It is currently 04/28/24 4:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 11/12/09 8:42 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
In case any of us needed proof that the really really really rich ARE different ~ $43,800,000 is not a bad return on a $385,000 investment [and Warhol netted even less] ~ Image ~ Warhol's gift to his receptionist, which ultimately made her a wealthy woman, reminds me of Ray Kroc who originally paid his secretary [then June Martino] in McDonald's stock because cash was so tight ~ Ms Martino ended up on the "US wealthiest" list for several years ~ Sooz


Warhol painting a hot ticket at NYC auction

Associated Press


NEW YORK - A painting by pop artist Andy Warhol, "200 One Dollar Bills," brought $43.8 million at auction, more than three times its highest presale estimate of $12 million.

The piece, one of Warhol's first silk-screen paintings, sold at Sotheby's on Wednesday evening. The auction house did not reveal the names of the buyer and seller.

Bidding for the seminal work was spirited and fast. Auctioneer Tobias Meyer opened bidding at $6 million, which was immediately doubled. Five more people in the room jumped in, competing until a phone bidder was declared the winner.

The current record for a Warhol is $71.7 million for "Green Car Crash", sold at Christie's in 2007.

Executed in 1962, the painting was once owned by taxi tycoon Robert C. Scull, who purchased it directly from Warhol's dealer. The current owner bought it in 1986 for $385,000.

It was the highest price fetched at the Contemporary Art sale, which totaled $134.4 million, well above the high presale total of $97.7 million.

Other Warhol paintings also drew strong prices.

His 1965 "Self-Portrait," which the artist gave to Cathy Naso, a receptionist who worked at his Factory, sold for $6.1 million. It had been estimated to sell for $1 million to $1.5 million.

Naso, who attended the auction, was 19 years old when Warhol gave her the painting inscribed to her. She displayed it briefly and then stored it in a closet, where it remained until this year.

"I think I am dreaming," Naso said. "Andy has made me famous for 15 minutes and I've come to realize that 15 minutes of fame is more than enough."

An untitled 1962 Warhol drawing of a roll of dollar bills belonging to New York collector Leonard Newman sold for $4.2 million, above its $2.5 million to $3.5 million presale estimate.

The strong bidding, coming after last year's sagging auction prices amid a global financial downturn, were attributed to the works' stellar provenance, condition and collectors' desire for high quality work by well-known artists.

"With an offering of true icons of postwar art, we saw bidding from all corners of the world, from both dyed-in-wool collectors and new clients alike," said Anthony Grant, Sotheby's international senior specialist of contemporary art.

"200 One Dollar Bills is a hugely important work for American art history," added Alex Rotter, head of Sotheby's contemporary art in New York. "Not only was it one of the starting points of pop art, but this picture had the perfect ownership history."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_warhol_painting;



Top
  
PostPosted: 11/12/09 10:57 am • # 2 
Just goes to prove its not what you know but who know and be in the right place at the right time.
Just imagine the patience of painting 200 one dollar bills must have become automatic after the first twenty or so.
Not my sort of art though


Top
  
PostPosted: 11/12/09 11:24 am • # 3 
Truth be told, they are now shelling out more for the iconic signature than they are for the painting.
"200 Dollar Bills" is a silk-screen so it's actually more a print than a "painting".


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 11/12/09 3:35 pm • # 4 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/23/09
Posts: 3185
Location: ontario canada
I'm up and down about Andy Warhol. I think in his time he had a unique message, about pop culture, it's mass production, it's emptiness on the one hand and it's collective consciousness on the other. But the hype about him got way out of hand imo. That whole business about art not imitating life anymore, but life imitating Andy Warhol was pointless, aggrandizing, and diminished both his message and his importance as an artist. Instead of his art being a comment on mass produced pop culture, it became part of it.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.