It is currently 04/11/25 6:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 5 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/01/10 7:27 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
There is no question that Cameron Douglas has a very significant and very serious problem ~ but there is also no question in my mind that our drug laws are "iffy", at best ~ while every case is different and some obviously offer more in the way of plea-bargaining results, I have a significant problem with some of the plea-bargaining tactics used/practiced regularly ~ personally, I'd be okay with sentencing most users to rehab and X amount of community service time ~ Sooz


AlterNet / By Anthony Papa

Michael Douglas's Son Faces More Time Than a Murderer or a Rapist for a Nonviolent Drug Charge

The government is hell-bent on punishing Cameron Douglas for the crime of being an addict.

January 31, 2010   |   Who benefits from Cameron Douglas getting at least 10 years in prison? No one. But the government is hell-bent on punishing him for the crime of being an addict.

Cameron -- the son of Academy Award winner Michael Douglas -- took a guilty plea this week for dealing drugs that will land him in prison for at least 10 years to a maximum of life. This stems from a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) investigation based on information from unidentified informants who were methamphetamine users and drug dealers. In other words, these rats gave Cameron up to save their own hides. In exchange for agreeing to be cooperating witnesses against Cameron, they were allowed to plead guilty to lesser charges.

I am mad as hell! Why? In the 1980s, I faced a similar fate that led to my 15-to-life sentence for a first-time, nonviolent drug sale in New York. So I know too well the routine the DEA went through to rope Douglas into a corner forcing him to take a plea deal. They scared the living crap out of him, telling him he would never see the light of day if he went to trial. Why would anyone in their right mind plead out to a 10-year minimum sentence? In the U.S., this type of behavior is standard in procuring drug convictions of low-level drug offenders who wind up doing more time than a murderer or rapist.

A good friend of Cameron Douglas told me that Douglas has been hooked on heroin for the last several years. Why else would he compel his girlfriend to bring over a toothbrush box containing 20 bags of dope while he was under house arrest several months ago? He needs drug treatment, not a decade or more of hard time in prison.

The U.S. is obsessed with punishing individuals like Douglas. I think his imprisonment is immoral and counterproductive to public safety. By locking up Douglas and those like him, our government is wasting resources that could otherwise be used to stop violent crime.

Today, there are over 500,000 Americans locked up for nonviolent drug law violations. The cost of incarcerating such individuals is draining state and federal budgets and producing idiotic solutions by politicians to make up for its burgeoning costs -- like the recent cuts in health care, education, and other social service programs.

It will cost tax payers an estimated $45,000 a year to keep him in prison. His family and friends will no doubt mourn their loss while Douglas rots away in a federal prison for being a nonviolent drug addict.

Should we treat drug addiction as a criminal matter or a medical problem? For most people, treatment is a much more effective way to overcome addiction, yet our prisons are full of drug-addicted individuals. Nonviolent drug offenders should be given an opportunity to receive treatment, not jail time, for their drug use. This would be a more effective and affordable solution for the individual and the community.

Thanks to the war on drugs, and especially mandatory minimum sentencing policies, average drug offenders like Cameron Douglas are sentenced to extraordinary amounts of time in prison. We need to end these draconian drug laws by offering drug-addicted individuals treatment instead of prison.


Top
  
PostPosted: 02/01/10 9:12 am • # 2 
I'm sick to death of drug laws or the "war" on drugs. It needs an entire re-think. It's a waste of lives and a waste of money.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/02/10 4:01 am • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
First of all, we need to attack and abolish most of the federal drug laws.  These carry the harshest minmum sentences and unless someone is running an interstate drug enterprise they do not belong in federal court.  Second, each state's laws need to be looked and revised to reflect the differences between a drug user/ sharer, and a dealer profiting from a criminal enterprise.  In Maryland, the definition of distribution covers two people smoking a joint together.  The second offense results in a mandatory 10 year sentence.  What a waste of taxpayers' money to keep someone like that in jail for 10 years.

On the bright side, most states have implemented problem solving court models, often referred to as drug courts  These models combine treatment with close judicial oversight and sanctions and incentives for negative and positive behaviors.  The federal Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) provide grant money for these programs. I know our # 1 job here is to save the taxpayers money, reudce crime through drug treatment, and keep people out of the detention center which costs approximately $80/day per inmate.


Top
  
PostPosted: 02/02/10 5:48 am • # 4 
Multiply that by the number of people in the prison system for related drug offenses. Wanna cut back government? There's a good place to start. But it won't happen because the whole police, justice and incarceration industry would end up on the bread lines.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/02/10 6:27 am • # 5 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
Sidartha wrote:
Multiply that by the number of people in the prison system for related drug offenses. Wanna cut back government? There's a good place to start. But it won't happen because the whole police, justice and incarceration industry would end up on the bread lines.
Not a problem here.  The system is overcrowded and the money for expansion has been cut out of the budget repeatedly.  They are opening the doors early for nearly everyone.  They are begging us to keep people out.

  


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 5 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.