It is currently 05/20/24 12:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 9 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/09/11 4:00 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
My kidlets at school have more common sense and simple human decency than the House GOP/TPers ~ Image ~ Sooz

December 09, 2011 8:00 AM
‘It's going to be pointless'
By Steve Benen

The way the fight over the payroll tax break is going, lawmakers, their aides, White House staffers, and reporters should probably start revisiting their holiday travel plans. At this point, there are really only two points of agreement: (1) policymakers need to succeed by the end of the month; and (2) they're nowhere close to an agreement.

Senate Republicans have now voted down four tax-cut bills in two weeks. In the House, matters are arguably worse.

Quote:

Pivoting to challenge President Obama and Senate Democrats, House Republicans said Thursday that they would forge ahead with a payroll tax holiday bill that includes an oil pipeline opposed by the president and that looks to changes in social programs to pay for the tax cut and added unemployment benefits.

In a sharp answer to several failed bills produced by Senate Democrats that would cut an employee's share of the payroll tax and impose a new surcharge on income over $1 million, the House Republican bill would pay for the extension through a mix of changes to entitlement programs and a pay freeze for federal workers.

House GOP lawmakers are so against extending a middle-class tax cut, they're insisting on all kinds of goodies for themselves — adding that if their rewards are taken away, they'll kill the overall proposal, no matter the consequences for the nation's economy.

Indeed, the ransom note is starting to look like a spoiled kid's list for Santa: Republicans want the Keystone XL pipeline and weaker toxic-air safeguards and a ban on future EPA standards on toxic-air pollutants and a premium increase for wealthier Medicare beneficiaries and a federal employees pay freeze and a reduction in the federal workforce and a sharp reduction in the maximum duration of jobless benefits.

And if they don't get all of this, 160 million Americans will have less money in their paychecks starting on Jan. 1.

Could this House bill pass the Senate and earn President Obama's signature? Of course not. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), literally the only Republican on Capitol Hill who's been reasonable on this issue, said yesterday, “It's going to be pointless if the House sends over bills that the Senate cannot or will not pass.â€



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/09/11 4:27 am • # 2 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Truly amazing and very discouraging that so few people see/accept the stark truth in the comment I emphasized/bolded below ~ Image ~ Sooz

December 09, 2011 10:20 AM
Failing a put-up-or-shut-up challenge
By Steve Benen

The White House and congressional Democrats want to cut the payroll tax for another year, paying for it with a surtax on millionaires and billionaires. Congressional Republicans, true to form, have balked. Pressed for an explanation, GOP officials invariably say the surtax on the very wealthy would be bad for small businesses.

Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) argued this week that “it's just intuitiveâ€



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/09/11 5:50 am • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
Just curious- how does reducing the number of federal employees help reduce unemployment?
(I get how limiting unemployment benefits reduces unemployment- because when you are not collecting benefits you are not counted among the unemployed, whether you are working or not.)


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/09/11 6:26 am • # 4 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
it doesn't. half a million government employees have been laid off since this crisis began. that is not very stimulating, unless you hate government more than you love GDP growth.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/09/11 8:48 am • # 5 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
If the Republicans hate governement then why are they working in it? ( in my Cindy Loo Who voice)


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/09/11 10:05 am • # 6 
Perhaps because they hate themselves. (in my Sigmund Freud voice)


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/09/11 10:30 am • # 7 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
If the Republicans hate governement then why are they working in it?

Payoffs.


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/09/11 10:57 am • # 8 
The payoffs only assuage their self-loathing. (so says my inner Freud)


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/09/11 1:46 pm • # 9 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
I repeat: my kidlets at school have more common sense and simple human decency than the House GOP/TPers ~ Image ~ Sooz

Party That Won't Tax Millionaires Proposes Slashing Unemployment Benefits In Deal For Middle Class Tax Cut

Republicans, while claiming to support a payroll tax cut extension that will primarily benefit the middle class, have cycled through a list of reasons to oppose proposals from Senate Democrats. The GOP refuses to pay for the cut with a surtax on millionaires, even as the wealthiest Americans' tax rates have fallen to historic lows. Other GOP members have claimed the extension — which would put an extra $1,000 a year in the average American's pocket — would undermine Social Security (it wouldn't).

Now, with some members of the party worried that opposing the extension would cause it to lose its reputation for anti-tax zealotry, House Republicans are attempting to make it look as if they support the extension by proposing an alternative plan full of demands they know Democrats won't accept. One of those demands, the Hill reports, is a drastic reduction in unemployment insurance that lowers a person's maximum time on benefits from 99 weeks to 59 weeks:

Quote:

The Republican proposal is expected to reduce the total number of weeks unemployed workers are eligible for aid by as much as 40 weeks and tighten rules for eligibility.

Such a reduction would significantly reduce the cost of extending federal unemployment benefits, making it easier to secure GOP support for a measure that will also include an extension of a payroll tax cut many conservative Republicans dislike.

Unemployment insurance remains one of the GOP's favorite targets. Republicans have decried the program as a “lifestyleâ€



Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 9 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.