It is currently 06/18/24 2:25 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 15 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/19/10 6:17 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
I've long been a fan of Moyers, and I was introduced to Frank by his book "What's the Matter With Kansas?" [which I think should be required reading] ~ this transcript is not so much a defense of Obama as it is the recognition of "we the people" allowing the Rs to escape responsibility for any of today's problems ~ this is truly a terrific read, with LOTS of truth ~ Sooz


Bill Moyers & Thomas Frank: How America's Demented Politics Let the GOP Off the Hook for Their Giant Mess

By Bill Moyers and Thomas Frank, Bill Moyers Journal. Posted January 19, 2010.

Bill Moyers interviews Thomas Frank on how our short attention span has allowed conservatives to escape blame for their role in the economic meltdown.

Editor's note: In the following interview Bill Moyers and Thomas Frank, author of "What's the Matter With Kansas" and "The Wrecking Crew," talk about why conservatives can get away with blaming Obama for the past decade of conservative failures.

Bill Moyers: There were hands in the air in Washington this week, but it wasn't a stickup. The new Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, appointed by Congress to find out how America got rolled, began hearings this week. These four are not the victims of one of the greatest bank heists in history - they're the perpetrators, bankers so sleek and crafty they got off with the loot in broad daylight, and then sweet talked the government into taxing us to pay it back.

Watching that scene on the opening day of the hearings, it was hard enough to believe that almost a year has passed since Barack Obama raised his hand, too -- taking the oath of office to become our 44th President. Even harder to remember what America looked like before Obama, because we've also been robbed of memory, assaulted by what the Nobel laureate Czeslaw Milosz described as a "fantastic proliferation of mass media." We live in a time "characterized by a refusal to remember." Inconvenient facts simply disappear down the memory hole, as in George Orwell's novel, "1984."

President Obama's made plenty of mistakes during his first year, and we've critiqued them frequently here on the JOURNAL, but hardly anyone talks any more about what happened in the years before. He inherited from George W. Bush the biggest financial debacle since the Great Depression, along with two unpopular and costly wars, and a dysfunctional and demoralized government.

It's important to remember those years, a time that has been characterized by the historian Thomas Frank, as "A Low, Dishonest Decade." He's here to talk about them with me. Thomas Frank is editor of the recently relaunched BAFFLER magazine, a literary journal; a contributing editor of HARPER'S; a weekly columnist for THE WALL STREET JOURNAL; and the author of ONE MARKET UNDER GOD, the bestselling WHAT'S THE MATTER WITH KANSAS? and his latest bestseller, THE WRECKING CREW, now out in paperback. Good to have you back.

THOMAS FRANK: It's my pleasure, Bill.

BILL MOYERS: How is it that the people who are responsible for the mess that Obama inherited are getting away with demonizing him when he's only had less than a year to clean it up. Let me show you just a sample of commentators railing against the President.

RUSH LIMBAUGH: President Obama and the Democrats are destroying the US economy. They are purposefully doing it, I believe.

GLENN BECK: This is a well-thought out plan to collapse the economy as we know it.

JONATHAN HOENIG: The president has, I think if you listen to what he says, a hatred for capitalism. Where do jobs come from? They don't come from the government, they come from the profit seeking self-interest, from what I hear and see, the President never misses an opportunity to smear and [no audio] slap!

RUSH LIMBAUGH: This guy is a coward. He does not have the gonads or the spine to even stand up and accept what he's doing! All of this is his doing. He cannot even probably say, you should like this -- you may not like this, but I'm telling you it's the best thing for you, it's the best thing for me. No! He knows it's a disaster, he has to slough this off, on his previous-- or his predecessor, the previous administration.

SEAN HANNITY: It's his stimulus. It's his record deficit spending. He quadrupled the debt in a year. You know, how many more are the Democrats going to say, "Well, it's George Bush's fault"? This is Obama's economy now.

BILL MOYERS: What goes through your mind as a historian when you watch that?

THOMAS FRANK: Well, that is America for you. I mean, that is the, sort of the demented logic of our politics. Is that now-- Obama's been President for a year. And he will come before the public in the fall, you know, having to defend all of these terrible things. That's how our politics works in this country.

BILL MOYERS: But you called it demented. I mean, you know, demented means crazy, mad. Mad and crazy enough to cause us to forget the world before Obama?

