It is currently 04/11/25 6:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/05/11 3:32 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
What a shock! ~ think the future holds ... more? ~ Image ~ Sooz

HOUSE REPUBLICANS TO BREAK KEY PROMISE ON DAY 1.... When House Republican leaders unveiled their Pledge to America in September, it included a pretty striking promise to voters -- if elected, the GOP majority would "roll back government spending" by "at least $100 billion in the first year alone."

By all accounts, the figure was entirely arbitrary. It's not as if Republicans identified $100 billion in unnecessary spending and vowed to eliminate it, or identified some specific policy benefit associated with these cuts. The capricious goal was chosen because it was a round number. They thought it sounded nice, and voters would be impressed.

Regardless, GOP leaders touted the figure incessantly throughout the campaign season, and kept pushing it in the lead up to the new Congress. Indeed, as recently as last week, party leaders were not only sticking to the $100 billion figure, they insisted that they would make the cuts without touching defense, Social Security, or Medicare.

Even after confronted with evidence that such a goal would necessitate devastating cuts to education, health care, law enforcement, and transportation, House Republicans said they didn't care. After all, a promise is a promise, and this is a priority the GOP is willing to fight for.

Or rather, it was.

Monday, Republicans started slowly backing away from their $100 billion commitment. Yesterday, the pledge was effectively thrown out the window.

Quote:

Many people knowledgeable about the federal budget said House Republicans could not keep their campaign promise to cut $100 billion from domestic spending in a single year. Now it appears that Republicans agree. [...]

Now aides say that the $100 billion figure was hypothetical, and that the objective is to get annual spending for programs other than those for the military, veterans and domestic security back to the levels of 2008, before Democrats approved stimulus spending to end the recession.

Oh, I see. Republican pledges are "hypothetical" promises. The Pledge to America must have included asterisks and disclaimers in font so small, the country missed the caveats.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), the ranking member on the House Budget Committee, said, "I think they woke up to the reality that this will have a direct negative impact on people's lives.... You know, it's easy to talk about these things in the abstract. It's another thing when you start taking away people's college loans and Pell Grants or cutting early education programs."

To be sure, I'm delighted Republicans aren't actually going to pursue this indefensible goal. When political leaders start breaking high-profile promises right out of the gate, it's generally not a positive development, but in this case, we're all better off with GOP leaders having changed their minds.

Of course, this doesn't change the fact that Republicans never should have made this promise to begin with, and shouldn't have put themselves in a position in which they're breaking their own pledge immediately after taking office.

—Steve Benen 8:00 AM January 5, 2011

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archiv ... 027383.php


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/05/11 4:00 am • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188
The number they pulled out of their asses means nothing, nor do "broken promises". All they have to do is thump the bible, wave the flag, stick to the pre-approved talking points and say "constitution" 12 times a day and all will be forgiven by their supporters as long as Obama and those damn evil liberals are taught a lesson about who's in charge around here!

The ruin of this President, personally and professionally, has been their publicly stated primary goal for quite a while. They just tossed in some big words so it would sound good.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/05/11 10:22 am • # 3 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
LMAO ~ the 'dialing back on promises' began before the new Congress was even sworn in ~ and so the tap-dancing resumes ~ emphasis/bolding [except for the title] below is mine ~ Sooz

House Republicans dial back on promises
CNN's Dana Bash and Deirdre Walsh
January 5th, 2011
03:28 PM ET

Washington (CNN) – Even before House Republicans took control of the chamber Wednesday, there were at least three areas where they appear to be backtracking on promises made: Cutting $100 billion in the first year, allowing opportunities for the minority party to offer amendments on bills, and making public attendance records for committee hearings.

The Republicans ran for office in 2010 on a platform they titled "The Pledge to America," which states they would reduce government spending to 2008 "pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels" and cut "at least $100 billion in the first year alone."

