It is currently 04/11/25 6:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 6 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/23/10 10:15 am • # 1 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 11/07/09
Posts: 720
i found this today in our local paper and thought it was excellent

January 22, 2010

LEONARD PITTS JR.

Conservatives without conscience

BY LEONARD PITTS JR.
McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

As babies were being pulled, crushed and broken, from the rubble.

As people lay writhing on cardboard mats, gashed and moaning under the sun.

As families placed their loved ones out at the curb for pick-up, like garbage.

As Haiti reeled and staggered and the rest of the world rushed to the aid of a humble, beleaguered people, two icons of American conservatism reared up last week and offered analyses of the earthquake that has devastated the impoverished island nation. The Rev. Pat Robertson opined on his program, "The 700 Club," that Haiti's woes stem from the fact that it made a deal with the devil two centuries ago and now is "cursed." Rush Limbaugh suggested the relief effort would "play right into" President Barack Obama's hands, allowing him to appear "humanitarian, compassionate" and thus "burnish" his standing within the African-American community.

It left me wondering whether conservatism has a conscience, whether conservatism has a soul.

Yes, it is a fundamentally unfair question, if only because conservatives like columnist Kathleen Parker and TV personality Elisabeth Hasselbeck of "The View" promptly took the men to task.

And yet this is hardly the first time this has happened. To the contrary, it has become routine that after disasters, both natural and human, icons of conservatism spout hateful, hurtful, cynical words, words that belittle the victims and trivialize the suffering.

As in Neal Boortz blaming the tragedy of Hurricane Katrina on the "worthless parasites" who lived in New Orleans.

As in Michael Savage reportedly saying the United States should not send "one nickel" of aid to South Asia when a tsunami killed 226,000 people because it is "a hotbed of radical Islam."

As in Jerry Falwell blaming the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that took 3,000 lives on gays, feminism, abortion and the ACLU.

And if it is unfair to question conservatism's possession of conscience and soul, perhaps one can be forgiven for simply wondering what is this weird reflex, this bizarre tic, that seems to repeatedly compel its most high-profile adherents to victimize victims. Social conservatives -- we know this, because they tell us repeatedly -- are righteous people, people gifted with a higher morality than the ordinary run of human beings.

But one sees little of that great-heartedness in the aftermath of tragedy.

Apparently, some are so estranged from their very humanity, so besotted with their own righteousness, so deeply, damnably smug, self-centered, small and mean, that there is nothing they will not reduce to cheap morality plays to further their cultural and political agendas. Tens of thousands of people are dead in the poorest place in the Western Hemisphere, and the preacher asks: How can that be used to buttress my vision of a vengeful, angry God? Relief is being rushed to the island, and the bloviator wonders: How can that be used to belittle Barack Obama?

Apparently, there's never a timeout, never a pause button, never a moment when they remember to simply behave like human beings. A human being, faced with calamity on this scale, says, "Oh, my God." A human being says, "Those poor people." A human being says, "What can I do to help?"

But the Limbaughs and Robertsons of the world say some variation of, "God hates you." Or, "You had it coming." They call that conservative.

I call it obscene.

LEONARD PITTS JR. is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla. 33132. Write to him at lpitts@miamiherald.com.
http://www.freep.com/print/article/20100122/OPINION03/1220329/Conservatives-without-conscience



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/23/10 10:38 am • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
They may call themselves conservative, but it's their assholeism that prompts them to say the hateful things they do. They do bastard for a living.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/23/10 10:46 am • # 3 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Don't be so insulting to assholeism.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/23/10 11:24 am • # 4 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Leonard Pitts Jr is one of my favorites ~ his observations are often tough and always honest, but are never mean-spirited ~ and, as here, he is the first to say "it's unfair to say ALL" ~ my answer to what Pitts identifies as "this weird reflex, this bizarre tic, that seems to repeatedly compel its most high-profile adherents to victimize victims" is money and notoriety, which translates into more money ~ today's alleged celebrity "conservatives" compete with each other to be the "baddest, most outrageous" because that translates to big audiences and bigger bucks, which I see as a very dangerous game ~ the problem of course is that their core audiences have a high proportion of unbalanced people sharing the same burning bigotry and hatred ~ and that burning bigotry and hatred is stoked by the Limbaugh/Beck/Boortz/Drudge/Savage words as a "call to action" ~ I know and respect many real conservatives who are smart and funny and loving and generous ~ and who loathe the rabid hatred and bigotry and dishonesty being spewed in the name of "conservatism" ~ but it's a [sad] fact that in today's world of any ideology, everyone of any other "ism" is painted with the same brush ~ just like in 1st or 2d grade ~ for me, Robertson and Falwell and other evangelicals are in a different category ~ I believe they believe what they are preaching ~ and that is at least equally dangerous to playing games ~ all are great examples of why I am not comfortable with fanatics of ANY ilk ~    

My introduction to Pitts was a piece he wrote in the days following 09/11/01 ~ it remains one of the most eloquent op-eds I've ever read ~

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/23/10 11:26 am • # 5 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
LMAO ~ I stand corrected ~ gramps is right: what we are witnessing are raging out-of-control cases of ... assholeism ~ Image

Sooz



Top
  
PostPosted: 01/23/10 11:42 am • # 6 
So the next time someone posts something about Palin, can I call her an asshole? - or - do I have to fear being banned? [img]/domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/wink.gif[/img]


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 6 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.