It is currently 06/17/24 12:21 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 12 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/25/13 2:44 pm • # 1 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
By Ron Shaich, Special to CNN
updated 12:04 PM EDT, Wed September 25, 2013

(CNN) -- I thought I knew a thing or two about hunger. I've met thousands of people who struggle to feed themselves and their families, visited dozens of soup kitchens, food pantries, homeless shelters and food banks, and worked closely with nonprofit organizations in trying to find new ways to end hunger.

I really thought I understood the scope of the problem.

But let me tell you something -- I had no clue. My SNAP Challenge last week taught me that merely observing someone else's plight does not hold a candle to consciously altering your habits to better understand what it might be like to live someone else's life.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program was formerly called the food stamp program. In the SNAP challenge, you live on a food and beverage budget of $4.50 a day, the average amount a recipient of food stamps gets in benefits.

I was hungry last week -- laser-focused on how much food was left in the fridge and how many dollars were left in my wallet. I was scared about eating portions that were too big, and wasn't sure what to do if my food ran out. I canceled two scheduled dinners, knowing they were way beyond my budget.

But I was doing this challenge on my own. Eighty percent of households that have problems putting food on the table include the most vulnerable -- children, the elderly and the disabled. Most people in the SNAP program would have considered my challenge as a "household of one" to be a luxury.

My approach to grocery shopping was to try to stay full. That meant carbohydrates. In retrospect, it was a poor choice. I ended up with a diet largely based around pasta, lentils, chickpeas and cereal. While it wasn't a ton of food, I could mix and match for various meals and find myself not quite full -- but enough to get by. Breakfast and snacks were Toasted Oats. Lunch and dinner varied between chickpea, jalapeno and tomato soup, lentil casserole and pasta with tomato sauce and garlic. Fresh fruit, vegetables and yogurt were too expensive.

I also gave up coffee because it didn't fit within the budget. I only drank water. My drastic change in diet made me listless and grumpy.

But the seven days of this challenge happened in a vacuum. It was really just an imitation of a very real problem facing millions of Americans -- it wasn't my real life. It was over in a week. No other pressures weighed on my shoulders the way they do on those of people who use food stamps. I wasn't worrying about my car breaking down or not being able to pay for gas or having my electricity turned off or finding work or paying an unforeseen medical bill.

All I had to worry about was my food, and that was challenging enough.

One in six people in this country, or roughly 48 million Americans, face this reality. At the same time, they confront other obstacles and manage to deal with more pressing challenges every day. The statistics are alarming. However, it wasn't until I participated in the challenge and heard stories from the hundreds of people who responded to my blog posts that I really understood what a life of food insecurity means.

One person wrote me, "It's not about a weeklong 'challenge.' It's about months. It's about deciding whether to eat or buy heart medicine or diabetic drugs. ... It's about knowing that this week is followed by another and another and another. It's not about (whether or not food is) boring. It's about living."

I believed at first that by taking the challenge to eat on $4.50 a day diet, I could raise awareness about hunger. What has become clear is that those who are "food insecure" -- or even those living close to that edge -- are all too aware of their circumstances.

Helping the hungry is not a zero sum game. We can discuss policy, and undoubtedly each of us will land on one side or the other of the political debate.

Unfortunately, the debate we often hear in Washington leads to thinking that the issue can be seen in black or white, right or wrong, good or bad.

We all know there are people who abuse the system. I have no doubt that there are some people who accept SNAP benefits when they either don't need the assistance or may not use them appropriately. But SNAP is really an efficient program. There are small problems with the system -- but there always are in large, complex systems.

Tens of millions of people, most of whom are elderly or have children, rely on this safety net to help them cope with very difficult situations beyond their control. And we can all acknowledge our shared responsibility to help these fellow citizens survive and ultimately create productive lives of dignity.

Throughout my SNAP Challenge, I kept returning to the same questions: What kind of society do we want to live in? Do we want to live in a country that turns a cold shoulder to the problem of hunger, or one in which we work together to face it head on?

We, in corporate America, must be part of the solution. At Panera, we have tried to stretch ourselves to think of how to address hunger in new ways and challenge others to do the same. We have developed five nonprofit "Panera Cares" community cafes with no set prices and have donated hundreds of millions of dollars in products to food banks. Our view is that unless we at Panera take care of the world that we live in, there won't be any society left to support us.