House GOP aides are now backing off that $100 billion figure. They insist they will still cut spending back to 2008 levels, but it won't add up to $100 billion. They insist the reason is because they made the $100 billion calculation based on the budget that President Obama offered, and that budget was never enacted. Therefore, the government is currently running on lower, 2009 spending levels and that will make the dollar figure of the GOP cuts smaller.

Republican aides confirm the "back of the envelope" number they will now use is about HALF the original estimate - $50-60 billion in cuts.

"House Republicans remain committed to fulfilling their Pledge; this has not changed," said Conor Sweeney, spokesman for the House Budget Committee.

"House Republicans will continue to work to reduce spending for the final six months of this fiscal year – bringing non-security discretionary spending back to pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels – yielding taxpayers significant savings and starting a new era of cost cutting in Washington," he said.

Being generous to those in the minority was always an objective of the new majority, as articulated by the incoming GOP Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy back before the election:

"Bills won't be written in the back of the room, where the bills have to be laid out for 72 hours, where bills actually have an open rule, where people can bring amendments up on the floor, which any freshman congressman that's sitting there today has never even seen that happen under the rule of Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats," McCarthy said on CNN "State of the Union" on October 10, 2010.

BUT – the health care repeal legislation, the first major bill that will move through Congress, will be a closed rule – meaning no one will be able to offer an amendment.

When asked about the this contradiction Tuesday night, Boehner said, "it's not like we haven't litigated this for years."

And, finally, the initial rules package that House Republicans will pass Wednesday had a provision to make committee attendance public. But the House GOP conference voted last night to strip that out (a move by Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas). The goal had been transparency – who is at these hearings? But making that public will no longer be a requirement.

The reason? Some GOP lawmakers say they were concerned about getting slammed for missing hearings when they may have extenuating circumstances, like a death in the family.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... ore-141930



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/06/11 4:26 am • # 4 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
For those of us keeping track,  the broken promise count rises to 6 on 'opening day' ~ fast work, no? ~ Sooz

QUITE A START.... The new House Republican majority isn't quite one-day old, but commitments they made before the midterm elections are already falling by the wayside.

Quote:

Even before House Republicans took control of the chamber Wednesday, there were at least three areas where they appear to be backtracking on promises made: Cutting $100 billion in the first year, allowing opportunities for the minority party to offer amendments on bills, and making public attendance records for committee hearings.

Perhaps the "Pledge to America" included fine-print disclaimers?

Some of these broken promises are bigger than others. I suspect, for example, that the party's Tea Party base will be none too pleased that Republicans' vow to cut "at least $100 billion in the first year alone" was scrapped before the Speaker's gavel even reached John Boehner's hands. Similarly, the GOP insisted for two years that the minority had to be able to offer amendments to legislation, a vow Boehner repeated during his speech yesterday. A couple of hours later, though, that promise was broken, too.

The decision to scrap attendance records for committee hearings is obviously less significant, but when added to the list, helps paint a picture of broken promises that couldn't even survive the first week of the congressional session.

Indeed, CNN pointed to these three departures from Republicans' stated principles, but there are other examples. The GOP's own rules call for all legislation to go through the regular committee process, as part of a commitment to transparency and due diligence, but when it comes to repealing health care -- the first major task of the new majority -- this rule is being broken, too.

For that matter, Republicans promised constitutional citations for every bill, but their initial legislative efforts have no such language.

Indeed, though it wasn't put in writing, the GOP also vowed to reject legislation that increases the deficit -- and their very first initiative would add over $100 billion to the deficit over the next decade.

At a certain level, it's easy to sympathize with politicians who made pre-election promises they didn't think through at the time. For example, if he had it to do over again, I suspect President Obama wouldn't have vowed to hold health care policy negotiations on C-SPAN, a promise that never really made sense, and caused a fair amount of heartburn a year ago.

But given the number of broken GOP promises, and the speed with which Republicans have ignored elements of their own "Pledge," the new House majority should be aware of a few realities: (1) making promises without forethought is never wise; (2) governing is a whole lot more difficult than taking cheap shots from the minority bleachers.

—Steve Benen 8:00 AM January 6, 2011

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archiv ... 027404.php


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.