Cannalee2 wrote:
I don't have law firm experience have a little law enforcement background and to go immediately to trial in this case without grand jury investigation I think would have ended up like a carnival. I do agree McCullough should have stepped but I think the grand jury was necessary. I also think most police officers would agree with me. Brown went for the gun once I would not have given him a second chance
Brown was warned and didn't heed the warning
In such a case there is no such thing as shooting to " wound" but you shoot to hit--if it's a kill shot well that happens when you charge an officer who has his weapon drawn. And I think every cop in America agrees with me.
Cannalee, I support the grand jury process ~ but I believe McCullough tainted this grand jury from the get-go ~
And I agree with oskar's "doubt" in his above post ~ your comment "... no such thing as shooting to " wound" but you shoot to hit--if it's a kill shot well that happens ..." is chilling in the extreme to me ~ I reject the "well that happens" mindset ~ my very long-term significant other was a cop/detective ~ he thought of himself and acted as a "peace officer", a concept that seems to have been lost in the last several years ~
Sooz