gopqed wrote:
Is she a bimbo?
I'm not sure. Did she say that she disagreed with some USSC decisions without being able to name a single one? Did she allow herself to be put in front of a dark background, in a dark suit (with everything except a big pointy hat) to tell the world that she isn't a witch?
Here is how O'Donnell earned the bimbo tag.
From David Knowles at AOLnews.
Where better to learn about the U.S. Constitution than at a law school?
Unfortunately for Delaware Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell, that
education -- which came at Delaware's Widener Law on Thursday -- was
courtesy of her opponent in the race, Democrat Chris Coons, in the midst
of their second debate.
After scolding Coons for his lack of knowledge of constitutional law for
stating that intelligent design should not be taught in public schools
(a matter decided in a scathing decision in the case of
Kitzmiller v. Dover School District),
O'Donnell challenged her rival on his assertion that the U.S.
Constitution creates a distinct separation between church and state.
"Where in the Constitution is separation of church and state?" O'Donnell
asked. Upon hearing her words, the audience in the room burst into
laughter.
Later in the proceedings, after fielding questions on the candidates' views on
repealing the 14th, 16th and 17th Amendments, Coons returned the conversation to the question of the constitutionally mandated separation of church and state.
Quote:
"I absolutely oppose the widespread proposals by tea party
candidates for us to repeal the 14th, 16th or 17th amendments." Coons
said. "I also think you just heard, in the answers from my opponent, and
in her attempt at saying 'where is the separation of church and state
in the constitution' reveals her fundamental misunderstanding of what
our Constitution is, how it is amended and how it evolved. The First
Amendment establishes the separation, the fact that the federal
government shall not establish any religion, and decisional law by the
Supreme Court over many, many decades --"
O' Donnell then interrupted. "The First Amendment does?" she asked, skeptically.
Coons continued his explanation, and O'Donnell interrupted again. "So
you're telling me that the separation of church and state is found in
the First Amendment?"
Coons went on to cite cases the Supreme Court had decided that backed up the position of a wall between church and state.
"Let me just clarify," O'Donnell pressed. "You're telling me that the
separation of church and state is found in the First Amendment?"
"The government shall make no establishment of religion," Coons said,
summarizing the gist of the specific words in the First Amendment's
establishment clause.
"That's in the First Amendment?" O'Donnell asked again, eliciting further laughter from the room.
http://www.aolnews.com/20...stion-floors-debate-aud/You can go to that link and watch the vid if you like.
GOP may enjoy the contrarian opinions posted by right wing sites that try and put a smiley face on O'Donnell's 'bimboism'.