probably not suprisingly, I'm bumping up against what appear to me to be conflicting "facts" ~ if you have sources you think will help me, please post them ~ the two sources I'm plowing my way thru at the moment are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel and http://www.mideastweb.org/briefhistory.htm ~

I see the Pals, via the Hamas "leadership", employing the same terror tactics with the poorly-hidden help of Iran, Syria, and Lebanon ~ the Pal factions can't or won't even live peacefully with each other, let alone with Israel ~ I read somewhere, maybe even in this thread, the comment that the Pals have been used as pawns by everybody ~ that stuck with me ~ but it also emphasizes, at least to me, the validity of Sammy's comments about the Pals needing to rid themselves of fanatic leaders ~

Sooz


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/02/09 8:56 am • # 32 
Thack, Sammy's out of the group. He felt you and he were making it difficult for anyone else to join in. Fluffy had shown an interest. Hopefully, she will post. So, please don't post anymore to him, especially if you're going to misrepresent what he said. Your last post states as his view the opposite of what he stated his view is. Anyone on here can read his posts and yours. He represented his perfectly in his last post. Thanks


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/02/09 2:38 pm • # 33 
I'm sure you think the writing of Washington supports your views. I see it as supporting Sammy's and mine. The hatred the Pals have for Israel causes them to do such things as elect people who will get their children killed and keep them hungry.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/03/09 4:26 am • # 34 
[1] do you believe Israel has a right to exist?

How does one answer a question like that? Israel does exist. I don't think it should ever have been created in the way that it was, but that is a moot point now. Now that it exists, I think it has a right to exist. Will it exist as a jewish state? I don't know. It will be very hard for it to survive, imo.

On the other hand, did the Palestinians have a right to live on their land? Was it right to the Israelis to take their land? Would it have been better for them to live as they had previously when the area of Palestine was the home of christians, jews, muslims, Greeks, arabs and Jews?

[2] do you believe Israel has a right to defend herself?

Yes I do. I think all nations have that right. I would hope that's a rhetorical question.

I recall that Israel was a nation created out of death and terrorism. Menachim Begin and Yitzak Shamir were proponents of terror. Has it ever really stopped?

[3] do you believe Israel has shown restraint in the timing of her reactions?

They may have shone restraint in the timing, but not in the scope. It's been the reaction of many regimes to kill hundreds for each of their own killed. We tend to look down on those kinds of nations. Does Israel get a pass?

[4] do you believe there is, for whatever reason, a double standard used when "judging" Israel?

That depends on who is doing the judging. The US backs Israel no matter what they do. We help to justify their actions. I'm sure that the arabs twist the truth to their own ends. It's obvious that the Palestinians do. So do the Israelis.

[5] do you believe the Pals bear any responsibility for their own acts?

Everyone is responsible for their own acts. I still think it goes back to having an outside force give their land to someone else. They have been angry ever since.

[6] do you believe other Arab/Muslim countries bear any responsibility to/for the Pals?

No. I think the Pals are responsible for themselves. I think many arab/muslim nations pay lip service to them, but send money for weapons, food and medicine. The Jordanians killed thousands of them.

The leaders of the major arab nations know that the US backs Israel and that the US is the de facto power in the world. They would like to see Israel driven into the sea, but they want to sell oil to the US and go about their business. They don't want the power of the US turned against them.

I'd like to ask some questions of my own.

1. Was it right to create the nation of Israel in a land that wasn't dominated by jews, and thereby give the power over the others who did live there to the jews?

2. Was it right for the jews to drive others from their homes and lands? Are the 'settlements' right?

3. Do people who are driven from their lands by the edicts of world organizations have no right to fight for what they believe has been taken from them?

4. Have centuries of persecution, climaxed by the Holocaust, given a harsh edge to the jewish people and their reactions towards those who used to live in the land that was once called Palestine?

5. Isn't persecution simply persecution, regardless of who is doing it?


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/04/09 5:43 am • # 35 
I think Israel has decided to invade and give Hamas greater standing in the general muslim world.

I think Israel's mindset causes them to act against their own self interest.

Will Israel occupy Gaza? Do Israelis want that? What will the outcome be? How does this do anything except to cut the legs out from under the moderate arabs? The Palestinian Authority can't move in to take over governance of Gaza without appearing to be lackey's of the Israelis.