THOMAS FRANK: I'll give you an example what I mean. So, I was on a radio show the other day with a tea party leader, you know, one of these protest leaders. And he seemed like a good guy. But what he did say that struck me was he said he was really against monopoly, you know? And we're laboring under all these monopolies, all these concentrated powers here in America. And what we need to do is get back to free markets. And then we can do away with that. And it was mind-blowing.

Because if you look back any further than the Obama Administration, since, I mean, 1980 in this country, we have been in the grip of, you know, of this pursuit of ever-purer free markets. That's what American politics has been about. That's what has delivered this, you know, the awful circumstances that we find ourselves in today. And to think that that's what's missing, that's what we need to get back to, is--

BILL MOYERS: That's more than nostalgia. What is that?

THOMAS FRANK: Well, that's the disease of our time. You know, that sort of instant forgetting.

BILL MOYERS: But what does it do to our politics when the very spokesmen for what some people have called a decade of conservative failure. I mean, remember before Obama, they turned a budget surplus into a deficit. They took us to war on fraudulent pretenses. They borrowed money to fight it. They presided over a stalemate in Afghanistan. They trashed the Constitution. They presided over the weakest economy in decades--

THOMAS FRANK: Not weak for everybody.

BILL MOYERS: No, no.

THOMAS FRANK: Some people did really well.

BILL MOYERS: Okay, they compiled the worst track record on jobs in decades. And they ended up with the worst stock market in decades. I mean, it was a decade of conservative failure. And yet, Obama's their villain?

THOMAS FRANK: Think of all the crises and the disasters that you've described. And I would add to them things like the, what happened in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. And the Madoff scandal on Wall Street. And, you know, on and on and on. The Jack Abramoff scandal. The whole sordid career of Tom DeLay.

All of these things that we remember from the last decade. I mean, some of them that we're forgetting. Like who remembers all the scandals over earmarking, anymore? And who remembers all the scandals over Iraq reconstruction? All that, you know, disastrous, when we would hand it off to a private contractor to rebuild Iraq. And it would, you know, of course, it would fail.

Those things have all sort of been dwarfed by the economic disaster and the wreckage on Wall Street. But I would say to you that all of these things that we're describing here are of a piece. And that they all flow from the same ideas. And those ideas are the sort of conservative attitude towards government. And conservative attitudes towards governance. Okay?

BILL MOYERS: That government is a perversion.

THOMAS FRANK: Government is-- yeah, government is a perversion. And to believe that the federal government can be operated, you know, with all of its programs, can be operated well and do things that are good for the people, is, as you say, is a perversion.

And they look at someone like Barack Obama and it makes them seethe. Because that's, you know, that's what he's trying to do. What conservatism in this country is about is government failure. Conservatives talk about government failure all the time, constantly. And conservatives, when they're in power deliver government failure.

BILL MOYERS: Not merely from incompetence, you say, but from ideology, from philosophy, from a view of the world.

THOMAS FRANK: And sometimes from design.

BILL MOYERS: From design? What do you mean?

THOMAS FRANK: Not always from design, but often. The Department of Labor, for example, the conservatives when they in office, routinely stuff the Department of Labor full of ideological cranks. And people that don't believe in the mission.

And the result is that it doesn't-- they don't enforce anything. Towards the very end of the Bush-era, the Department of Labor had been whittled down. It was a shell of its former self. And at the very end of the Bush Administration, one of the government accountability programs did a study of the Department of Labor. And, I'm smiling, because it's kind of amusing. It was like an old spy magazine prank.

They made up these horrendous labor violations around the country and phoned them in as complaints to the Department of Labor to see what they would do, okay? They responded to one out of ten of these, you know, where they called in as like, "Well, we got, you know, kids working in a meat packing plant during school hours. You know, can you, you going to do anything about that?" "No." Or you look at something like the Securities and Exchange Commission. These guys are supposed to be regulating, you know, the investment banks, okay? Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, that sort of thing. These guys were so under-funded, and not just under-funded, but you had people in charge of it who didn't believe in regulating Wall Street.

BILL MOYERS: So, they made the Securities and Exchange Commission a laughing stock, if you will. They really did.

