It is currently 11/21/24 2:09 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next   Page 4 of 8   [ 189 posts ]
Author Message
PostPosted: 01/16/13 10:56 am • # 76 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpfLLtPJvxA

Haven't learned how to post vds on this site yet... :o


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 11:32 am • # 77 
kathyk1024 wrote:
mpicky wrote:
Quality magazine are important. In the Clackmas Mall shooting, he had high capacity magazines, cheap ones. And, they acted like cheap ones and failed. That is why he killed so few people.


Good. I don't want anyone to have high quality magazines, except the military or police.

Feinstein's bill wants your gun to come standard with a smaller magazine in the future. I think that's good, too. Smaller magazines seem effective for self defense.

I am not sure why you and monster are anti-legislation against the large magazines. It is going to help in extreme cases but not in the majority. I understand that part. 55 percent of handgun deaths are suicides. I don't think the magazine size is important there either. They only need a bullet or two.




Because I don't think creating new laws is going to do anything to solve the problem. Its the same thing we've been doing in this country for a long time now. We put bandaids on gaping wounds. What happened at Sandy Hook is beyond calling it a tragedy. But NOTHING that has been proposed as far as new regs on guns is going to prevent something like that from happening again. Like mpicky, if someone can come up with something that will work, then I am all for it. But that has yet to happen. The blowback from creating laws is you create a new criminal element and expand the existing ones by giving them another product to peddle. These new laws and orders will do absolutely nothing to prevent these kinds of shootings from happening again.

As for locking people up so they never see daylight again, that is ridiculous and extreme. Which serve no purpose than to drive up the price of banned guns and parts. And then it increases the amount of people we already have incarcerated. Locking someone up that has a magazine that shoots 30 bullets forever? That is the kind of talk that gives the gun lobby what they need to scare the hell out of people. To make them think the govt is coming to take their guns away. Hells Bells, look what the rumors about the 'sweeping' gun control measures have done to the gun market.

Folks, give me something that will REALLY solve the problem or I will be one of the 'from my cold dead hands' folks .


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 11:34 am • # 78 
oskar576 wrote:
The Bill of Sale?


New York just banned them outright. You have 1 year from today to sell them out of state.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 11:41 am • # 79 
If you don't mention the guns are from out of state, and have someone with Arkansas ID sell them for you, you can sell them easily enough without any proof of ownership even....


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 11:55 am • # 80 
Cannalee2 wrote:
If you don't mention the guns are from out of state, and have someone with Arkansas ID sell them for you, you can sell them easily enough without any proof of ownership even....


Yes, I get that. But Oskar's assertion all along has been that what has been legally purchased to this point is safe. It obviously isn't.

Prices of 8 round magazines are going to go through the roof. Why? Because now they HAVE to buy them.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 11:58 am • # 81 
I dont' think it's ridiculous or extreme. If you trade your AR-15 for $100 and an eight-ball, and they kill someone with it, you are complicit and go to jail. Go directly to jail for 10 years. You are worrying about growing the criminal element without punishing the providers. I don't think that guy was a responsible citizen even though he purchased the gun legally. Nor was the soccer mom who wore her glock on her belt to kids' soccer games and then ended up in a murder/suicide with baby daddy.

There isn't going to be a magic bullet solution here. Mental health services do not work if people don't access them. You really think Tim McVeigh or Eric Harris would have availed themselves to Mental Health services. They had anti-social personality disorder, and with that comes a righteous indignation and sense of moral superiority.

What solution do you have, monster, to bandage the wound because to me arming everyone is not a viable solution?


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:08 pm • # 82 
Again I ask: how are these laws going to be enforced?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:11 pm • # 83 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
Cannalee2 wrote:
Again I ask: how are these laws going to be enforced?


in Switzerland they have annual household firearms inspections.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:14 pm • # 84 
Announced ahead of time?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:16 pm • # 85 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Does it matter?


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:22 pm • # 86 
Oh yeah, it matters....!


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:26 pm • # 87 
They aren't going to do that. It's always like the sky is falling. The big, bad government is invading.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:28 pm • # 88 
macroscopic wrote:
Cannalee2 wrote:
Again I ask: how are these laws going to be enforced?


in Switzerland they have annual household firearms inspections.



Where they come and search your home? That isn't against the Constitution, unreasonable search and seizure?

Or, just search of gun owners homes, because that would be unconstitutional as well. You can't search the urine of poor people just because they are on welfare, how can you search the home of a gun owner just because they own a gun?

You wouldn't care if you weren't doing anything wrong. Patriot Act defense right there.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:41 pm • # 89 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
mpicky wrote:
macroscopic wrote:
Cannalee2 wrote:
Again I ask: how are these laws going to be enforced?


in Switzerland they have annual household firearms inspections.



Where they come and search your home? That isn't against the Constitution, unreasonable search and seizure?

it really depends on how they are structured. safety inspections are perfectly legal, for example.

Or, just search of gun owners homes, because that would be unconstitutional as well.

in the case of Switzerland, it is not just a random search.

You can't search the urine of poor people just because they are on welfare, how can you search the home of a gun owner just because they own a gun?

in the case of Switzerland, people are REQUIRED to have firearms, and maintain them. that seems like a logical consequence of the 2nd Amendment to me. how about you?

