It is currently 04/04/25 10:39 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ]
Author Message
PostPosted: 11/19/09 2:44 am • # 1 

All Afghan detainees likely tortured: diplomat

Last Updated: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 | 10:17 PM ET
CBC News

Image
Richard Colvin, a former senior
diplomat with Canada's mission
in Afghanistan, appears before a
House of Commons committee
Wednesday in Ottawa. (CBC)

All detainees transferred by Canadians to Afghan prisons were likely tortured by Afghan officials and many of the prisoners were innocent, says a former senior diplomat with Canada's mission in Afghanistan.

Appearing before a House of Commons committee Wednesday, Richard Colvin blasted the detainees policies of Canada and compared them with the policies of the British and the Netherlands.

The detainees were captured by Canadian soldiers then handed over to the Afghan intelligence service, called the NDS.

Colvin said Canada was taking six times as many detainees as British troops and 20 times as many as the Dutch.

He said unlike the British and Dutch, Canada did not monitor their conditions; took days, weeks or months to notify the Red Cross; kept poor records; and to prevent scrutiny, the Canadian Forces leadership concealed this behind "walls of secrecy."

"As I learned more about our detainee practices, I came to a conclusion they were contrary to Canada's values, contrary to Canada's interests, contrary to Canada's official policies and also contrary to international law. That is, they were un-Canadian, counterproductive and probably illegal.

"According to our information, the likelihood is that all the Afghans we handed over were tortured. For interrogators in Kandahar, it was a standard operating procedure," Colvin said.

He said the most common forms of torture were beatings, whipping with power cables, the use of electricity, knives, open flames and rape.

Colvin worked in Kandahar for the Department of Foreign Affairs in 2006. He later moved to Kabul, where he was second-in-command at the Canadian Embassy. In both jobs, Colvin visited detainees transferred by Canadian soldiers to Afghan prisons. He wrote reports about those visits and sent them to Ottawa.

Colvin told the committee that the detainees were not "high-value targets" such as IED bomb makers, al-Qaeda terrorists or Taliban commanders.

"According to a very authoritative source, many of the Afghans we detained had no connection to insurgency whatsoever," he said. "From an intelligence point of view, they had little or no value."

Colvin said some may have been foot soldiers or day fighters but many were just local people at the wrong place at the wrong time.

"In other words, we detained and handed over for severe torture a lot of innocent people."

Colvin said they began informing the Canadian Forces and Foreign Affairs officials about the detainee situation in 2006 with verbal and written reports.

He said the warnings were at first mostly ignored, but by April 2007, they were receiving written messages from government officials that in the future not to put things on paper, but instead use the telephone.

Colvin mentioned David Mulroney, a deputy minister who is now the ambassador to China, as one of the officials who didn't want to hear the allegations.

Colvin said when a new ambassador arrived in May, the paper trail on detainees was reduced and reports on detainees were at times "censored" with crucial information removed.

He said all of these steps were "extremely irregular."

At the time, the government denied there were any credible allegations of torture.

But Tories questioned the validity of Colvin's sources, saying the information he received concerning the allegations were from second-hand and third-hand reports.

Colvin's testimony "seemed dramatic, but under questioning it was revealed to be filmsy, inconsistent, unreliable," Laurie Hawn, parliamentary secretary to Defence Minister Peter MacKay told CBC News. "[He] did not come across as credible."

While he didn't doubt Colvin's sincerity, "every time something has happened in that mission, we have taken action," Hawn said. "And that's evidenced by the improvements in the prison, the training we've done, money we've invested, the visits we've had organized with the various authorities there."

Colvin also said he only spoke to four detainees himself and he had no way to guarantee those prisoners had in fact been captured by Canadian troops.

He also admitted he never raised the allegations with ministers who travelled through Kandahar.



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 11/19/09 3:47 am • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
no surprises here. at least for me.


Top
  
PostPosted: 11/19/09 7:25 am • # 3 
Here are the reasons why this is going to be huge:

The Harper Conservatives rode into power on a wave of branding Liberals as corrupt. They would always make sure that any time they were referring to "Liberals", the word "corrupt" would be in the same sentence. It worked and they became Canada's governing party - a minority government, but power none the less. That was in 2006 where this story picks up. During that time, absolutely no party operative in the Conservative party, nor any Conservative Member of Parliament was allowed to speak to the press without clearing what they would say with the Prime Minister's Office. When the orignal news story broke, the Conservative choir said that they were aware of the problem, pressured the Aghan Government to abide by the Geneva Convention and all was corrected - end of story. Here we are three years later and we find out that in fact, nothing was done about the issue and worse yet, most if not all of the detainees were civilians arrested by field command troops (as opposed to high-value targets arrested by special operations). Further we find that this only served to turn the civilian population against the troops this government has made great pains to claim they are honouring.

The real questions here are: how far up the chain does the knowledge of this ghastly activity go? Does it stop at the Prime Minister's Office? Did the Prime Minister or his office engage in a cover-up? If not, does this mean that the military was actively engaged in lying to parliament and then engaged in a cover-up?

Make no mistake - the allegations that Richard Colvin is making have far-reaching implications. Theoretically, any country that has signed on to the World Court could file charges of war crimes against the Canadian government! Not only that... this Conservative government has gone out of it's way to hammer China on human rights - something the previous Liberal government was reluctant to do. This policy has strained relations between Canada and China to the detriment of resources companies across the country. Lo and behold - today in the Bejing press - I am told that the headlines are something like "CANADA COMMITS WAR CRIMES" etc.

From the moment Stephen Harper entered the national stage, I never trusted nor liked him so one could say I am only being biased - but this is appalling. Essentially, the Harper government has - knowingly or otherwise - damaged the reputation of our already hard-pressed military - damaged the perception of Canada around the world - lied to Parliament and the Canadian people and may well be the first Canadian government to answer to the World Court on war crimes allegations.

Disgust doesn't even describe how I feel right now.

..


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 11/19/09 7:32 am • # 4 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
welcome to my nightmare, Sid.


Top
  
PostPosted: 11/19/09 7:38 am • # 5 
Welcome to mine...


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 11/19/09 10:21 am • # 6 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/23/09
Posts: 3185
Location: ontario canada
Sid, thanks for posting this. Canadians need to know, and feel accountable for how our representatives behave abroad, and for how they are being INSTRUCTED to behave. And if Harper's government is involved, then people need to know that as well, before the next election.

I want to write to someone, but i'm not sure who. My local mp could be a start.


Top
  
PostPosted: 11/19/09 10:30 am • # 7 
My local MP is Dianne Finlay. Her husband is Harper's best buddy.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 11/19/09 10:32 am • # 8 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/22/09
Posts: 9530
I thought this was an issue a couple of years ago and procedures put in place to correct it.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 11/19/09 11:04 am • # 9 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
jimwilliam wrote:
I thought this was an issue a couple of years ago and procedures put in place to correct it.


and i thought that Canada was better than the US. Image


Top
  
PostPosted: 11/19/09 11:58 am • # 10 
jimwilliam wrote:
I thought this was an issue a couple of years ago and procedures put in place to correct it.
That's the central point to Richard Colvin's allegations. He's saying that despite the government's reassurances that they were doing something about it, the torture continued. He's also alledging that there was a blatant cover-up perpetrated by senior military officials any time he enquired about the continuing torture.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.