It is currently 04/16/25 5:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next   Page 5 of 14   [ 350 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/24/17 8:10 am • # 101 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
"... a curious choice" is a good way to describe this ~ :ey ~ emphasis/bolding below is mine, and there are "live links" to more/corroborating information in the original ~ Sooz

Russia scandal reaches new level: Donald Trump lawyers up
05/24/17 08:00 AM
By Steve Benen

When a political scandal grows more serious, and powerful officials grow anxious about the direction of an ongoing investigation, we tend to reach the “lawyer up” phase: the point at which the powerful hire outside counsel to represent their interests.


In the Russia scandal, Donald Trump has now reached this stage.

Quote:
President Donald Trump is expected to retain Marc Kasowitz as private attorney on matters related to the Russia investigation, sources familiar with the decision told NBC News Tuesday.

Kasowitz has represented Trump in the past. Fox Business and ABC News earlier reported that Trump was expected to retain Kasowitz in relation to the Russia investigation.

Note, Kasowitz will represent Trump as an individual. This is separate from the White House’s counsel’s office, currently led by Don McGahn, which oversees legal matters related to the presidency.

Kasowitz is a curious choice. The New York attorney does not, for example, have a background in constitutional or defense cases – whether the president will face specific legal allegations remains unclear – though he has represented Trump in a variety of civil cases, “including on his divorce records, real estate transactions and allegations of fraud at Trump University.”

When Trump sued a New York Times reporter who wrote a book claiming Trump isn’t actually a billionaire, it was Kasowitz who oversaw the doomed case. (Trump sued for $5 billion, but his case went nowhere.) When Trump was furious with the New York Times for publishing a piece about women who accused him of sexual misconduct, it was Kasowitz who sent an angry letter demanding a retraction. (There was no retraction.)

What’s more, as Rachel noted on last night’s show, the big high-profile case that Kasowitz has been involved with since Trump became president was representing … wait for it … Russia’s largest state-controlled bank, which is called Sperbank.

Now he’s leading Trump’s legal team on matters related to the Russia scandal.

To a certain extent, I’m a little surprised this news hasn’t already made a bigger splash. Imagine, for example, the hysteria that would’ve erupted if, at the height of the Republicans’ interest in the IRS pseudo-scandal, Barack Obama hired outside counsel to protect his personal legal interests.

The fact that Trump has now lawyered up is emblematic of the fact that the political world already accepts the fact that the Russia scandal is a major controversial and an existential threat to Trump’s presidency, and so observers take it as a given that he’d have to lawyer up sooner rather than later.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/russia-scandal-reaches-new-level-donald-trump-lawyers


Top
  
PostPosted: 05/24/17 1:55 pm • # 102 
From what I hear, the entire White House staff has lawyered up.


Top
  
PostPosted: 05/24/17 2:17 pm • # 103 
Soos, re: #101

I watched the video and early in, they show Bannon. He's looking near death.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/24/17 2:43 pm • # 104 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Sidartha wrote:
Soos, re: #101

I watched the video and early in, they show Bannon. He's looking near death.

I'm convinced he suffers from perpetual hangovers ~ :ey

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/24/17 6:56 pm • # 105 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann):

NEW VIDEO: Now Sessions found omitting Russian meetings on Security Clearance forms. When will Trump-Russia "break"?

https://t.co/PhcbCWBAjk


Top
  
PostPosted: 05/24/17 7:27 pm • # 106 
sooz06 wrote:
Sidartha wrote:
Soos, re: #101

I watched the video and early in, they show Bannon. He's looking near death.

I'm convinced he suffers from perpetual hangovers ~ :ey

Sooz


Back @ 2014, at a point where the Harper government was in a funk of continual scandal, a cabinet minister by the name of Jim Flaherty - Canada's Minister of Finance - would be seen in Parliament (on camera) and squirming in his seat. He looked terribly uncomfortable and everyone noticed. A couple weeks later - he succumbed to a condition he apparently was living with for years. In Bannon, I see the same look - a pale pall in his skin and sunken eyes - I call it "the look of death". I don't think he's long for this world and I doubt he's going to be up to the stress of this broadening investigation.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/25/17 9:20 am • # 107 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
This is from the other day ... but is loaded with context ~ there are a couple of "live links" to more/corroborating information in the original ~ Sooz

TPM EDITOR'S BLOG
Cover Up as Reality Show
By Josh Marshall Published May 23, 2017 9:12 am

Let me share a few more thoughts about yesterday evening’s breaking news about President Trump’s overtures to the head of the NSA and the Director of National Intelligence.

