It is currently 05/18/24 11:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 3 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/20/12 6:09 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
This is HUGE and very welcome ~ and while the "social conservatives" are sure to have yet another meltdown over this, the rule in no way forces or coerces anyone to use contraception if they choose not to ~ I'm sure the argument will be it's an extra/unnecessary expense in health care plans ~ but there are plenty of procedures [FAR more expensive than contraception] covered in my own health care that I pay for via my premiums but [thankfully] don't need to use ~ Sooz 

Obama Administration Approves Rule That Guarantees Near-Universal Contraceptive Coverage

Our guest blogger is Jessica Arons, Director of the Women's Health and Rights Program at American Progress.

Today, in a huge victory for women's health, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced that most employers will be required to cover contraception in their health plans, along with other preventive services, with no cost-sharing such as co-pays or deductibles. This means that after years of trying to get birth control covered to the same extent that health plans cover Viagra, our country will finally have nearly universal coverage of contraception.

Opponents of contraception had lobbied hard for a broad exemption that would have allowed any religiously-affiliated employer to opt out of providing such coverage. Fortunately, the Obama administration rejected that push and decided to maintain the narrow religious exemption that it initially proposed. Only houses of worship and other religious nonprofits that primarily employ and serve people of the same faith will be exempt. Employers covered by the rule will have a year to comply.

Twenty-eight states already require employers, including most religiously affiliated institutions, to cover contraception in their health plans. The only change is that now they must cover the full cost.

Family planning results in better health outcomes for women and their children—a woman who has a planned pregnancy is more likely to be in better health when she gets pregnant and more likely to seek prenatal care, and children who are born at least two years apart are healthier. Family planning is also the most effective tool we have in reducing unintended pregnancy and the need for abortion.

An expanded religious exemption would have created an unreasonably large loophole that would have kept these benefits beyond the reach of millions of women. This decision honors the conscience of these women over that of the institutions that employ them and ensures that cost will no longer be a barrier to accessing basic and essential preventive health services.

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/01/20/407994/obama-administration-approves-rule-that-guarantees-near-universal-contraceptive-coverage/



Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/20/12 8:39 am • # 2 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Guess Repubs don't have any investments in comdom manufacturers.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/20/12 8:50 am • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/22/09
Posts: 9530
I don't expect any big push by social conservative spokes groups would gain much traction even within the population they pretend to represent because:

1.  Even social conservatives have recreational sex...on a rather frequent basis if the studies are correct.

2.  Even the real nutbars realize that the more available contraception is, the fewer abortions there will be.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 3 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.