THOMAS FRANK: Right. Well, there's these horrible stories that came out. Once Bush was out, there was a study done of the SEC, as well. These people didn't even have like their own functioning photocopiers, okay? So, we're talking about the lawyers that are supposed to be protecting us from Wall Street. And they have to go stand in line at Kinko's to do their own photocopying. And they're going up against the best paid, you know, best educated lawyers on planet Earth, who represent the investment banks. And they're supposed to be defending us.

BILL MOYERS: The curious thing about this is that you and I and my audience knows that our ancestors believed that capitalism needed to be supervised. But when the conservatives came to power, they begin to muzzle the watchdog.

THOMAS FRANK: Yeah. Well, or you know, do away with it altogether, de-fund it. Look, the beginning in the 1980s, President Reagan came to office and came to power, and you remember the kind of rhetoric that he used to use in denouncing the Federal workforce. He hated the Federal workforce. And this is an article of faith among conservatives.

There's something called the pay gap that they used to talk about a lot in Washington, D.C. Which is, back in the '50s, '60s, and up into the 1970s, Federal workers were paid a comparable amount to what people in the private sector earned. Okay? So, if you're a lawyer working for the government, you got about as much as a lawyer working in the private sector.

Not as much, because government benefits are considered to be much better. Okay. Under Reagan, you had this huge gap open up between Federal workers and the private sector. I asked around. And I found out a government attorney makes $140,000 a year on retirement. After he's been there all his life. In the private sector law firm in Washington, you'd be making $160,000 starting salary. That's first year. Right out of law school.

BILL MOYERS: So what's the consequence of this pay gap you described? Or, do we get inferior government because of it?

THOMAS FRANK: Absolutely. It keeps the best and the brightest out of government service, unless you're really dedicated to a cause.

But let me go one step further with this, Bill. When I say this is done by design, I'm not exaggerating. And this is one of the more surprising things that I found when I was doing the research for "The Wrecking Crew," is that there's a whole conservative literature on why you want second-rate people in government, or third-rate.

I found an interview with the head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce from 1928, where he said-- this quote, it's mind-boggling to me. But he really said this. "The best public servant is the worst one." Okay? You want bad people in government. You want to deliberately staff government with second-rate people. Because if you have good people in government, government will work. And then the public will learn to trust government. And then they'll hand over more power to it.

And you don't want that, of course. Your Chamber of Commerce. And I thought, when I first read this, "That's a crazy idea. I can't believe that sentiment." And then I found it repeated again and again and again. Throughout the long history of the conservative movement. This is something they believe very deeply.

BILL MOYERS: It comes out of a definitive way of seeing things, right?

THOMAS FRANK: Yes. And we can summarize that very briefly. That the market is the, you know, is the universal principle of human civilization. And that government is a kind of interloper, if not a, you know, criminal gang. And getting in the way.

BILL MOYERS: But we saw with this collapse and this bailout, we saw the failure of that.

THOMAS FRANK: Of course.

BILL MOYERS: And yet there's no sense of contrition. What's amazing to me, and you wrote this, that the very people who brought us this decade of conservative failures, the party of Palin, Beck, Hannity, Abramoff, Rove, DeLay, Kristol, O'Reilly, just might stage a comeback.

THOMAS FRANK: I think they might. I think there's a very strong chance of that.

BILL MOYERS: After only 11 months out of power, because of the record. I mean--

THOMAS FRANK: Look, well, the stuff--

BILL MOYERS: --it's crazy.

THOMAS FRANK: --the stuff we've been talking about here today. The stuff in "The Wrecking Crew," that's all forgotten. The financial crisis had that effect of-- that stuff is now off the-- down the memory hole.

BILL MOYERS: Do you really think they believe that unfettered capitalism, unregulated markets, will deliver an ideal democracy and prosperity for everybody?

THOMAS FRANK: No, I don't. I think that they believe that, and to some degree, they're sincere in that belief. But the conservative movement in Washington, I'm not talking about grassroots voters in Kansas here. I'm talking about the conservative movement in Washington. And the whole constellation of think tanks and lobby shops and not-for-profits. And, you know, newspapers and fundraisers and all of this stuff.

They believe this is an industry, okay? This is an industry that churns out this product. And one of the things that, I mean, it's one of the things that they're doing now is they excommunicate George W. Bush, deeply unpopular, so therefore, not a true conservative, right? So, that way they get to start over fresh. The problem with George W. Bush, the reason we're in such a deep hole is that we never went far enough.

