It is currently 04/11/25 3:25 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 11 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/08/14 9:26 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Personally, I still have a problem understanding death ~ especially in young people ~ I generally support "medical euthanasia", but I canNOT imagine living with knowing exactly when I will die ~ this is a very brave and conscientious young woman ~ Sooz

29-year-old California woman will end her life on Nov. 1, and she wants you to know why
Arturo Garcia | 07 Oct 2014

A 29-year-old terminally-ill California woman who plans to die on Nov. 1 is calling for the expansion of medical euthanasia laws to help people in her situation, People Magazine reported.

“I plan to be surrounded by my immediate family, which is my husband and my mother and my step-father and my best friend, who is also a physician,” Brittany Maynard said in a video posted by the advocacy group Compassion & Choices. “I will die upstairs, in my bedroom that I share with my husband, with my mother and my husband by my side and pass peacefully with some music that I like in the background.”

Earlier this year, Maynard was diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme, an aggressive strain of brain cancer and given months to live. In keeping with her wishes, she and her husband moved to Oregon, one of five states that allows patients dealing with untreatable diseases to take lethal prescriptions. She chose Nov. 1 as her death date, she said, because it is two days after her husband’s birthday.

Oregon’s law, which passed in 1997, requires that patients’ terminal diagnoses be confirmed by two physicians and that they make two requests 15 days apart. Of the 1,173 patients who have received prescriptions under the law, 752 have used the medication.

“I believe this choice is ethical, and what makes it ethical is it is a choice,” Maynard told People. “The patient can change their mind right up to the last minute. I feel very protected here in Oregon.”

Maynard also said she would work with Compassion & Choices on a video that would be played for lawmakers and voters in California later this month. The group is currently campaigning for expanded euthanasia laws in that state, as well as Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. She said she focused on California because of the “profound” effort it took for her and her family to transition from California to Oregon.

“There’s tons of Americans who don’t have time or the ability or finances, and I don’t think that’s right or fair,” she said.

Watch Maynard talk about her decision to die, as posted online on Monday, below.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/29-year-old-california-woman-will-end-her-life-on-nov-1-and-she-wants-you-to-know-why/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/08/14 2:22 pm • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/05/10
Posts: 14093
I read about this yesterday. May you go in peace, Brittany. :fl


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/08/14 2:29 pm • # 3 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
She's already at peace.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 10:04 am • # 4 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Brittany Maynard is one amazing and strong young woman! ~ I canNOT imagine sifting thru these choices, especially at her age ~ and Mary Elizabeth Williams' sensitive writing lends great context ~ there are "live links" to more/corroborating information in the original ~ Sooz

Thursday, Oct 30, 2014 1:57 PM UTC
Brittany Maynard’s hard choices
How does a person with Stage 4 cancer know when to end life? She doesn't -- and I should know.
Mary Elizabeth Williams

Death – even a death that is planned for – rarely follows an easily predictable path. It is complicated and rife with unforeseen events. And so it is with the impending demise of Brittany Maynard.

In the past few weeks, the terminally ill 29 year-old has become a lightning rod for the right to die movement, thanks to her brave and very public announcement of her decision to end her life on November 1 – a decision she now says she’s revised. Just earlier this month, she shared her story of her fatal diagnosis of Stage 4 glioblastoma multiforme, a deadly brain cancer that offers her the prospect of just a few months of life. In her announcement, she explained how she and her husband moved to Oregon specifically to take advantage of the state’s physician-assisted right to die policies, and said, “I can’t even tell you the amount of relief it provides me to know that I don’t have to die the way that it’s been described to me that my brain tumor would take me on its own…. Cancer is ending my life. I am choosing to end it a little sooner and in a lot less pain and suffering.” Since sharing her news with the world, she’s been living to the fullest, including a “bucket list” trip to the Grand Canyon that she described as “breathtakingly beautiful” even as it was occasionally interrupted by headaches, pain and “my worst seizure thus far.”

But on Wednesday, the day before her husband’s birthday, Maynard announced a revision of her plan. “I still feel good enough and I still have enough joy and I still laugh and smile with my family and friends enough that it doesn’t seem like the right time right now,” she says. “But it will come, because I feel myself getting sicker. It’s happening each week.”