Given what we knew already, these new details cannot be terribly surprising. Indeed, they fit a clear pattern. But they show just how far-reaching, widespread and brazen President Trump was in trying to shut down the investigation into his campaign and Russia.

We know from Comey’s accounts that Trump repeatedly tried to get pledges of loyalty from Comey. He purportedly asked Comey privately to drop the investigation the day after he fired Flynn. Of course, Trump eventually fired Comey, by his own account over frustration with the Russian probe. Now we learn that after Comey’s March testimony in which the FBI Director first confirmed the existence of a collusion/coordination probe, Trump personally reached out to Admiral Rodgers at NSA and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats to push back against or dispute Comey’s revelation.

Both apparently politely demurred.

Some minor props here for Coats. The former Indiana Senator’s qualifications for this position were slim. He’s a career politician, not an intelligence professional, with the different political antennae and loyalties that go with being a career elected official. Unlike almost all the rest involved – Comey, Rodgers, et al., he’s in his position because of Trump. Yet he appears to have seen the overtures in the same light and similarly rebuffed Trump’s requests.

In many ways this is the most telling passage …

Quote:
In addition to the requests to Coats and Rogers, senior White House officials sounded out top intelligence officials about the possibility of intervening directly with Comey to encourage the FBI to drop its probe of Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, according to people familiar with the matter. The officials said the White House appeared uncertain about its power to influence the FBI.

“Can we ask him to shut down the investigation? Are you able to assist in this matter?” one official said of the line of questioning from the White House.

There’s a lot here.

It appears that Trump and his top advisors were increasingly concerned that they could not get through to Comey to drop the investigation. They then started reaching out to others in the intelligence community either to publicly rebut Comey’s statements or try to intervene with him directly.

First, let’s consider what appears to have been the extreme importance Trump and his advisors attached to ending the Flynn/Trump-Russia probes. We’re focused on the loyalty pledge and Comey’s ouster. But they apparently tried every means they could think of to shut down the probe, all of them widely inappropriate and others quite possibly illegal.

Second, look at Trump’s personal role. Even if a President or White House has decided to obstruct or shut down an investigation, this is not the way to execute the plan. Put in the most cynical possible way, the President should never have personally made these calls, implicating himself directly in the effort. These kinds of overtures are made by their advisors and hopefully with some ambiguity and thus deniability.

Nor should Trump have called these men, apparently in their offices, where they could write perhaps literally contemporaneous notes of the conversations. It’s hard to unwrap what measure of this was desperation, recklessness or Trump’s complete unfamiliarity and inability to understand that all of these men were not executives in a private company run by him but high level officials in a government in which the President is the dominant but by no means only power center.

To get our collective heads around this, we must take note of this complexity and yet keep it simple: The President desperately wants to shut down the Trump-Russia probe and is going to the wildest and riskiest lengths to end it. The unique dynamics of Trumpian psychology make it just plausible that rather than a consciousness of guilt or fear, he is driven here by a need to brook no opposition or a fear that any discussion of this issue detracts from his “legendary triumph” last November, as Turkish President Erdogan put it.

But there’s a more straightforward explanation, even for Trump: a consciousness of guilt, if not necessarily his than those close around him, whose transgressions would rub off on him. There is of course my “Mailer Standard” theory: that Trump actually doesn’t know what investigators will find but has every reason to think it won’t be good. Simple: President must end the investigation because he can’t allow them to find what’s there.

We’re far past any question of a cover-up or an attempt to kill the investigation. We have almost too much evidence, too many positive acts. It’s like Trump is still operating in a reality show, where every positive act is devoid of subtlety, infinitely direct so as to move the plot-line forward in the length of a single episode and ubiquitously recorded so we can see it all playing out before our eyes.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/cover-up-as-reality-show-clown-show


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/25/17 9:26 am • # 108 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
he loses a lot of cases.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/25/17 4:55 pm • # 109 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Well looky who's suspected in the web of deceit ~ anyone surprised? ~ :ey ~ Sooz

TPM LIVEWIRE
NBC News: Jared Kushner Under Scrutiny In Federal Probe Into Russian Meddling
By Esme Cribb Published May 25, 2017 6:41 pm

White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, who is President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, is under scrutiny by the FBI as part of its probe into potential collusion between members of Trump’s campaign and Russian officials, NBC News reported late Thursday.

Federal investigators believe Kushner has “significant information” relevant to the investigation, NBC News reported, citing multiple unnamed U.S. officials.

