It is currently 05/11/24 1:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 5 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/26/09 7:13 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Paul Broun is beyond extreme even by extreme standards ~ he buys into the birthers', tenthers', nativists' mindsets ~ he has pushed hard that a public option "will kill people" ~ and he still spouts "constitutionality" questions where the questions have been raised and answered, but he doesn't like the answers ~ anyone who supports privatization of Medicare is not paying attention to the enormous problems and huge expenses encountered in the Medicare Advantage experiment ~ Sooz


By Zaid Jilani at 1:30 pm

Rep. Paul Broun Proposes Bill That Would Privatize Medicare

One of the great success stories of the modern American welfare state has been the Medicare system, which - since 1966 - has provided health insurance for all Americans age 65 and done so much more efficiently than private insurance. While Medicare may be a very popular program today, it was bitterly fought by the right when it was proposed. (Ronald Reagan even produced commercials claiming that the single-payer health care system for the elderly would lead to a dictatorship.)

In an attempt to reclaim the right's rich tradition of opposing Medicare, Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) has proposed legislation that would roll back the Medicare system and replace it with a system of vouchers that seniors could use to purchase private insurance:

Quote:

U.S. Rep. Paul Broun introduced his own health care reform bill last week that would, among other things, privatize the Medicare insurance program for seniors.

Broun's bill would replace government benefits with vouchers that could be spent on private insurance or put in tax-free medical savings accounts.

"We've got to fix Medicare," he said. "It's headed in a direction that's unsustainable."

While Medicare is facing future budgetary problems, privatization isn't the solution. Medicare Advantage, the Medicare plan under which the administration of the program is farmed out to private insurance companies, has more than five times the administrative costs of the traditional public Medicare plan.

Earlier this year, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) - who is a strong supporter of extending a program like Medicare to all Americans - introduced an amendment that would eliminate Medicare. Not a single member of Congress voted for Weiner's amendment, including Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA), despite his long-held belief that the program is unconstitutional.

http://thinkprogress.org



Top
  
PostPosted: 10/26/09 10:24 am • # 2 
How old is this guy? Just wondering...


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/26/09 10:51 am • # 3 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Broun is 63, pic ~ here is his Wiki bio ~ an MD no less ~ and sits on the Committee on Science and Technology but claims global warming is a "hoax" ~ Image ~ I know we have several posts about Paul Broun, which you can find by searching his name on our General board ~ Sooz


Paul Collins Broun, Jr. (born May 14, 1946[1][/sup]) is a Republican United States Representative from Georgia's 10th congressional district. He is a member of the House Homeland Security Committee and the House Science & Technology Committee.

[edit] Personal life

Broun was born in Atlanta, Georgia, the son of Democratic Georgia state senator Paul Broun, Sr. (1916-2005), who represented Athens and the surrounding area from 1963 to 2001. The younger Broun is a graduate of the University of Georgia at Athens and earned his Doctor of Medicine from the Medical College of Georgia in Augusta. Broun and his wife, the former Niki Bronson, have two adult daughters and a teenage son.

[edit] Political career

Broun grew up as a Democrat, but became a Republican sometime in the 1980s. He was previously a candidate for the U.S. House in 1990, losing to Democratic incumbent Richard Ray, and for the U.S. Senate in 1996, losing the Republican primary.[2][/sup]

Broun was one of the top two vote-getters in a June 2007 special congressional election to fill the seat vacated by the late Charlie Norwood. The first place finisher, State Senator Jim Whitehead, more than doubled Broun's vote total, and Broun had only 198 votes more than the third-place finisher.

In the runoff campaign, Whitehead angered some voters by failing to appear at a debate held in Athens and then by referring to his alma mater, the University of Georgia, as a "liberal bastion" that should be eliminated, save for the football team.[3][/sup] In the runoff election held on July 17, 2007, Broun upset Whitehead by 0.8 percent, fewer than 400 votes. After the votes were certified, Whitehead declined to ask for a recount despite the narrow margin.[3][/sup] On July 25, 2007, Broun was sworn in by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.[4][/sup]