Maynard has this month attracted both intense support and criticism for her choices — and her latest one will likely stir up more of the same. She herself is openly struggling with questions about how she’s proceeding. She says, “The worst thing that could happen to me is that I wait too long because I’m trying to seize each day, but I somehow have my autonomy taken away from me by my disease because of the nature of my cancer.”

This is what you learn when you go through an experience like this. This is what it’s like. It is so changeable, so often shockingly not what one could ever expect, that it’s very hard to know what to do until you do it. It’s a subject I’m no stranger to. Three years ago, I’d already been through serious cancer once when I watched my father-in-law die of it. As I sat with him in hospice the last time, I vowed that I would never want to go through what he had, that – like Brittany Maynard has now done – if it ever came to it I’d go to a state with compassionate right to die laws and exit before the disease debilitated me. Then I was rediagnosed at Stage 4. And in that harrowing period that followed, even when I was throwing up sometimes multiple times a day, I found myself bargaining with fate for more time. Everything I thought I knew about going out somewhat on top paled next to the desire to do anything to just spend another day with my children. You’d be amazed at what you can live with when you’re facing not living at all.

I was very fortunate to get into a lifesaving clinical trial shortly after my diagnosis, and to have a swift remission. But I know that had my cancer progressed as rapidly as it often does, I would have had to regularly measure my quality of life against the reality of the predicted outcome. And the only thing I now know for certain is that nobody on earth can second-guess Brittany Maynard’s choices, because until you are in a position to see your own expiration date coming ever more sharply into focus, until you are facing the pain and debilitation of a difficult end, you just don’t know what you would do. Even when you are in that position, you are making judgment calls, right up to the last moment.

Last month I lost one of my best friends to cancer. Like Maynard, she had been given the news earlier this year that there was nothing more medicine could do for her. But when we sat together on a warm afternoon a few weeks before she passed, she spoke both of the inevitability of her fate and her desire for an improvement in her symptoms. Those things weren’t mutually exclusive. She recognized that her time was finite but she wanted as much time and as much lucid, pain-free time within that diminishing space as she could possibly have. That is a very tough thing to pull off, but in the end she did it with more finesse than any person I have ever known.

That Maynard is able now, with a still clear mind and body, enjoy more precious time with her loved ones, is a gift — not just to her but those who will remember her when she’s gone. There may soon come a time when the pain of living exceeds the joy of it for her, and then the plans will have to be looked at again. But Maynard and her family seem eminently capable of facing those challenges as they arise. We’re all going to die. And to meet death with grace and good humor and surrounded by love, whenever and however it comes, is the best that any of us can wish for.

http://www.salon.com/2014/10/30/brittany_maynards_hard_choices/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 10:07 am • # 5 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Not much else to be said, IMO.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 1:23 pm • # 6 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/05/10
Posts: 14093
I would add one more thing: As long as the option to end one's own suffering is there for the taking, it gives an added dimension to being able to live. If that makes sense. The despair of knowing that untold suffering may be coming without any relief is torture.

That is yet another reason I am for medical euthanasia. It gives hope, as silly as that sounds.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 1:32 pm • # 7 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
roseanne wrote:
I would add one more thing: As long as the option to end one's own suffering is there for the taking, it gives an added dimension to being able to live. If that makes sense. The despair of knowing that untold suffering may be coming without any relief is torture.

That is yet another reason I am for medical euthanasia. It gives hope, as silly as that sounds.


Those pesky words and their usage again.
I'd suggest that "medical euthanasia" differs from "doctor assisted suicide". It might appear to be picky but the implications differ.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 4:07 pm • # 8 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/05/10
Posts: 14093
Yes, oskar. I'm just saying that if there is an option to end ones life, no matter how (or what words are used), then it takes the worry about suffering off the table. That's all. If one is terminal, there are many things to worry about already. Dreading pain and suffering should not be part of that. jmo

My Mother was VERY worried about that. I assured her that I would not let her suffer and that made her happy. She quit worrying. I had control over her pain meds under the guidance of the Hospice program. 'Nuff said. She died very peacefully in my home, with me holding her hand, free of pain. :)


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 5:51 pm • # 9 
Editorialist

Joined: 10/20/15
Posts: 4032
That's admirable Rose.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 6:15 pm • # 10 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
I'm only saying be very careful what is written into law. Words do make a huge difference.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 10/30/14 7:30 pm • # 11 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
lovely person. lovely life. lovely death. thanks for posting.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 11 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.