It is currently 04/13/25 4:10 pm

Board index » January - December, 2010

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 9 posts ]
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Offline sooz06
PostPosted: 01/27/10 11:57 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
This is why I don't lie ~ when you get caught [and you will ... eventually], you must [a] admit you lied, or pretend you were "misquoted" [but video clips can be a problem] or "misunderstood" or "wish you had used different words", or [c] lie again to support your prior lie, which gets very complicated and you have to remember what you said to who ~ [b]but if you tell the truth, you don't need to waste brain space remembering anything ~Image~ someone should explain this difference
Top
  
Quote  
 Offline macroscopic
PostPosted: 01/27/10 6:33 pm • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
HIS plan? Obama has no plan. he has GUIDELINES, dillhole!
Top
  
Quote  
 Offline macroscopic
PostPosted: 01/27/10 6:41 pm • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
moreover, Obama's approval ratings are TWENTY PERCENT HIGHER in MA than in the US in general.
Top
  
Quote  
kathyk1024
PostPosted: 01/28/10 5:17 am • # 4 
Seventy percent of voters said they want Brown to work with Democrats, 52 percent said they were satisfied with Obama's agenda, and 68 percent (including a majority of Brown voters), approve of Massachusetts' health care program, which contains many of the same elements contained in federal proposals.

Then why did they vote for this guy?????
Top
  
Quote  
 Offline macroscopic
PostPosted: 01/28/10 6:59 am • # 5 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
kathy1024 wrote:
Seventy percent of voters said they want Brown to work with Democrats, 52 percent said they were satisfied with Obama's agenda, and 68 percent (including a majority of Brown voters), approve of Massachusetts' health care program, which contains many of the same elements contained in federal proposals.

Then why did they vote for this guy?????

ignorance. 
Top
  
Quote  
kathyk1024
PostPosted: 01/28/10 7:19 am • # 6 

I think sooz said she had something that had a semi-logical explanation.  I still don't get it.  The people of MA are generally not religious loons and are generally more interested in education and healthcare than waging war.  Do they think the truly obstructionist Republican party is going to allow Brown to work with democrats?  They are angry?  I still don't know what they are angry about.

I am FURIOUS at them for insuring gridlock. WTF!!!

 
Top
  
Quote  
the monster
PostPosted: 01/28/10 6:06 pm • # 7 
kathy1024 wrote:
Seventy percent of voters said they want Brown to work with Democrats, 52 percent said they were satisfied with Obama's agenda, and 68 percent (including a majority of Brown voters), approve of Massachusetts' health care program, which contains many of the same elements contained in federal proposals.

Then why did they vote for this guy?????


Because of who the alternative was, maybe?
Top
  
Quote  
kathyk1024
PostPosted: 01/29/10 5:38 am • # 8 
Monster - Do people usually care about the personality of your Senator?  Lautenberg is as old as dirt and is probably a dick. He's not know for his sparkling personality.  He's got a great rags to riches story and he took on Bush.  So of course I voted for him. 

Tom Kean Jr v Menendez came up while Bush was in office.  I liked Tom Kean Sr as governor.  He was a moderate and ran the state well during his tenure, plus I liked his work on the 9/11 commission.  Then his son Tom Kean Jr was involved in running for Senate in 2006.  Could I vote for an R when the republicans were all playing lock step with Bush????   Absolutely, positively not.  Kean JR was probably a great guy, but the politics of the RNC would never allow me to vote for him.    So Menendez it was.

Mass expects Brown to work with dems.  They should have known better. 
Top
  
Quote  
 Offline macroscopic
PostPosted: 01/29/10 6:33 am • # 9 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
kathy1024 wrote:
Monster - Do people usually care about the personality of your Senator?  Lautenberg is as old as dirt and is probably a dick. He's not know for his sparkling personality.  He's got a great rags to riches story and he took on Bush.  So of course I voted for him. 

Tom Kean Jr v Menendez came up while Bush was in office.  I liked Tom Kean Sr as governor.  He was a moderate and ran the state well during his tenure, plus I liked his work on the 9/11 commission.  Then his son Tom Kean Jr was involved in running for Senate in 2006.  Could I vote for an R when the republicans were all playing lock step with Bush????   Absolutely, positively not.  Kean JR was probably a great guy, but the politics of the RNC would never allow me to vote for him.    So Menendez it was.

Mass expects Brown to work with dems.  They should have known better. 

i agree.  the fact that 62% "want" something that is pretty much a non-starter should have put the 62% on the side of the Dem.
Top
  
Quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 9 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

Board index » January - December, 2010

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.