The report noted that Kushner is not necessarily a subject of the investigation or likely to face charges, and that it is unclear whether investigators have requested records from Kushner, as they have from Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort and ousted national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Kushner is considered “in a different category” from Manafort and Flynn, according to the report, although it is not clear what differentiates them.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jared-kushner-under-scrutiny-fbi-investigation


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/25/17 5:01 pm • # 110 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Quote:
Kushner is considered “in a different category” from Manafort and Flynn, according to the report, although it is not clear what differentiates them.


He's among those who never have to pay for their misdeeds... he's too wealthy to prosecute and toss in jail, if convicted. Kind like the Murrican version of a royal family.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/25/17 8:18 pm • # 111 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Sessions claims it wasn't Sessions' fault.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/26/17 8:13 am • # 112 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
shiftless2 wrote:
Sessions claims it wasn't Sessions' fault.


Lying is this administration's trademark.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/26/17 8:33 am • # 113 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
GOP strategist admits he colluded with Russian hackers to hurt Hillary Clinton, Democrats

http://www.salon.com/2017/05/25/gop-str ... democrats/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/26/17 5:24 pm • # 114 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
More late Friday MSN BREAKING NEWS ~ :eek ~ Sooz

"BREAKING NEWS: Washington Post: Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret channel to Kremlin. Story to come."

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/26/17 5:45 pm • # 115 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
I'm not sure if I'm loving or dreading these late Friday news dumps ~ :ey ~ haven't read thru this one yet ~ Sooz

Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin
The Washington Post / Ellen Nakashima, Adam Entous and Greg Miller / 20 mins ago

Jared Kushner and Russia’s ambassador to Washington discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel between Trump’s transition team and the Kremlin, using Russian diplomatic facilities in an apparent move to shield their pre-inauguration discussions from monitoring, according to U.S. officials briefed on intelligence reports.

Ambassador Sergei Kislyak reported to his superiors in Moscow that Kushner, then President-elect Trump’s son-in-law and confidant, made the proposal during a meeting on Dec. 1 or 2 at Trump Tower, according to intercepts of Russian communications that were reviewed by U.S. officials. Kislyak said Kushner suggested using Russian diplomatic facilities in the United States for the communications.

The meeting also was attended by Michael Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser.

The White House disclosed the fact of the meeting only in March, playing down its significance. But people familiar with the matter say the FBI now considers the encounter, as well as another meeting Kushner had with a Russian banker, to be of investigative interest.

Kislyak reportedly was taken aback by the suggestion of allowing an American to use Russian communications gear at its embassy or consulate — a proposal that would have carried security risks for Moscow as well as the Trump team.

Neither the meeting nor the communications of Americans involved were under U.S. surveillance, officials said.

The White House declined to comment. Robert Kelner, a lawyer for Flynn, declined to comment. The Russian embassy did not respond to requests for comment.

Russia at times feeds false information into communication streams it suspects are monitored as a way of sowing misinformation and confusion among U.S. analysts. But officials said that it’s unclear what Kislyak would have had to gain by falsely characterizing his contacts with Kushner to Moscow, particularly at a time when the Kremlin still saw the prospect of dramatically improved relations with Trump.

Kushner’s apparent interest in establishing a secret channel with Moscow, rather than rely on U.S. government systems, has added to the intrigue surrounding the Trump administration’s relationship with Russia.

To some officials, it also reflects a staggering naivete.

The FBI closely monitors the communications of Russian officials in the United States, and maintains near-constant surveillance of its diplomatic facilities. The National Security Agency monitors the communications of Russian officials overseas.

Current and former U.S. intelligence officials said that though Russian diplomats have secure means of communicating with Moscow, Kushner’s apparent request for access to such channels was extraordinary.

“How would he trust that the Russians wouldn’t leak it on their side?” said one former senior intelligence official. The FBI would know that a Trump transition official was going in and out of the embassy, which would cause “a great deal” of concern, he added. The entire idea, he said, “seems extremely naïve or absolutely crazy.”

The discussion of a secret channel adds to a broader pattern of efforts by Trump’s closest advisors to obscure their contacts with Russian counterparts. Trump’s first national security adviser, Flynn, was forced to resign after a series of false statements about his conversations with Kislyak. Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from matters related to the Russia investigation after it was revealed that he had failed to disclose his own meetings with Kislyak when asked during congressional testimony about any contact with Russians.

Kushner’s interactions with Russians — including Kislyak and an executive for a Russian bank under U.S. sanctions — were not acknowledged by the White House until they were exposed in media reports.

