It is currently 05/18/24 3:03 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 6 posts ]
Author Message
PostPosted: 10/29/13 10:15 am • # 1 
I always knew this. I also know that if I am dressing for lunch with a female friend I have to take care with hair and makeup, and if I am going with Jeff and his buddies they get what they get.


Yes, men really do ogle women's bodies

Sharon Jayson, USA TODAY 12:03 a.m. EDT October 29, 2013



Eye-tracking technology confirms that breasts, waists and hips get longer looks.


The eyes don't lie: Men really do look at women's bodies more than their faces, according to a new study that used eye-tracking technology to prove what many women have long observed.

But it's not just men who do it -- the study found that women look at other women's bodies, too.

"We live in a culture in which we constantly see women objectified in interactions on television and in the media. When you turn your own lens on everyday, ordinary women, we focus on those parts, too," says lead author and social psychologist Sarah Gervais of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

"Until now, we didn't have evidence people were actually doing that to women's bodies," she says. "We have women's self-reports, but this is some of the first work to document that people actually engage in this."

The participants – 29 women and 36 men – were outfitted with the eye-tracking system, which measures in milliseconds how long the eyes are fixed on certain spots. Their gazes reacted to photographs of the same 10 women, each with three different digitally manipulated body shapes – curvaceous, much less curvaceous and in-between. (Only women's bodies were viewed by study participants.) Both sexes fixed their gaze more on women's chests and waists and less on faces. Those bodies with larger breasts, narrower waists and bigger hips often prompted longer looks.

The explanation may be partly evolutionary, Gervais says, since men may be drawn to more shapely women for childbearing -- while women may be checking out their competition, she suggests.

And the study, published today in the journal Sex Roles, also finds that even when men are told to focus more on evaluating a woman's expressions and personality, women with more curves get more positive personality ratings.

Researcher Kun Guo, who also uses eye tracking in his studies at the University of Lincoln in the United Kingdom, says the technology provides "more objective measurements" than do questionnaires, which are subjective.

"The beauty of eye movements is that it is more difficult to inhibit," he says.

Jamie Lynn Goldenberg, an associate professor of psychology at the University of South Florida in Tampa, says there's been a lot of research on self-objectification, but only recently has attention turned to perceptions by others. She hasn't used eye-tracking in her studies but says it's "an interesting way" to look at objectification, which amounts to viewing women as objects.

"We have new methodologies for studying these things -- getting into the eyes of the perceiver," she says. "It doesn't explain why they're looking, but they're looking longer."


Top
  
PostPosted: 10/29/13 7:50 pm • # 2 
I gave an assignment on the objectification of women in music videos and in the media in general. I was a little surprised that many students said if you didn't like the sexualized videos, don't watch them. I commented on one male student's paper that males could actually believe Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines lyric "I know you want it", because we all are fans of being given something that tears our ass in two.

The major problem being that society is normalizing the concept of woman as object. Not woman as person. Go Hillary. It's time.


Last edited by kathyk1024 on 10/29/13 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/29/13 7:59 pm • # 3 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
I easily admit that if/when I notice someone who is gorgeous [male OR female] or has a great body [male OR female], I will generally comment on s/he to whomever I'm with ~ does that qualify as "objectifying"?

Sooz


Top
  
PostPosted: 10/29/13 8:21 pm • # 4 
Not really.

People aren't blind. They are going to notice if someone is attractive.

It has a whole lot to do with women being objects and not subjects.

This article is really good.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/joy-goh ... 03251.html


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/29/13 8:38 pm • # 5 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
It's been a verrrrry long day for me ~ so I saved the link to read the article in the morning ~

Sooz


Top
  
PostPosted: 10/29/13 8:40 pm • # 6 
I'm tired too and I have an 8AM class!!!! ACK!!


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 6 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.