It is currently 04/11/25 6:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 2 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/22/10 3:32 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Here are the Inhofe comments I mentioned in chat last night ~ Sooz


By [url=/author/Alex%20Seitz-Wald]Alex Seitz-Wald[/url] on Jan 21st, 2010 at 4:30 pm
Inhofe: 'I believe in racial and ethnic profiling' because 'all terrorists are Muslims or Middle Easterners.'

Since the Fort Hood shootings and the failed Christmas Day terror attack, some on the right have called for more racial and ethnic "profiling" and "discrimination," saying that the Obama administration is more interested in "protecting the rights of terrorists" than "protecting the lives of Americans." Today during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing looking into the Fort Hood rampage, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) became perhaps the most powerful proponent of outright ethnic profiling, saying it's "by and large true" that "all terrorists are Muslims or Middle Easterners":

Quote:

INHOFE: I'm, for one - I know it's not politically correct to say it - I believe in racial and ethnic profiling. I think if you're looking at people getting on an airplane and you have X amount of resources to get into it, you get at the targets, and not my wife. And I just think it's something that should be looked into. The statement that's made, it's probably 90 percent true with some exceptions like the Murrah federal office building in my state, Oklahoma. Those people, they were not Muslims, they were not Middle Easterners. But when you hear that not all Middle Easterners or Muslims between the age of 20 and 35 are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims or Middle Easterners between the age of 20 and 35, that's by and large true.

Watch it:

In addition to being an affront to civil rights, ethic profiling is ineffective. Inhofe says he is worried about limited resources, but ethnic profiling actually wastes law enforcement resources by chasing false targets. Moreover, many terrorists - including "shoe bomber" Richard Reid, al Qaeda recruit Adam Pearlman, and "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski - don't fit Inhofe's profile. As former Bush Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told NPR last month, the recent Christmas Day bombing attempt illustrated "the danger and the foolishness of profiling because people's conception of what a potential terrorist looks like often doesn't match reality." (HT: Washington Independent)

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/21/inhofe-profiling/



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/22/10 8:14 am • # 2 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
But think about the number of votes that can garner when one blames the "other". Murricans don't neet to accept responsibility for their own actions when forever blaming the "other".


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 2 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.