[edit] Legislation

Broun introduced a military anti-pornography bill into the House of Representatives. The bill is meant to stem the sales of pornography on U.S military installations. This bill basically notes that the there should be no loopholes in a former piece of legislation (Title 10 of the United States code), effectively banning military personnel from viewing pornography (Now entitled the "Military Honor and Decency Act").[5][/sup] According to Broun's website, legislation will only be passed based on his "Four Way Test", which includes, "1) Is it moral/right?, 2) Is it constitutional?, 3) Is it necessary?, and 4) Is it affordable?".[1][/sup]

On September 29, 2008, Broun voted against H.R. 3997, the economic relief or "bailout" plan addressing the recent economic crisis.[6][/sup]

In May 2009, Broun proposed legislation that 2010 be proclaimed "The Year Of The Bible".[7][/sup]

In June 2009, Broun voted against a climate change bill, calling the entire concept of global warming a "hoax" perpetuated by the scientific community.[8][/sup]

[edit] Committee Assignments

[edit] Remarks Comparing Barack Obama and Adolf Hitler

On November 10, 2008, one week after the 2008 presidential election, Broun drew national attention[9][/sup] when he criticized then President-elect Barack Obama's call for a civilian national security force, suggesting that Obama might use it to establish a Marxist dictatorship.[10][/sup]

In an interview with the Associated Press, Broun said, "That's exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it's exactly what the Soviet Union did. When he's proposing to have a national security force that's answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he's showing me signs of being Marxist." Broun later clarified his statement by saying, "We can't be lulled into complacency. You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I'm not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I'm saying is there is the potential of going down that road."[10][/sup]

Broun cited a July 2008 speech by Obama in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate had said, "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." A spokesman for Obama indicated that he had been referring to a civilian reserve corps intended to handle postwar reconstruction efforts, such as rebuilding infrastructure. The Bush administration has endorsed this idea,[10][/sup] and a Civilian Response Corps, described as similar to the one proposed by Obama,[11][/sup] was formed in 2006 by the Bush Administration after a bipartisan Congressional vote.

[edit] Further Statements

The following day, November 11, Broun seemingly backed away from his statements, saying on WGAC radio, "I regret putting it that way," and "I apologize to anyone who has taken offense at that."[9][/sup][12][/sup] Broun nevertheless asserted that Obama "is extremely liberal" and "has promoted a lot of socialistic ideas, and it just makes me concerned."

His remarks in the radio interview were at first interpreted in the press as an apology.[13][/sup] However, Broun's office later said he was "not taking back anything he said" and a spokeswoman said, "We have not issued any official apology" for the remarks.[11][/sup][14][/sup] The spokeswoman said Broun stood by a written statement he had issued in which he criticized Obama for having "socialist views" and raised what the Atlanta Journal Constitution described as "ominous concerns" about the civilian force.[11][/sup] The news release read in part, "I firmly believe that we must not fall victim to the 'it can't happen here' mentality. I adhere to the adage 'eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.'" Broun also said that his comments had been sensationalized by the media.[15][/sup]

[edit] Reactions

Broun's fellow lawmakers criticized his remarks. Republican U.S. Senators Johnny Isakson and Saxby Chambliss both expressed disagreement with his comments, while state Democratic Party spokesman Martin Matheny accused Broun of "playing to the extremes" at a time "when Americans are coming together to celebrate history and renew America's promise." and that "Broun's neo-McCarthyism has no place in today's political environment."[9][/sup]

[edit] Accusations against CAIR

On October 14, 2009, Broun joined with three fellow Representatives in calling for the investigation of CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) over allegations of trying to plant "spies," based on a CAIR memo indicating that they "will develop national initiatives such as Lobby Day, and placing Muslim interns in Congressional offices." Broun further implied CAIR had involvement with terrorism, stating, "If an organization that is connected to or supports terrorists is running influence operations or planting spies in key national security-related congressional offices, I think this needs to be made known." [16][/sup]

CAIR has countered that accusations against them are "unfounded" and that such initiatives are extensively used by all advocacy groups. A CAIR representative has accused Broun and his colleagues of being "hate-filled" and of seeking to intimidate American Muslims who "take part in the political process and exercise their rights." [17][/sup]


[edit] References

Top
  
PostPosted: 10/26/09 1:00 pm • # 4 
OK, 63. So I guess that means he won't enroll in medicare when he turns 65 (assuming it is still a government program at that time)?


Top
  
PostPosted: 10/26/09 4:27 pm • # 5 
That dude better leave my medicare alone!


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 5 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.