As Tom DeLay has said, in his newspaper column, and I'm paraphrasing here. The problem with conservatism isn't that it was tried and failed. It's that it never really got-- we never really tried it in the first place. So, what we have to do -- and I've heard, conservatives have said this. "What we have to do is go back and deregulate all the way. We have to, you know, slash government. We have to tear that thing down. That's what it's all about."

And the amazing thing about this. This allows them to represent themselves as dissidents against the sort of established order in Washington. Even though they ran the established order for years and years and years and years.

BILL MOYERS: Here's something else that's bizarre to me. And I wonder what you think about it, as a historian. I mean, right after the failed terrorist threat of Christmas, Obama's critics went to work scrubbing what happened when the Bush White House was out to lunch in the weeks and days leading up to 9/11.

I mean, you know, there were terrorists sneaking into the country. There were warnings from the intelligence community about something-- an attack on an American city coming. And that's all been flushed down the memory hole. Giuliani goes on the air and says, "We didn't have any terrorist attacks when Bush was President."

THOMAS FRANK: Yeah, and that's another-- we also forget the anthrax episode which happened right after 9/11. Look, this is not an argument that I have made. That other people have-- that all of these things need to be added to the list of government failures. And if you want to talk why does government fail? You know, there's two answers out there.

One is the conservative answer. Government fails because that's the nature of government to fail. And if you want to look a little bit deeper, you know, why does government fail? Because government has been systematically destroyed. When we, whether you're talking about the, you know, the pay gap and making-- deliberately making government an unattractive career option. Or you're talking about outsourcing.

This is another conservative strategy for dealing with the state. If you hate and despise government employees. And you understand them as, you know, unbelievable human wickedness, right? What do you do about them? Well, the answer's obvious. And at the same time, you believe in the market. You believe that private industry does everything better. You outsource the Federal workforce.

BILL MOYERS: Have we reached a stage where you make things bad enough that people despair and then you manipulate their despair into-- to your own advantage in the next election?

THOMAS FRANK: It's a cynical town, Washington, D.C. And the conservative movement tends to be deeply, deeply, deeply cynical about government. Now, it's also, I mean, deeply idealistic about the market. I mean, the market can do no wrong, almost by definition. But government they regard as a criminal gang. I mean, many, many conservatives have compared-- oh, they always do, compare government to criminals. All the time.

Taxation is a form of theft. It's as bad as a mugger in the street saying, "Give me your money." And America is pretty much unique among the nations in that our political system, half of our political system is basically dedicated to the destruction of the government from within. I don't know any other country where that's the case. But there's plenty of countries where government works really, really well. I mean, even, for God's sake, in India, you know, which we don't think of as being an advanced industrial society, their banks didn't all go bust in the latest downturn. Now, why is that?

Because their equivalent of the Federal Reserve was not, you know, deregulating, stopping enforcement. They weren't doing any of those things. They were keeping a very tight lid on it. Government can work. It works all the time.

BILL MOYERS: You wrote "What's the Matter with Kansas?" Let me ask you to broaden that canvas and ask, with the answer to the question, what's the matter with America that we tolerate all of this?

THOMAS FRANK: I think a large part of it is that-- well, it's the chronic historical forgetting, you know? We just elected Barack Obama in this-- you know, he had quite a mandate. You know, biggest majority of any President since Reagan. And now a year later, and the public is already turning on him. And that's a part of the problem.

But, you know, another part of it is that the conservative argument about government and freedom is very compelling when they say that something like, you know, the national, you know, any proposal for a national health program is a violation of our freedom. Americans don't like to hear that their freedom is being violated. That is a hot button argument. Now, the obvious-- look, there's an obvious response that Democrats could make. Which is no, this is a way of growing our freedom. This will actually expand human freedom, not limit it. They never say that.

BILL MOYERS: Why? So, part of the problem with America is the Democratic Party?

THOMAS FRANK: A huge part of the problem, because look, the conservatives have for decades now made their-- the whole point of their party is to attack government, attack the state, encourage cynicism about government. And then wreck it when they're in charge, right?