You wouldn't care if you weren't doing anything wrong. Patriot Act defense right there.


meh. nobody seems to give a shit about the PATRIOT Act. i have been squealing about it every day since it passed, and yet, it keeps getting renewed and even strengthened. Bedtime For Democracy happened in 2001, but nobody did SHIT about it, pickey- so forgive me if i don't give much attention to anyone's very late sense of outrage over our lost rights.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:42 pm • # 90 
I wish I had the solution. And to be quite honest, I don't think there is a solution. It's like trying to put the horses back in the barn after they've been on the run for a hundred years. There are over 300 million weapons out there now. Without confiscating every one of them, you will not prevent another Sandy Hook from happening. You will not prevent another mall or theater shooting. I cried when I heard about the SH shooting. I have a son that will be 8 years old, in 10 days and I couldn't imagine what those parents that lost their kids went through. But nothing that I have seen proposed so far will stop it from happening again. NOTHING. Doing 'something' for the sake of saying you did something is foolish, imo.


I know this is a bit political but Ima say it anyway. There should have been a lot more talking and working before we came up with what we came up with. SH took place less than a month ago and we already have EO's and new laws being proposed. How long has health care been in the toilet, unemployment been high, welfare and public assistance dependency gone through the roof, but in less than a month, we can deal with a gun issue?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:45 pm • # 91 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
the quantity of weapons is immaterial. there is no correlation between the number of weapons and the murder rate. no, it is something else. and i think we should have a national debate about what that something else is, and then we should do something about it, and try to save 60 lives a day.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:47 pm • # 92 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
kathyk1024 wrote:
They aren't going to do that. It's always like the sky is falling. The big, bad government is invading.


my business gets invaded all of the time. it is not a violation of my privacy rights. but, just to be clear, there is no right to privacy in the constitution. sorry. there just isn't.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:52 pm • # 93 
There isn't a solution for the short term. I agree with you, monster. If an Eric Harris, Tim McVeigh, Jared Lautner, Adam Lanza wants to slaughter people they are going to be able to. They are all willing to die for their cause so fear of punishment isn't going to impede anything ether.

I think pushing back on the upping of the gun ante is a good idea. I don't think responsible gun owners need to mow down a mall without reloading. I really don't. Maybe the steps we make now to stop the escalation will do some good in the future, because you have to start somewhere at sometime.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:54 pm • # 94 
macroscopic wrote:
the quantity of weapons is immaterial. there is no correlation between the number of weapons and the murder rate. no, it is something else. and i think we should have a national debate about what that something else is, and then we should do something about it, and try to save 60 lives a day.



Lord I hope you aren't being facetious!!!!

Because I agree!


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 12:55 pm • # 95 
macroscopic wrote:
kathyk1024 wrote:
They aren't going to do that. It's always like the sky is falling. The big, bad government is invading.


my business gets invaded all of the time. it is not a violation of my privacy rights. but, just to be clear, there is no right to privacy in the constitution. sorry. there just isn't.


What are you arguing? Do you really think the government is going to go door to door to do gun inspections? The nation is paranoid enough on this issue without putting stuff like that out there.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 01/16/13 1:23 pm • # 96 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188
So, because there's no "magic bullet" to fix it all (yeah, I went there-lol) we should do absolutely nothing, Monster?

As for locking people up so they never see daylight again, that is ridiculous and extreme.

I'm friggin' SICK AND TIRED of having to be reasonable and polite and thoughtful while the gun nuts get to scream about every imagined boogeyman they can come up with. If they can toss shit to see what sticks, so can I. :lol


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 1:28 pm • # 97 
macroscopic wrote:
mpicky wrote:
macroscopic wrote:


Where they come and search your home? That isn't against the Constitution, unreasonable search and seizure?

it really depends on how they are structured. safety inspections are perfectly legal, for example.

Or, just search of gun owners homes, because that would be unconstitutional as well.

in the case of Switzerland, it is not just a random search.

You can't search the urine of poor people just because they are on welfare, how can you search the home of a gun owner just because they own a gun?

in the case of Switzerland, people are REQUIRED to have firearms, and maintain them. that seems like a logical consequence of the 2nd Amendment to me. how about you?

You wouldn't care if you weren't doing anything wrong. Patriot Act defense right there.


meh. nobody seems to give a shit about the PATRIOT Act. i have been squealing about it every day since it passed, and yet, it keeps getting renewed and even strengthened. Bedtime For Democracy happened in 2001, but nobody did SHIT about it, pickey- so forgive me if i don't give much attention to anyone's very late sense of outrage over our lost rights.


I have been right there with you bitching about the Patriot Act and being against drug tests for welfare. In fact I have been VERY vocal about both.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 1:30 pm • # 98 
macroscopic wrote:
kathyk1024 wrote:
They aren't going to do that. It's always like the sky is falling. The big, bad government is invading.


my business gets invaded all of the time. it is not a violation of my privacy rights. but, just to be clear, there is no right to privacy in the constitution. sorry. there just isn't.


Roe V Wade determined it was implied.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 1:32 pm • # 99 
macroscopic wrote:
the quantity of weapons is immaterial. there is no correlation between the number of weapons and the murder rate. no, it is something else. and i think we should have a national debate about what that something else is, and then we should do something about it, and try to save 60 lives a day.


I am more than willing to say guns are a part of the problem, but I think it goes much deeper.


Top
  
PostPosted: 01/16/13 1:34 pm • # 100 
Chaos333 wrote:
So, because there's no "magic bullet" to fix it all (yeah, I went there-lol) we should do absolutely nothing, Monster?

As for locking people up so they never see daylight again, that is ridiculous and extreme.

I'm friggin' SICK AND TIRED of having to be reasonable and polite and thoughtful while the gun nuts get to scream about every imagined boogeyman they can come up with. If they can toss shit to see what sticks, so can I. :lol



In MY experience, both sides have been equally screaming and terribly rude and unhelpful to the conversation.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next   Page 4 of 8   [ 189 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.