It is currently 05/20/24 2:12 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/08/11 9:44 am • # 1 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188

A controversial method of drilling for oil and natural gas appears to be the cause of groundwater pollution in a central Wyoming town, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday in its first statement implicating what proponents see as the next great energy boom.

The EPA last month said it had found compounds associated with chemicals used in the drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in the groundwater beneath Pavillion. Many residents say their well water has reeked of chemicals since the drilling began there and first complained to the EPA in 2008.

But until Thursday, the EPA said it could not speculate on where the contaminants came from.

In the draft report (.pdf) released Thursday, the EPA said that "the explanation best fitting the data ... is that constituents associated with hydraulic fracturing have been released into the Wind River drinking water aquifer."

Health officials had earlier advised residents not to drink their water after the EPA said it had found benzene and other hydrocarbons in wells it tested.

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/08/9302971-energy-fracking-boom-tainted-by-epa-finding-contaminants-in-drinking-water



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/08/11 10:08 am • # 2 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Frack, baby, frack.


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/08/11 10:49 am • # 3 
Well... it'll be interesting to see how the republicans spin this bit of news. Up here, our con job government has now taken to calling the tar sands "ethical oil".


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/08/11 11:26 am • # 4 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
even when it results in toxic lakes?


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/08/11 11:30 am • # 5 
What's a lake? It's just a puddle of water. Now Venezuelan oil... now that's "unethical oil".

Make no mistake mac... the con job party up here has propaganda down to a fine art. It's actually impressive in a social studies sort of way.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/08/11 11:31 am • # 6 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
macroscopic wrote:
even when it results in toxic lakes?
Of course, according to the Harpercrytes.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/08/11 12:33 pm • # 7 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
Sidartha wrote:
What's a lake? It's just a puddle of water. Now Venezuelan oil... now that's "unethical oil".

Make no mistake mac... the con job party up here has propaganda down to a fine art. It's actually impressive in a social studies sort of way.

if you mean in a "would make Goebbles blush" kind of way, i have seen it, sid.  i have seen it......


Last edited by macroscopic on 12/08/11 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
PostPosted: 12/08/11 12:48 pm • # 8 
That pretty much sums it up.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/08/11 1:09 pm • # 9 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/22/09
Posts: 9530
The Repbulicans want to solve the problem by getting rid of the EPA. 


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/08/11 1:49 pm • # 10 
or... The Environmental Protection Agency becomes the Pollution Approval Agency.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.