Truly, deeply, unrepentantly PATHETIC ~ they're likely afraid of their own shadows, too ~ ~ Sooz

Right-Wing Freak-Out: Children's Movies Pushing Liberal Agenda

ROFL

What can you do.
They're incapable of reporting the news accurately so they make it up on the fly.

They'll do that until they can prove that the fly is a communist homosexual socialist liberal maggot in disguise.

Hmmmmm....I never knew there really was a Cruella DeVille fan club. 

Nothing really new about this sort of hysteria. If these people didn't have their minds in the gutters or weren't looking for crap, they wouldn't find it.
The paranoids are coming, the paranoids are coming!

There are several conspiracy theories about Disney having sexual innuendo or references hidden in some of their animated movies, including The Lion King, The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, and Disney's original home video releases of The Rescuers.

In 1995, a pro-life lobby group, American Life League (ALL), alleged that several Disney films, including The Lion King, The Little Mermaid, and Aladdin contained subliminal messages and sexual imagery.^{[11][/sup][12][/sup] The Lion King allegation was later denied by Tom Sito, a Disney animator and a writer for the film, who claimed that the letters written in the dust cloud actually spelled the initials "S.F.X", meaning 'special effects'; instead, it was interpreted by people who saw the dust message as the word "SEX". It was intended to be an easter egg signature from the animation department, and that the controversy that followed was entirely unintentional.[13][/sup]}

In Aladdin, protests were raised regarding the scene when Aladdin is attacked by the tiger Rajah on the palace balcony. Aladdin quietly says "Come on... good kitty, take off and go..." and the word "kitty" is overlapped by another, unidentifiable sound, most probably Rajah's snarl. Some people reported hearing "Good teenagers, take off your clothes,"^{[14][/sup] which they considered a subliminal reference to sexual promiscuity. Because of the controversy, Disney replaced the phrase with "Down, kitty" on the DVD release.[15][/sup]}

In Who Framed Roger Rabbit a scene drew attention to viewers when Jessica Rabbit revealed what was under her dress in which nothing was drawn. This scene wasn't noticed until 1994 during the film's laserdisc release. This discovery caught the attention of major news media.^[16][/sup]

In The Little Mermaid, King Triton lives in a castle of gold, along with his daughters. The castle is displayed in the artwork for the cover for the Classics VHS cassette when the film was first released on home video in 1990. Close examination of the cover artwork, as well as the poster for the film, shows an oddly shaped structure on the castle, closely resembling a penis. Disney and the cover designer insist it was an accident, resulting from a late night rush job to finish the cover artwork. The questionable object does not appear on the cover of the second releasing of the movie. There was also a widespread rumour in the early to mid-1990s that a clergyman is seen with an erection during a wedding scene, specifically the scene in which a brainwashed Prince Eric is about to marry Ursula the sea witch in disguise.<sup>[17][/sup][18][/sup][19][/sup] The clergyman is a short man, dressed in Bishop's clothing, and a small bulge is slightly noticeable in a few of the frames that are actually later shown to be the stubby-legged man's knees, but the image is small and is very difficult to distinguish. Because of the controversy, this scene was later altered in the film's 2006 Platinum Edition DVD release so that the clergyman is standing on a small platform box and that his knee is no longer visible underneath his robes. The combined incidents led an Arkansas woman to file suit against The Walt Disney Company in 1995, though she dropped the suit two months later.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w..._The_Walt_Disney_Company

The investigation of Hollywood radicals by the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1947 and 1951 was really a continuation of pressure exerted on the industry in the late 1930s and early 1940s by the Dies Committee on Un-American Activities.  The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) charged that Communists had established a significant base in the dominant medium of mass culture (movies & Tv).  Communists were said to be placing subversive messages into films and Tv, and discriminating against unsympathetic colleagues.

http://www.unexplainable....blish/article_9125.shtml

Play the DVDs  backwards, you conservative twits. That's where the real messages are.</sup>

yes, it is a fucking muppet movie. so grow up, you dumb sob. jeez.

Why are righties watching kiddie movies?
Might say something about their intellectual development.

dude.  i don't like cinderella movies.  you know?  damsel in distress stuff.  women can take care of themselves.  they don't need men to do it.  liberals could complain LOUDLY about stuff like that.  but do we?

NO!  instead we are put on the defensive by THIS idiocy.

There's no such thing as bad publicity. Sales on those cartoons probably got a spike when that story was published.