Democrats never defend the state. They never come out and say, "No, no. It's important to have, you know, government. It's important to have a Department of Labor. These are, you know, having government actually-- a good government increases your freedom. It doesn't ruin it." They never fight back consistently.

BILL MOYERS: Why?

THOMAS FRANK: I think they're-- some of them do. You've got members of Congress here and there that do. But by and large, the prominent leading Democrats in our society don't do that. Why is that? Because I think that would get them in trouble with their funders. I mean, the power of money is huge in the political system. You know, despite all the efforts that have been made over the years to get money out of politics. It's still immensely powerful.

BILL MOYERS: The book is Thomas Frank, "The Wrecking Crew." The literary journal is "The Baffler." Congratulations on both of them. And thanks for being with me on the Journal.

THOMAS FRANK: It was my pleasure.

Bill Moyers is president of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.

http://www.alternet.org/story/145249/bi ... age=entire



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/19/10 6:27 am • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
i am getting ill reading this. what hope is there in this?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/19/10 6:38 am • # 3 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
The hope, at least for me, is in the old adage: "The truth shall set us free."

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/19/10 6:41 am • # 4 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
sooz08 wrote:
The hope, at least for me, is in the old adage: "The truth shall set us free."

Sooz

but how can we fight this, sooz? i guess we can fight it the way Jews fight the holocost deniers- by ramming the truth of it right back in their face, with energetic defiance.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/19/10 6:43 am • # 5 
R E M E M B E R


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/19/10 6:49 am • # 6 
...and I should add:

FIGHT BACK!


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/19/10 9:00 am • # 7 
We can talk about the repubs and continue to play their game and blame them for everything. Or, we can show the positive of the dems, how the dems can correct the problems. Right now all that's coming from either side is negative in my opinion. You can talk to the dems, they already know the right lies. You can talk to the right, they either believe the lies or simply don't care that their people lie. Then there's the independents. What they are seeing is that both sides suck and are playing the negative game instead of coming up with positive solutions. There are important elections coming up this year. We can try to be the lesser of evils or we can be a positive with real solutions. It isn't positive to try to ram things through without people even being able to read them first. It isn't positive to sign a budget bill full of pork when you ran on the idea of change. Just playing defense will not win the elections this year.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/19/10 9:39 am • # 8 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
I mostly agree with your comments, Katy ~ the troubling part for me is taking the high road only to be mowed down like cardboard cutouts via political games and dishonest virulent rhetoric ~ the health care fiasco is a good example of that ~ "some" even see bringing the truth out as "dirty politics" ~ gwb circumvented MANY contentious issues via executive orders and recess appointments, and he never faced 100% opposition on everything ~ I resented those actions ~ but I'm leaning to seeing the value to them ~

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/19/10 9:44 am • # 9 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
There is no way any of us can change the past ~ we can, hopefully, see the error of our ways and work our butts off to correct those errors ~ I strongly believe the "blame game" would cease, or at least greatly diminish, if the Rs took responsibility for anything and started to negotiate/vote with country as a whole in mind as opposed to their personal political lives ~

Sooz


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/19/10 9:49 am • # 10 
The problem is that the economy totally collapsed on the Bush watch and it is not fixable with a snap of the fingers. There's no magic cure. People have very limited attention spans and even more limited interest in delving into the "hows" and "whys" things occur. The economy is recovering and it has been since March. Everyone is stating doom and gloom, but that's to win votes and remain relavent.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/19/10 10:14 am • # 11 
My problem with all of this is I don't understand who you think the idiots are convincing. The country elected Obama. Do you think they've changed their minds and will now believe the rhetoric of the right wing fanatics? Do you think you can change the minds of the people who believe the lies? Have we dumbed down since Obama was elected? I didn't support Obama. He has done nothing to make me change my mind. That doesn't mean I'm going to turn stupid and believe the lies of right wing idiots. There are independents. They are the important ones. They need some positive sign from ones side or the other. It would be nice if both sides gave positive ideas but that won't happen. In my opinion, as an independent myself, if we don't get positive and real change, then we will vote to balance the power which means the dems will lose the senate, the house or both. Blaming the repubs doesn't get people jobs. Blaming the dems doesn't get people jobs. Something does need to change. Who is going to give us that. So far, nobody. There are enough dem idiots in the Congress that I could easily see we need to make sure they don't have 100% of the power.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/19/10 1:15 pm • # 12 
There's no question that Thomas Frank paints a pretty bleak picture, and me being the cynic I am when it comes to politics, I'm inclined to agree with him. People have the attention span of a gnat when it comes to the broader social realities. We go from one tragedy or issue to the next seamlessly as the screen fades to black and the next commercial comes on. For the broader population, thought patterns have morphed from "sober second thought" and "research" down to "six second sound bytes". When it comes to politics and politicians, their handlers know this - so the goal becomes finding the right phrase at the right time to define the opposition and frame what passes for debate.