If the past week has taught me anything, it's that hunger is not a problem of "them," it's a problem of "us." Hunger exists in every community, in every county, in every state. Simply put, this is our problem to solve, and it's time to do so.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/25/opinion/s ... index.html?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/25/13 3:39 pm • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/05/10
Posts: 14091
Wasn't there some Republican dipshit who lived on food stamps and said it was a breeze?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/25/13 4:08 pm • # 3 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Yes, roseanne ~ but he didn't make it for the full week ~ said he was "tired of eating crap" ~ :ey

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/25/13 4:16 pm • # 4 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Glad to read this ~ I will now make a point of supporting Panera wherever/whenever I can ~ our school motto is from Aristotle: "Do the right thing, in the right way, for the right reason" ~ and Panera is obviously living/teaching that as well ~ so is Jon Bon Jovi ~ he has a café in [I think] New Jersey that has a "pay what you can" attitude - no one is ever turned away for lack of $$$, and those who can overpay [by choice] to help ~ good people find a way to share their goodness ~

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/25/13 5:18 pm • # 5 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
sooz06 wrote:
Yes, roseanne ~ but he didn't make it for the full week ~ said he was "tired of eating crap" ~ :ey

Sooz


And I think he was eating Fruit Loops and Doritos, and said it was "no problem", until it was.


Top
  
PostPosted: 09/25/13 5:59 pm • # 6 
Jon Bon Jovi's Soul Kitchen is in Red Bank, NJ (home of Count Basie and Kevin Smith),

Doritos are pretty expensive actually. I don't think you can do them on $4.50 a day.

When I interned down at Providence House (which was a partial care facility for the long-term mentally ill) I know they came for the food. They'd sit through the various groups and participate as much as they had to in order to retain their status. We served breakfast and lunch and these people were hungry and needed to eat.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/26/13 5:52 am • # 7 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/05/10
Posts: 14091
kathyk1024 wrote:
Jon Bon Jovi's Soul Kitchen is in Red Bank, NJ (home of Count Basie and Kevin Smith),

Doritos are pretty expensive actually. I don't think you can do them on $4.50 a day.

When I interned down at Providence House (which was a partial care facility for the long-term mentally ill) I know they came for the food. They'd sit through the various groups and participate as much as they had to in order to retain their status. We served breakfast and lunch and these people were hungry and needed to eat.



Interesting. Reminds me of a song "Mogen David" or "The Midnight Choir" (One of my all time fave songs!). Here are the first few lyrics:

The doors to the mission open at seven
And the soup will be ready about nine
Right now it's six-thirty, they're ragged and dirty
They're standin' and sittin' and layin' in line

First they'll do a little singin', then hear a little preachin'
And get saved for the 3rd time this week
A bowl of soup later and a pat on the shoulder
And by midnight, they're back on the street


Read more: Larry Gatlin & The Gatlin Brothers - Midnight Choir (Mogen David) Lyrics | MetroLyrics


Top
  
PostPosted: 09/26/13 8:46 am • # 8 
Providence House is a mental health facility. Most of the long term patients they could tell you more about the mental health group content than the facilitators. One guy's been going since 1984.

No preaching and no saving. Basically they know what is is.

The positive to this is they get food and their meds.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/26/13 10:43 am • # 9 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 02/09/09
Posts: 4713
Interesting. Thanks for posting, Oskar.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/26/13 11:27 am • # 10 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
What stood out for me is his realisation that he was experiencing only half the problem. Though he experienced hunger he didn't have to decide between buying food and buying insulin, for example.


Top
  
PostPosted: 09/26/13 12:42 pm • # 11 
oskar576 wrote:
What stood out for me is his realisation that he was experiencing only half the problem. Though he experienced hunger he didn't have to decide between buying food and buying insulin, for example.


Can't buy insulin with your food stamps.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 09/26/13 12:45 pm • # 12 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
kathyk1024 wrote:
oskar576 wrote:
What stood out for me is his realisation that he was experiencing only half the problem. Though he experienced hunger he didn't have to decide between buying food and buying insulin, for example.


Can't buy insulin with your food stamps.


And food stamps are insufficient so now one would have to spend money to supplement the "food stamp diet"... or go hungry, which is what Mr. Shaich realised.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 12 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.