It is currently 05/11/24 3:27 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 1 post ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/23/09 7:29 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
And the second argument is that the Constitution requires Congress to "... provide for the ... general Welfare of the United States" and that "...all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States" [quotes from the Preamble to the US Constitution] ~�Boehner continues living up to his name ~ he admits he is not a Constitutional lawyer, but yet refuses to accept the interpretation of those who ARE Constitutional lawyers and scholars, including Scalia ~ Sooz


By Ian Millhiser at 1:40 pm

Pelosi Dismisses Tenther Reporter: 'Are You Serious?'

Recently, a reporter with right-wing press outlet CNSNews asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi whether health reform violates the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution.� The Speaker gave the question exactly as much respect as it deserved:

Quote:

CNSNews.com: "Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?"

Pelosi: "Are you serious? Are you serious?"

Listen here:

Pelosi is right to be dismissive of the fringe right-wing theory behind this question, which has no basis in the Constitution itself.� Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the power "[t]o regulate commerce…among the several states" as well as the authority to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution" its power to regulate commerce. Even ultra-conservative Justice Antonin Scalia acknowledges that these constitutional provisions give Congress sweeping authority to enact laws that regulate "economic activity."

CNSNews' question to the House Speaker essentially parrots a claim by two discredited right-wing attorneys that a provision of health reform known as the "individual mandate" exceeds Congress' authority because it does not regulate economic activity.� This claim is wrong.

When confronted with the "tenther" question, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) offered an entirely novel argument against the individual mandate.� Although Boehner admitted that he is "not a constitutional lawyer," he added that "it's wrong to mandate that the American people have to do anything":

Quote:

Boehner said: "Well, I'm not a lawyer and I'm certainly not a constitutional lawyer, but I think it's wrong to mandate that the American people have to do anything.

"You know, one of the things that's great about America is that we have the freedom to do anything that we want, as long as it doesn't infringe on somebody else's freedom," said Boehner.

For the record, nothing in the Constitution says that an Act of Congress is unconstitutional simply because John Boehner thinks that it is "wrong."



Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 1 post ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.