It is currently 04/11/25 6:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Go to page Previous  1, 2   Page 2 of 2   [ 38 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/24/11 1:12 pm • # 26 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
I noticed that as well.
I wonder if CNN answered.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/24/11 1:34 pm • # 27 
It is a good question. She is so disruptive. I see now she has just released her own budget for our nation.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/24/11 2:01 pm • # 28 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Can she count?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/24/11 2:02 pm • # 29 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
Her own budget for the nation?  I don't think that will be sufficient.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/24/11 2:03 pm • # 30 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
Maybe if we cut the sedative portion of it.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/25/11 11:01 am • # 31 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
CNN seems to be trying to 'out Fox' Fox, which I see as the exactly wrong goal ~ Image ~ emphasis/bolding below [except the title] is mine ~ Sooz

DUELING SOTU RESPONSES, CONT'D.... Late last week, after New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) turned them down, congressional Republican leaders announced House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would deliver the party's official response to President Obama's State of the Union address. It was a decision fraught with implications.

But immediately after the announcement, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) made some news of her own: she, too, would deliver a response to the SOTU, and her speech would be broadcast and endorsed by the Tea Party Express.

Yesterday, the unhinged Minnesotan insisted she isn't trying to steal Paul Ryan's thunder.

Quote:

[S]peaking to reporters Monday, she distanced herself from Beltway rumblings that she was challenging the GOP establishment by addressing the Tea Party Express. Rep. Paul Ryan is offering the official Republican response.

"I'm just reacting to what President Obama is saying, to the Tea Party Express group," Bachmann said at the State Capitol. "It's not meant to be in competition in any way. Paul Ryan is the official GOP response and he'll do a wonderful job."

But there's an important detail to keep in mind. Politico noted that Bachmann's "response will be streamed on the Tea Party Express's web site, while Ryan's will be carried by national networks."

As it turns out, that's no longer accurate. CNN announced late yesterday that it will broadcast all three speeches -- President Obama's national address, Ryan's response, and Bachmann's response -- on the air, in their entirety.

I'm really not sure what to make of this. In fact, I'm a little surprised CNN would agree to this, just as a matter of fairness -- viewers will hear one speech from a Democrat, followed by a speech by a far-right Republican, and then followed by another speech by a far-right Republican? If a liberal Dem announced this morning that he/she is delivering some remarks reflecting on the SOTU tonight, would that also be aired on CNN's national airwaves in its entirety?

For that matter, I can only hope that Paul Ryan isn't positioned as the "middle" -- literally and figuratively -- between the president and Bachman. The Ayn Rand acolyte is, after all, a hard-core radical, intent on destroying Medicare and Social Security. Bachmann's wild-eyed craziness shouldn't make Ryan appear reasonable by comparison, but it might.

On the flip side, I suppose it's also possible that we'll see one popular national leader reveling in the pageantry of a national address to a joint session, followed by two right-wing members of an unpopular party, struggling to explain why Americans should embrace their vision of extremism. If President Obama comes out looking above the fray, the dueling GOP responses might backfire.

I guess we'll see soon enough.

—Steve Benen 8:35 AM January 25, 2011

http://www.washingtonmont...idual/2011_01/027680.php


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/25/11 11:06 am • # 32 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
This is a great commentary, demolishing CNN's 'rationale' with surgical precision ~ Sooz

CNN'S WEAK RATIONALE FOR DUELING SOTU RESPONSES.... I didn't intend to return to the subject, but CNN's explanation for why it's airing two Republican responses to President Obama's State of the Union address is pretty odd.

To briefly recap, congressional Republican leaders announced last week that House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would deliver the party's official response to the president's national address. Soon after, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) said she, too, would deliver a response to the SOTU, and her speech would be broadcast and endorsed by the Tea Party Express.

NBC, CBS, ABC, and Fox will air Obama's speech, followed by Ryan's speech. CNN, however, will air all three -- the president's address, followed by a speech by a far-right Republican, and then followed by another speech by a different far-right Republican

This afternoon, Greg Sargent got an official explanation from CNN:

Quote:

"The Tea Party has become a major force in American politics and within the Republican Party. Hearing the Tea Party's perspective on the State of the Union is something we believe CNN's viewers will be interested in hearing and we are happy to include this perspective as one of many in tonight's coverage."