I think Israel has played directly into the hands of their enemy. Again.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/04/09 2:07 pm • # 36 
Sammy, come back to the group. We can work it out. I think we may have both misjudged each other's intent.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/05/09 4:42 pm • # 37 
Ok, Thack, I'm back. What exactly is it we can work out. My intent is to show Israel's side of the issues. Your's is to show the Palestinians'. Opening a new thread to spew hatred of Israel doesn't change anything.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/05/09 5:08 pm • # 38 
For anyone else who may be reading all of this: The shelling did not stop, Hamas is not willing to keep a peace agreement. The Isralis have had to move in to take out the missiles, Hamas who fires them, the areas from which they fire them, and the tunnels from which more are brought in along with other fighters.

I live in Texas. There are many Mexicans (meaning people in Mexico not American citizens) who believe we stole their land. They could make an argument as good as the Pals are making. I guarantee you, if they started lobbing missles into Texas, I would go after them. I would do whatever was necessary to take away their ability to do that.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/06/09 2:08 am • # 39 
Ok, Thack, I'm back. What exactly is it we can work out. My intent is to show Israel's side of the issues. Your's is to show the Palestinians'. Opening a new thread to spew hatred of Israel doesn't change anything.

Maybe we don't have anything to work out.

I don't want to see Israel destroyed, but I also think they work against themselves.

You can feel any way you like.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/06/09 9:33 am • # 40 

And, I think the Pals who have gotten kicked out of most of the Arab countries also work against themselves.



Top
  
PostPosted: 01/06/09 9:35 am • # 41 

If Israel hadn't kicked them out of their own country, they wouldn't have been in Egypt or Jordan.



Top
  
PostPosted: 01/06/09 10:29 am • # 42 
You don't really believe that do you? Image




Top
  
PostPosted: 01/06/09 5:08 pm • # 43 
Sure I do. Why don't you?


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/06/09 6:00 pm • # 44 
Lol We obviously read different reference materials. So, I think your wrong, you think I am. So what's new


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/06/09 7:40 pm • # 45 
It's funny to go back and look over this whole thread.

For instance, in post #16 Thack wrote this to sooz:
"I know the history. I am also a great admirer of Israel and of the jewish people.
Having said that, my view is one of simple realism.
I am aware of the long years of struggle by jews to carve out a piece of Palestine. I understand that Zionism wasn't the only driving force behind it. "

Now in posts to me you're saying Israel was formed just from terrorism. You're saying Israel stole the land from the Pals. You're saying Israel just massacres innocents in reaction to piddly little missiles being lobbed aimlessly. Tell me how you're a great admirer of Israel? You even said this to sooz in post #33: "I recall that Israel was a nation created out of death and terrorism. Menachim Begin and Yitzak Shamir were proponents of terror. Has it ever really stopped?"

In post #18 Thack wrote this

"You may recall Black September in 1970 when thousands of Palestinians were killed in Jordan, by their arab brothers.
That also has nothing to do with the problem that Israel faces today. I'm certainly not 'mad' at Israel for the problems they face. The root of the problem isn't Israel's fault."

Now to me you say the root of the problem is Israel stole the land from the Pals and all the violence is their fault. You acknowledge the slaughter of thousands of Pals by Jordan, yet say that's not relevant, but the Israeli's killing hundreds of innocents in their attempt to shut down Hamas is evil.

I think your true feelings are coming out more and more as the thread continues and you contradict yourself.