It is common for senior advisers of a newly elected president to be in contact with foreign leaders and officials. But new administrations are generally cautious in their handling of interactions with Moscow, which U.S. intelligence agencies have accused of waging an unprecedented campaign to interfere in last year’s presidential race and help elect Trump.

Obama administration officials say members of the Trump transition team never approached them about arranging a secure communications channel with their Russian contacts, possibly because of concerns about leaks.

The State Department, the White House National Security Council and U.S. intelligence agencies all have the ability to set up secure communications channels with foreign leaders, though doing so for a transition team would be unusual.

Trump’s advisers were similarly secretive about meetings with leaders from the United Arab Emirates. The Obama White House only learned that the crown prince of Abu Dhabi was flying to New York in December to see Kushner, Flynn and Steven Bannon, another top Trump adviser, because U.S. border agents in the UAE spotted the Emirate leader’s name on a flight manifest

Russia would also have had reasons of its own to reject such an overture from Kushner. Doing so would require Moscow to expose its most sophisticated communications capabilities — which are likely housed in highly secure locations at diplomatic compounds — to an American.

The Post was first alerted in mid-December to the meeting by an anonymous letter, which said, among other things, that Kushner had talked to Kislyak about setting up the communications channel. This week, officials, who reviewed the letter and spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence, said the portion about the secret channel was consistent with their understanding of events.

For instance, according to those officials and the letter, Kushner conveyed to the Russians that he was aware it would be politically sensitive to meet publicly, but it was necessary for the Trump team to be able to continue their communication with Russian government officials.

In addition to their discussion about setting up the communications channel, Kushner, Flynn and Kislyak also talked about arranging a meeting between a representative of Trump and a “Russian contact” in a third country whose name was not identified, according to the anonymous letter.

The Post reported in April that Erik Prince, the former founder of Blackwater private security firm and an informal adviser to the Trump transition team, met on Jan. 11 — nine days before Trump’s inauguration — in the Seychelles islands in the Indian Ocean with a representative of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/russian-ambassador-told-moscow-that-kushner-wanted-secret-communications-channel-with-kremlin/ar-BBBz51O?ocid=U145DHP


Top
  
PostPosted: 05/26/17 6:08 pm • # 116 
I think this is all going to be much worse than Watergate.

Much worse, bigly even.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/26/17 7:07 pm • # 117 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Jared Kushner's daddy if a convicted felon. The apple didn't fall far from the tree?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Kushner


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/26/17 7:42 pm • # 118 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Banker who met with Kushner has Putin ties

The Russian banker who met with Jared Kushner in December has ties to the Russian government and was appointed to his job by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017 ... te-dnt.cnn


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/27/17 6:31 am • # 119 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
This photo from my Facebook feed makes me think maybe we should start a pool on what it will take to make the right accept reality ~ :ey ~ Sooz

Image


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/27/17 6:46 am • # 120 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 06/18/16
Posts: 2164
Yep - that meme says it all. This seems to me to be a big revelation - it will be interesting to see how the republicans spin it. Personally, I am surprised by this breech - it seems inconceivable to me that this happened and is happening. It goes beyond anything I could have imagined.. It is despicable how republicans have traded their country, their integrity for power, and continue to do so. It also seems there is barely any among them who actually give a dam about democracy and the constitution. Sickening the whole lot of them, and the enablers most of all.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/27/17 9:15 am • # 121 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Karolinablue wrote:
Yep - that meme says it all. This seems to me to be a big revelation - it will be interesting to see how the republicans spin it. Personally, I am surprised by this breech - it seems inconceivable to me that this happened and is happening. It goes beyond anything I could have imagined.. It is despicable how republicans have traded their country, their integrity for power, and continue to do so. It also seems there is barely any among them who actually give a dam about democracy and the constitution. Sickening the whole lot of them, and the enablers most of all.

Very well said, KB ~ while I generally try to avoid using the word "hate", I'm in conflict over which I "hate" more ... the DiC or his enablers [which includes the entire GOP/TP/Freedom Caucus] ~ :ey

Sooz


Top
  
PostPosted: 05/27/17 9:29 am • # 122 
Look on the bright side. Instead of the Republican Congress and Senate having to go up against a Democrat president in the White House - they now have to knuckle under to a plutocrat in the Kremlin.

Isn't America great again, yet?


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/27/17 10:08 am • # 123 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
there is SO MUCH SMOKE here that it is unimaginable that something serious will NOT happen to this president or his staff.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/27/17 12:21 pm • # 124 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Image


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 05/27/17 2:10 pm • # 125 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
This reminds me of Spy vs Spy from the old Mad magazine.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next   Page 5 of 14   [ 350 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 148 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.