We've heard it many times, "a week is a lifetime in politics" and that's true because people can be swayed so easily. It's sad really. Remember "Read my lips..."? George senior knew he'd have to raise taxes at some point but he lied because that's what the public wanted to hear. Until he acted on his lie, then the opposing side comes out with "you lied!" They kept up the simple "you lied" all the way to the next election, and poor George was never able to shake that mantle. The fact is, politicians have always known that the "truth" is the kiss of death - so they all lie.

So... how does that square with Obama? I for one was never under the illusion that Obama would be able to accomplish everything he campaigned on. To do so would be to create the greatest social upheaval and change since before written history. Taken all together, what Obama was calling for in the election would never happen because it would mean every single person in every single role in life having the time and courage to redefine who they are and what they do... it ain't going to happen.

But... I still supported him because I knew then (and now) that even if he were to accomplish a tiny fraction of what he set out to do, it would be a damned sight better than what the other guy was offering - more of the same.

If we've come to the point where it seems that the best politicians are essentially the best liars, I also don't think that's an indictment served solely on politicians - the public shares the blame. Today, people can't be bothered with details. When some politician spouts an out and out lie, they're not rushing to factcheck.org or taking the time to verify what they're being told. They're too wrapped up in their own lives - so much so that for them, it's enough to respond to six-second sound bytes on the 6 o'clock news.

It's no different up here in the frozen white north. Recently, the Liberal Party selected an "intellectual" as a leader. Right off the bat, the Conservatives had him pegged as weak and timid. There wasn't even an election in the offing and they ran ads day after day with Stéphan Dion looking weak and rather wimpish. When Dion announced the new Liberal platform - calling for a shift in taxation to account for carbon emmissions - the Conservatives called it simply "a carbon tax". They conveniently avoided the details of the plan and just kept hitting "the carbon tax". They brought it up and called it that in every interview or press conference. They controlled the message throughout the election and needless to say, Stéphan Dion and the "Carbon Shift Plan" went down to humiliating defeat.

My point is, they're going to lie. It comes with the territory. And far be it from me to expect them to be perfect human beings who always tell the truth. So instead of holding them to account for their lies, I look at the general direction they want to take the country. And just as I didn't like where I saw George Bush taking America, I don't like where I see our current Prime Minister taking my country. I know the current Liberal leader still needs to get his political feet wet, but I much prefer his "vision" of Canada than what I see coming out of the Conservative party. So even though Michael Ignateuff will lie... I'm OK with that. I fully expect him too. But I also fully expect he would take this country down a much more amenable path than I see us going today.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/19/10 3:50 pm • # 13 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
you know what is funny? people may have gone to the booth thinking that Obama would make things better, but he never actually said that on the campaign trail. what he said is that he would stop the bleeding basically. and ime, he has.

this may turn out to be a blip on the radar, or it could be quite serious for Democrats, if they don't learn from it. but what concerns me is what they may take away from it.

the teabaggers are going to have a field day with this. that much is certain.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/20/10 6:41 am • # 14 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188
It isn't positive to try to ram things through without people even being able to read them first.

What, specifically, are you talking about here?

If anything were being "rammed through" it would be done already.

As for this notion that once upon a time every politician read every line of every bill before voting on it- when and where did that ever happen? lol


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/20/10 11:24 am • # 15 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
Chaos333 wrote:
It isn't positive to try to ram things through without people even being able to read them first.

What, specifically, are you talking about here?

If anything were being "rammed through" it would be done already.

As for this notion that once upon a time every politician read every line of every bill before voting on it- when and where did that ever happen? lol
straight up. i am actually mad that he DIDN'T ram this through. again, an illustration of how NOT radical he is.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 15 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.