It is currently 04/19/24 1:06 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 10:55 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
When you least expect it, KARMA appears! ~ LOVE this! ~ :st ~ Sooz

WATCH: Google CEO forced to explain why Trump’s photo appears when you search for ‘idiot’
Brad Reed / 11 Dec 2018 at 11:37 ET

Image

A photo of President Donald Trump that shows up in a Google Images search for 'idiot' (Screen cap).

Google CEO Sundar Pichai on Tuesday found himself having to explain why his company’s search engine retrieves photos of President Donald Trump when a user enters in a search for the word “idiot.”

During a congressional hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) informed Pichai that Googling the word “idiot” at the moment brings up several images of the president. She then asked him to explain how that sort of thing could happen.

“We provide search today for any time you type in a keyword… we have gone out and stored copies of billions of pages in our index, and we take the keyword and match it against the pages and rank them based on over 200 signals,” Pichai replied. “Things like relevance, freshness, popularity, how other people are using it. And based on that, you know, at any given time, we try to find the best results for that query.”

Lofgren then jokingly asked Pichai if there was “a little man behind the curtain” secretly rigging search results against conservatives.

“We don’t manually intervene [in searches],” Pichai replied.

Watch the video below. [Video accessible via the end link or at https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... keZQLgTWPs]

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/12/watch-google-ceo-forced-explain-trumps-photo-appears-search-idiot/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 10:57 am • # 2 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
"miserable failure" worked for Dubya.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 11:12 am • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/22/09
Posts: 9530
I just Googled the meaning of "idiot" and it's synonyms. It seems to me the picture is appropriate.

"a stupid person.
synonyms:
fool, ass, halfwit, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, cretin, moron, imbecile, simpleton;"


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 11:15 am • # 4 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 04/05/09
Posts: 8047
Location: Tampa, Florida
jimwilliam wrote:
I just Googled the meaning of "idiot" and it's synonyms. It seems to me the picture is appropriate.

"a stupid person.
synonyms:
fool, ass, halfwit, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, cretin, moron, imbecile, simpleton;"

Check
check
check
check
check
check
check
check
check and
check.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 11:34 am • # 5 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
This could be why "idiot" search turns up Trump.
https://rwnofficial.com/anti-trump-acti ... billboard/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 11:38 am • # 6 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/22/09
Posts: 9530
oskar576 wrote:
This could be why "idiot" search turns up Trump.
https://rwnofficial.com/anti-trump-acti ... billboard/



Kind of ironic that the billboard beneath the one with Grabem's picture says _ "We Fix Credit."


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 2:40 pm • # 7 
Editorialist

Joined: 08/04/09
Posts: 660
I THINK THE ANSWER TO "WHY ARE THERE NO SUPPORTIVE RESPONSES TO REPUBLICAN PROPOSALS" IS EASY. THE ONLY POSITIVE RESPONSES WOULD COME FROM RIGHT-WING HATE MONGERS, WHO ARE IRRESPONSIBLE, AND POSSIBLY CAN'T READ, ONLY UNDERSTANDING HAND GESTURES.

THERE'S SO MANY RETREADS ON THE ASSERTION THAT EVERY NEWS SOURCE IS CONTROLLED BY THE LEFTEST, LIBERAL, GODLESS COMMUNISTS----GEE, LIKE THEY ARE SO REPRESENTATIVE OF THE POOR AND NEEDY---choke, gag --AND WE POOR, GODLY, GOODLY, BETTERLY, ULTRA AMERICANS ARE BEING JUST PUMMELED TO RICE PUDDING BY THEIR DEMOCRATS HATRED.

BY THE WAY, DOES ANYONE RECALL US GOING TO WAR TO TRY TO REPUBLICANIZE THE COUNTRIES WE INVADE??? SEEMS TO ME, ALL I'VE HEARD OF OUR MASS SLAUGHTER OF OTHER CULTURES IS WE WANT TO SAVE THEM BY "DEMOCRATIZING" THEM." SO, WHAT THE HELL'S WRONG WITH DEMOCRACY????

(SORRY. DIDN'T 'MEAN TO CARRY ON SO, BUT THEY TOOK MY RESTRAINTS OFF AND I GOT TO THE COMPUTER AND C-SPAN AND THEY'RE BREAKING DOWN THE DOOR NOW TO GIVE ME MY MEDS. LOVE YA. EMJOY)


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 2:44 pm • # 8 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Love your rants!