As justifications go, I'd hoped CNN would do better than this.

There are a couple of angles to this that are worth keeping in mind. The first is that CNN seems to be treating Tea Party activists as offering something unique -- almost as if it's a distinct political party with a perspective all its own. Major media outlets need to understand how very wrong this is -- the so-called Tea Party is another name for "the Republican base." There is no meaningful, qualitative difference, and as a result, CNN is airing two Republican responses to one presidential speech.

The second is that airing a bizarre speech from an unhinged, radical lawmaker -- who CNN already knows to be unreliable -- because Tea Partiers are "a major force" is a weak rationale. The problem isn't just that this is tantamount to saying the Republican base is "a major force," it's also overlooking the fact that there are plenty of "major forces" in American politics.

Would CNN be inclined to air a SOTU response from the AFL-CIO? Labor unions are a major political force. How about responses from the NRA and the U.S. Chamber or Commerce? They're major forces, too. There are plenty of major forces, with constituencies focused on abortion, the environment, the wars, etc. They can't all have rejoinders to the State of the Union aired on national television, which is why the other major networks are content to show Obama and the official GOP response.

Dave Weigel added that CNN has "a longstanding romance" with the Tea Party Express, the political action committee that organized and is sponsoring the Bachmann speech. That's true, and while it makes the announcement more predictable, it also makes this somehow worse.

In the meantime, Republicans on the Hill aren't exactly pleased with Bachmann or CNN, since all of this distracts from the GOP's message and muddles the party's response.

And the Republican effort to look like grown-ups takes another big step backwards.

—Steve Benen 4:45 PM January 25, 2011

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_01/027692.php


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/25/11 4:40 pm • # 33 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/23/09
Posts: 3185
Location: ontario canada
Is this the beginning of a three party system?

The centrals (dems), the conservatives (republicans), and the very silly party (the tea party)?


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/25/11 6:02 pm • # 34 
Did you all watch her speech?  Good heavens, she never looked at the camera.  You could tell she was reading straight from something.  And someone needs to tell her there is no cap and trade.  What was that all about?  She looked like the idiot she is.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/26/11 3:20 am • # 35 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
My personal reaction to Michele Bachmann is always a combined shudder and laugh at her idiocy ~ but her response last night was ... appalling and irresponsible in her continuing repetition of debunked 'facts' ~ she has a dismal lack of understanding ... not only of current and proposed policy but of history as well ~ I'll be at school for several hours today, but I hope the media goes thru her response, line by line, and 'outs' her for what she is: a strictly partisan liar ~ Image ~ Sooz

Bachmann's Response to State of the Union
January 25th, 2011
10:10 PM ET

As prepared for delivery:

Good evening, my name is Congresswoman Michele Bachmann from Minnesota's 6th District.

Two years ago, when Barack Obama became our President, unemployment was 7.8 percent and our national debt stood at what seemed like a staggering $10.6 trillion dollars.

We wondered whether the President would cut spending, reduce the deficit and implement real job-creating policies.

Unfortunately, the President's strategy for recovery was to spend a trillion dollars on a failed stimulus program, fueled by borrowed money.

The White House promised us that all the spending would keep unemployment under 8 percent.

Not only did that plan fail to deliver, but within three months the national jobless rate spiked to 9.4 percent. And sadly, it hasn't been lower for 20 straight months. While the government grew, we lost more than 2 million jobs.

Let me show you a chart. [CHART]

Here are unemployment rates over the past ten years. In October 2001, our national unemployment rate was at 5.3 percent. In 2008 it was at 6.6 percent. But, just eight months after President Obama promised lower unemployment, that rate spiked to a staggering 10.1 percent.

Today, unemployment is at 9.4 percent with about 400,000 new claims every week.

After the $700 billion bailout, the trillion-dollar stimulus, and the $410 billion spending bill with over 9,000 earmarks, many of you implored Washington to please stop spending money we don't have.

