It is currently 09/27/24 4:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 04/01/15 9:19 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Speaking of "convoluted reasoning"! ~ :ey ~ Sooz

Kentucky governor defends gay marriage ban: Straight men can’t marry each other, either
Travis Gettys / 01 Apr 2015 ET

Kentucky’s Democratic governor offered convoluted reasoning to argue that the state’s ban on same-sex marriage did not discriminate against gay and lesbian couples.

Attorneys for Gov. Steve Beshear filed a brief last week with the U.S. Supreme arguing that Kentucky’s law was not discriminatory because straight people – not just LGBT people – could not marry a person of the same sex.

“Kentucky’s marriage laws treat homosexuals and heterosexuals the same and are facially neutral,” the lawyers argued in the filing. “Men and women, whether heterosexual or homosexual, are free to marry persons of the opposite sex under Kentucky law, and men and women, whether heterosexual or homosexual, cannot marry persons of the same sex under Kentucky law.”

The Louisville Courier-Journal reported that the argument was similar to one offered by the state of Virginia nearly 50 years ago defending its prohibition against interracial marriage.

That state’s lawyers argued at the time that the ban, which was also effective in Kentucky and 14 other states, was not discriminatory because white people could not marry black people – and vice versa.

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected that argument in the historic 1967 Loving v. Virginia case that struck down bans on interracial marriage.

A lawyer for the six gay couples challenging Kentucky’s ban on same-sex marriage called Beshear’s argument “absurd.”

“Kentucky is in essence saying that our clients are precluded from marriage entirely, unless they change their sexual orientation (or simply marry someone to whom they are not attracted),” said attorney Dan Cannon.

“It’s akin to passing a law banning all Catholic churches within city limits, and then saying it’s not discriminatory because you can still go to a Baptist church,” he added.

The case will be argued before the Supreme Court on April 28.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/04/kentucky-governor-defends-gay-marriage-ban-straight-men-cant-marry-each-other-either/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 04/01/15 9:56 am • # 2 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Toss the argument as having no merit.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 04/01/15 12:54 pm • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
it really does have no merit, unless you think that marriage has nothing to do with love and attraction.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 04/01/15 2:51 pm • # 4 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
macroscopic wrote:
it really does have no merit, unless you think that marriage has nothing to do with love and attraction.

Not to mention civil contractual obligations.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 4 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.