It is currently 09/28/24 4:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 08/06/13 7:55 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR ~ :angry :angry :angry ~ there are "live links" to more/corroborating info in the original ~ Sooz

Thursday, Aug 1, 2013 04:22 PM CDT
NRA asks SCOTUS to strike down gun limits for minors
The gun lobby is challenging a law that bans the sale of handguns to those between 18 and 21.
By Jillian Rayfield

The National Rifle Association is asking the Supreme Court to overturn a federal law that prevents federally licensed gun owners from selling handguns to people over 18 and under 21.

In a court filing, the NRA and two 19-year olds ask the court to strike down the 1968 law, which a three-judge panel for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld last year.

The law prevents licensed gun dealers from selling handguns, shotguns and rifles to anyone under 18, and further prevents the sale of handguns and ammo to anyone under 21. It does not prevent anyone between 18 and 21 from obtaining a gun through other channels, like private sales, and it does not stop them from purchasing a rifle or shotgun from a federally licensed dealer. The NRA is strictly challenging the provision of the law that applies to the purchase of handguns from licensed dealers for anyone over the age of 18 and under the age of 21.

Writing on behalf of the 5th Circuit panel, Judge Edward Prado argued that Congress was correct when it “restricted the ability of minors under 21 to purchase handguns because Congress found that they tend to be relatively immature and that denying them easy access to handguns would deter violent crime.” He added that Congress “could have sought to prohibit all persons under 21 from possessing handguns — or all guns, for that matter. But Congress deliberately adopted a calibrated, compromise approach.”

The NRA’s petition was filed in April, after eight of the 15 judges on the 5th Circuit voted against rehearing the case en banc. The filing asks the court to consider “Whether a nationwide, class-based, categorical ban on meaningful access to the quintessential means to exercise the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense can be reconciled with the Second Amendment, the equal protection guarantee, and this Court’s precedents.”

“The Framers’ decision to enshrine the Second Amendment and this Court’s decisions recognizing that the right it secures is both individual and fundamental are decisions with consequences,” the filing continues. “One obvious consequence is that individuals above the legal age of majority cannot be denied any meaningful ability to purchase the quintessential means for exercising the core individual right.”

From Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSBlog:

Quote:
Since the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, establishing a personal Second Amendment right to have a gun for self-defense, and its 2010 decision in McDonald v. Chicago, extending that right all across the country at the state and local level, the Court has not granted review of any new gun control case. In fact, it has turned down at least six such challenges by gun rights advocates to federal or state restrictions.

http://www.salon.com/2013/08/01/nra_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_gun_limits_for_minors/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/05/13 9:04 am • # 2 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ~ :angry ~ Sooz

Twenty-Two Attorneys General Back NRA’s Lawsuit Seeking To Allow Teenagers To Buy Handguns
By Ian Millhiser on September 5, 2013 at 9:00 am

Last April, one of the most conservative federal appeals courts in the country upheld a federal ban on handgun sales to persons under age 21 — rejecting the National Rifle Association’s claim that the judiciary should lower this age to 18. Two George W. Bush appointees joined the unanimous panel opinion, although several of the court’s most conservative members made a failed bid to reverse their decision. Now, however, twenty-two state attorneys general have taken up the NRA’s cause by filing a brief backing their case in the Supreme Court. Twenty of these twenty-two officials are Republicans.

Although the Roberts Court has been quite friendly to the NRA in the past, there is at least some hope for gun safety advocates who do not want to see America’s gun laws become even looser. The Fifth Circuit is a deeply conservative court. If the NRA could not win there, then they could face an uphill climb even in this very conservative Supreme Court.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/09/05/2573951/attorneys-general-nras-lawsuit-seeking-allow-teenagers-buy-handguns/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/05/13 9:25 am • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/22/09
Posts: 9530
If the kids are allowed to buy guns privately or at gun shows, it doesn't make much sense to prevent gun shops from selling them.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/05/13 11:17 am • # 4 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 07/03/10
Posts: 1851
Just when I think things can't get more insane in this country, they do. If I had the money, I'd move to another country.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.