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/11/18 3:38 pm • # 9 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188
"Frothy" Santorum is now down to result #3. We need to get that back to the top. LOL


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/12/18 1:22 pm • # 10 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
In another thread earlier today, I posted "the GOP has effectively jumped off the cliff" ~ reading this commentary makes me "upgrade" that comment to "the GOP has effectively taken a running leap off the cliff with their partisan stupidity" ~ :ey ~ some "live links" in original ~ Sooz

Facing Google’s CEO, Republicans can’t shake their conspiracy theories
12/12/18 10:49 AM
By Steve Benen

When Google CEO Sundar Pichai agreed to testify before the House Judiciary Committee, it created an important opportunity for federal lawmakers to address a range of important issues with one of the tech industry’s biggest and most important giants.

Alas, the Republican majority blew it. NBC News reported overnight:

Quote:
After months of wrangling, members of Congress finally had Google CEO Sundar Pichai right where they wanted him on Tuesday – testifying in front of a House oversight committee.

But instead of data privacy, antitrust, the abuse of market power, China or any number of other crucial topics, partisanship in the form of Republican questions about political bias at Google dominated the House Judiciary session.

It’s a problem that so much of contemporary GOP politics is driven by baseless conspiracy theories. It’s a bigger problem that Republicans’ preoccupation with these baseless conspiracy theories ends up pushing aside real governing opportunities.

Slate highlighted some examples of House Republicans trying to offer proof of Google discriminating against conservatives – which turned out to be far funnier than the GOP members intended:

Quote:
In arguing that Google relies too heavily on “liberal” Wikipedia, Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert admitted that his staff was altering his own Wikipedia page every night for two weeks, only to be rebuffed by the site’s editors. (Wikipedia guidelines state that editing an employer’s page is a “conflict of interest.”)

Iowa Rep. Steve King, after issuing several stern threats to impose regulations on Google to deal with political bias, ended his time asking why his granddaughter had come across a profane meme featuring his picture while using an iPhone. Pichai responded, “Congressman, iPhone is made by a different company.”

Part of the problem is that too many members of Congress still struggle to understand rudimentary details about technology. In 2006, then-Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who chaired the Senate committee that oversaw tech legislation, complained, “I just the other day got, an internet was sent by my staff at 10 o’clock in the morning on Friday and I just got it yesterday.” It led him to famously complain that the internet is “a series of tubes.”

Yesterday’s House Judiciary Committee hearing suggested there’s been limited progress in the last 12 years.

And while that obviously matters, let’s also not forget that Republicans, apparently desperate to portray themselves as victims of powerful liberal forces, have spent much of the last two years claiming that tech giants – Google, Facebook, Twitter, et al – are hatching nefarious schemes intended to hurt the right. It’s why, a variety of GOP leaders, including Donald Trump, have raised the prospect of government regulation of search engines and social-media companies.

But when asked to present any kind of evidence to substantiate the claims, Republicans fail, repeatedly and spectacularly. They tried again yesterday, only to find themselves literally laughed at.

A Washington Post report on yesterday’s hearing added:

Quote:
Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) complained that when he googled the Republican health-care bill or the GOP tax cuts the first several pages listed negative articles. “How do you explain this apparent bias on Google’s part against conservative points of view, against conservative policies? Is it just the algorithm, or is there more happening there?” Chabot asked.

“Congressman, I understand the frustration of seeing negative news, and, you know, I see it on me,” Pichai offered. “What is important here is we use the robust methodology to reflect what is being said about any given topic at any particular time. And we try to do it objectively, using a set of rubrics. It is in our interest to make sure we reflect what’s happening out there in the best objective manner possible. I can commit to you, and I can assure you, we do it without regards to political ideology. Our algorithms have no notion of political sentiment in it.”

But Chabot wasn’t having it. He told Pichai that conservatives believe Google is “picking winners and losers in political discourse.”

“There’s a lot of people that think what I’m saying here is happening,” Chabot said.

But that’s not an argument. “A lot of people” believe absurd Republican conspiracy theories because Republicans keep peddling absurd conspiracy theories. There are “a lot of people” who believe all kinds of nonsense, but that doesn’t tell us anything about the merit of the underlying ideas.

GOP lawmakers had a chance to do meaningful work yesterday with the CEO of one of the nation’s most important companies, but they couldn’t get out of their own way.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/facing-googles-ceo-republicans-cant-shake-their-conspiracy-theories#break


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 10 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.