But, instead of cutting, we saw an unprecedented explosion of government spending and debt, unlike anything we have seen in the history of our country.

[CHART]

Deficits were unacceptably high under President Bush, but they exploded under President Obama's direction, growing the national debt by an astounding $3.1 trillion-dollars.

What did we buy?

Instead of a leaner, smarter government, we bought a bureaucracy that tells us which light bulbs to buy, and which will put 16,500 IRS agents in charge of policing President Obama's healthcare bill.

ObamaCare mandates and penalties will force many job creators to stop offering health insurance altogether, unless yours is one of the more-than-222 privileged companies or unions that has received a government waiver.

In the end, unless we fully repeal ObamaCare, a nation that currently enjoys the world's best healthcare may be forced to rely on government-run coverage that will have a devastating impact on our national debt for generations to come.

For two years President Obama made promises just like the ones we heard him make tonight. Yet still we have high unemployment, devalued housing prices and the cost of gasoline is skyrocketing.

Here are a few suggestions for fixing our economy:

The President could stop the EPA from imposing a job-destroying cap-and-trade system.

The President could support a Balanced Budget Amendment.

The President could agree to an energy policy that increases American energy production and reduces our dependence on foreign oil.

The President could also turn back some of the 132 regulations put in place in the last two years, many of which will cost our economy $100 million or more.

And, the President should repeal ObamaCare and support free market solutions like medical malpractice reform and allow all Americans to buy any healthcare policy they like anywhere in the United States.

We need to start making things again in this country, and we can do that by reducing the tax and regulatory burdens on job creators.

America will have the highest corporate tax rate in the world. Look no further to see why jobs are moving overseas.

But, thanks to you, there's reason to hope that real spending cuts are coming. Last November you went to the polls and voted out big-spending politicians and you put in their place men and women with a commitment to follow the Constitution and cut the size of government.

I believe that we are in the early days of a history-making turn.

Please know how important your calls, visits, and letters are to the maintenance of our liberties. Because of you, Congress responded and we are starting to undo the damage that's been done.

We believe in lower taxes, a limited view of government and the exceptionalism of America. And I believe America is the indispensible nation.

Just the creation of this nation was a miracle. Who's to say that we can't see a miracle again?

The perilous battle that was fought in the pacific, at Iwo Jima, was a battle against all odds, and yet the image of the young G.I.s in the incursion against the Japanese immortalizes their victory. These six young men raising the flag came to symbolize all of America coming together to beat back a totalitarian aggressor.

Our current debt crisis we face today is different, but we still need all of us to pull together. We can do this.

And that's the hope we hold tonight as Americans. We will push forward to reclaim the greatness of our country and to proclaim the liberty upon which we were founded.

And we will do so because we the people will never give up on this great nation.

God bless you, and God bless America.

http://politicalticker.bl...e-to-state-of-the-union/



Top
  
PostPosted: 01/26/11 3:24 am • # 36 
I just watched her "speech" and one thing struck me above all others:

Obama - opens with acknowledgements and condolences to Gabby Giffords

Ryan - opens with acknowledgements and condolences to Gabby Giffords

Bachmann - not a word about Giffords... not one...

Overall... what a freakin' air head.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/26/11 6:19 am • # 37 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
Iwo Jima?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/26/11 10:26 am • # 38 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
I think she's pandering to her base, which is several old people who, when they receive change at the dime store, still bite the quarters to make sure they're real. They have a framed picture of Gen Patton on the wall in the living room. They put the quarters in a sock between the mattress and the box spring.  And they keep a handgun in the bedroom, against the time when the government troops will come for their quarters.  Becasue they believe in the strict, originalist reading of the Constitution, which they are pretty sure explicitly forbids the government to send soldiers into citizens' homes looking for quarters (Amendment III).

They think tea is for sissies.


(Sorry to edit so many times, but we're dealing with the Comstitution here, and it's importnt to get it right)


Last edited by grampatom on 01/26/11 11:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

Go to page Previous  1, 2   Page 2 of 2   [ 38 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.