It is currently 04/28/24 5:27 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/18/09 4:05 pm • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Every time I [or others] have posted about the R "obstruct/defeat" vow, gop has defended the Rs by stating [rightfully so, btw] that they are only using tactics designed to ensure the minority party has a voice ~ Coburn [a "new conservative" and a "C Street" honcho] however is so much of an egotistical fool that he proves me [and others] correct ~ here's a news flash: I am part of�"the American people" he pretends to be listening to, and he does NOT speak for me ~ nor the other 60%+ "American people" who are in favor of real health care reform ~ "good faith negotiating" my ass ~Image~ Sooz


By Zaid Jilani at 8:45 pm

Coburn Admits Republicans Are Just Trying To Kill The Bill: 'The American People Want To Hear Us Say No'

As the health care debate enters its final stages, Republicans are doing everything they can to slow the process down in order to "defeat" the Senate bill. In recent days, GOP senators have claimed they are working "in good faith" and simply want to take the time to "see a little bit of what's in the bill."

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), who most recently killed an attempt by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) to have a debate about his single-payer health care amendment by forcing the 767-page document to be read aloud on the floor, today let truth slip out. On Washington Journal, Coburn explained that he sees the GOP's role is to defeat the health care bill, saying "The American people want to hear us say no." He added, "No is a wonderful word":

Quote:

COBURN: Look, there's nothing wrong with the word no. No is a word Washington needs to hear. The American people want to hear us say no. No when we're stealing 43 cents out of every dollar that we spend this year from our grandkids. No when we're ignoring the Constitution. No when we're gonna pass a bill that says you have to buy something even when it goes totally against the Constitution and the enumerated powers of our Constitution. No to socialism at every turn. … There's nothing wrong with that word, it's a healthy word. … No is a wonderful word.

Watch it:

Later this afternoon, Coburn admitted to reporters during a conference call hosted by the Republican National Committee that the goal of his party is to "kill the bill."

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/12/18/cob ... uctionism/



Last edited by sooz06 on 12/18/09 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
PostPosted: 12/18/09 4:14 pm • # 2 
How many times did he say the word "no" between 2004 and 2009?


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/18/09 8:06 pm • # 3 
People like him should be made to wear a stamp on his forhead saying "I'm a moron."


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/19/09 2:45 am • # 4 
I wonder if he's going to love the word "no" come election time.


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/19/09 3:13 am • # 5 
Democrats only think "no" is a bad word when they hold the reins of power.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/19/09 6:24 am • # 6 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
gopqed wrote:
Democrats only think "no" is a bad word when they hold the reins of power.

wrong! democrats think no is a bad word when it runs counter to their principles, JUST LIKE REPUBLICANS.

where has your honesty gone this week, gop?


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/20/09 4:17 am • # 7 
I've never thought of "no" as a bad word when you're talking about developing legislation. It simply means that there are people who have a different view of an issue, and if there are enough of them, the "yes" side needs to work with some on the "no" side to achieve a compromise if they want to get something done.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/20/09 4:26 am • # 8 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 04/05/09
Posts: 8047
Location: Tampa, Florida
For some reason I have the suspicion that even if the Democrats would tear up the current compromise and replace it with a tort reform only bill, the Repubs would reply with a firm "NO".


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/20/09 6:24 am • # 9 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
gopqed wrote:
I've never thought of "no" as a bad word when you're talking about developing legislation. It simply means that there are people who have a different view of an issue, and if there are enough of them, the "yes" side needs to work with some on the "no" side to achieve a compromise if they want to get something done.

no is not a bad word in many situations. any child over the age of two knows that.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/20/09 6:24 am • # 10 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
jabra2 wrote:
For some reason I have the suspicion that even if the Democrats would tear up the current compromise and replace it with a tort reform only bill, the Repubs would reply with a firm "NO".

and that is their prerogative. they are not really representing the American public, after all. they have their corporate masters to serve. never has that been more clear than in this healthcare debate.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.