Bottom line for me is this. I don't want innocents killed. That means by Hamas and suicide bombers or by Israel. Fact is, Israel has tried and tried to make peace through the UN etc. Israel doesn't break the peace first, Hamas does. I believe Israel has a right to exist and live in peace. I believe the Pals do, too, and should have land in the countries from which they came, including Jordan and Egypt and Gaza and a country of their own. There are many who never left Israel and live peacefully there unless Hezbollah is lobbing missiles into their neighborhoods. They had the right to vote. They could have elected people who would help them get a peaceful solution and their own country. They chose not to. Violence does make violence. Hamas attacks, Israel fights back. Israel has a right to get rid of Hamas when it attacks. Hamas uses schools, mosques, neighborhoods, hospitals etc to hide and fire from. They want the innocents killed. They use them. No country can allow itself to be attacked over and over. The people in the attacking countries have choices. They can get rid of the people who cause the counterattacks or they can support them. They support them or at least have done nothing to stop them. They could support people who would bring in food and medicine through the tunnels instead of weapons and other fighters. Israel has shown she keeps the peace as long as the others do. The Pals need to do the same. Yes they can hold out in hopes that Israel will be destroyed and they can take the land. They know doing that will bring a lot of death and hunger. Or they can have their own country. Why does it have to be reservations? Why can they not build a beautiful country? Arafat led them around everywhere and caused death to them as they were kicked out of each country. They can continue that, or they can choose a life of peace for their children. Look what Israel did with her land. Forget, no never, never forget any of the countries that hurt you. Forgive, no don't forgive either. The Jews did not forget or forgive what was done to them. They did however make the best of what they got. The Pals can do the same. Or they can keep letting their babies die.

So, I think we've argued it out between us, Thack. Others have their views and hopefully will express them.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/07/09 2:42 am • # 46 


Now in posts to me you're saying Israel was formed just from terrorism. You're saying Israel stole the land from the Pals. You're saying Israel just massacres innocents in reaction to piddly little missiles being lobbed aimlessly. Tell me how you're a great admirer of Israel? You even said this to sooz in post #33: "I recall that Israel was a nation created out of death and terrorism. Menachim Begin and Yitzak Shamir were proponents of terror. Has it ever really stopped?"



Yes, I admire the people of Israel and what they have accomplished. For the most part, they aren't to blame for how Israel was created. They are the ones who make Israel successful economically. The government started in blood and runs in blood.

You can't nuance. You think in black and white.

"You may recall Black September in 1970 when thousands of Palestinians were killed in Jordan, by their arab brothers.
That also has nothing to do with the problem that Israel faces today. I'm certainly not 'mad' at Israel for the problems they face. The root of the problem isn't Israel's fault."

Now to me you say the root of the problem is Israel stole the land from the Pals and all the violence is their fault.

The root of the problem started in 1892 and culminated in 1948. The western powers and Britain in particular set the actions of the UN in motion. Various jewish groups perpetrated terrorist acts in order to try and force the issue. Hundreds died or were murdered.

You say you know the history, so I assume you know all this.

You acknowledge the slaughter of thousands of Pals by Jordan, yet say that's not relevant, but the Israeli's killing hundreds of innocents in their attempt to shut down Hamas is evil.

Killing is evil. It doesn't matter who is doing the killing.

We were talking about Israel and the Palestinians. You are the one who keeps bringing up Egypt, Jorda and Syria. None of them have anything to do with the problems between Israel and the Palestinians.

Your arguments are everywhere but on the subject of Israel's treatment of the people whose land they occupy.

I think your true feelings are coming out more and more as the thread continues and you contradict yourself.

You don't seem to comprehend what I post. You want to come across as a smart guy, even thought you seem to have no point except to pretend that Israel has done nothing wrong. I see wrong on both sides. You only see Palestinians as being wrong.

I think that's wrong.

The rest of your post is simply bullshit.

Israel has pushed illegal settlements into Palestinian areas for it's entire existence. The violations of Palestinian rights has occurred throught Israeli history. There is blood on everyone's hands.

You ignore the innocents killed continually in bombings, artillery strikes, etc and justify those innocents who are killed by saying that they support Hamas, are Palestinians and thereby bring death upon themselves.

I think that's a despicable way to think.

Dazzle me with another response.







Last edited by Thack on 01/07/09 2:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
PostPosted: 01/07/09 8:22 am • # 47 
I've given my responses. You've given yours. Anyone interested can decide for themselves which are "bullshit". They can choose from yours whether to read the first part of the thread or the last part, since they contradict each other.

I don't care whether I come across as a smart guy or not. It doesn't take smarts to know as much on the subject as you do. I'm not a smart guy. Never have been and never will be. I accepted that long ago. Has nothing to do with the issue does it?


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

Go to page Previous  1, 2   Page 2 of 2   [ 47 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.