It is currently 05/11/24 1:58 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next   Page 11 of 14   [ 334 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 03/18/22 6:07 am • # 251 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Republican condemned for grilling child with appallingly invasive questions about their genitals
JOSH MILTON

Missouri senator Elaine Gannon grilled a 14-year-old on what genitals they have. (Screen captures via Twitter)

A Missouri Republican has been blasted by LGBT+ activists for probing a trans child with “invasive” questions about her genitalia.

During a Senate Education Committee hearing debating a bill to ban trans girls in school sports, senator Elaine Gannon quizzed a 14-year-old on what genitals they have.

Gannon, a former school gym coach who now represents the third district, used terms such as “he-she” throughout the 1 March meeting, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

She then took aim at Avery Jackson, who has become something of a poster child for trans rights after she graced the front cover of National Geographic in 2017.

In startling footage posted by the Human Rights Campaign Wednesday (16 March), Gannon can be seen grilling Avery about ...

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/03/16/m ... ne-gannon/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 03/21/22 1:53 pm • # 252 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
The Awful Cost of the GOP’s War on Trans Teens
It doesn’t matter if they don’t pass — bans on medical care for trans youth are already risking lives. Just look at Texas

ALEX MORRIS

L. remembers exactly what her son was wearing one winter evening nine years ago. She can still see every detail: the blue Angry Birds T-shirt, the black Bakugan hoodie unzipped down the front, the jeans that had once been bedazzled and that still faintly bore the heart-shaped pattern where the plastic jewels had been, the Dr. Who socks — one still on his foot, the other on his bedspread. And the belt. She remembers the belt most of all. It was white and bore images of M&M characters, green and red candies cavorting across its length. A child’s belt, almost a toy, really. It was with this belt that her son was attempting to hang himself from the ceiling fan in his bedroom. He was nine years old.

That evening kicked off a years-long journey on L.’s part to stabilize her son’s mental health. She immediately got him into counseling. She fretted that her divorce from her husband might have influenced the suicide attempt. Or bullying. Or the possibility that he was gay. “When I asked him why, all he could tell me was that he was broken and there was no way to fix this,” L. says. “He didn’t know how to express what was different.”

It wasn’t until four years later that L.’s son, who was assigned female at birth, came across a YouTube video of a kid his age talking about being trans and, as L. explains it, “he said it was like, ‘Oh, my God, there’s a word for me.’ ” He shared this news with his mother, and was soon peppering her with ...

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/cu ... e-1324451/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 03/24/22 1:29 pm • # 253 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
How to guarantee the kids will have the biggest Pride Week celebration ever

Texas AG Declares School District’s “Pride Week” Illegal



The Hill reports:

Quote:
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) said in a letter to the Austin Independent School District (AISD) this week that its Pride Week was “breaking state law.”

Paxton wrote Tuesday that by hosting pride week, the district “has, at best undertaken a week-long instructional effort in human sexuality without parental consent. Or, worse [the] district is cynically pushing a week-long indoctrination of [students] that not only fails to obtain parental consent, but subtly cuts parents out of the loop.”

The Texas AG also wrote that ...


https://www.joemygod.com/2022/03/texas- ... k-illegal/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 03/24/22 3:55 pm • # 254 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/05/10
Posts: 14091
I can just about guarantee you that any parent that feels "out of the loop" are ones that have never been involved in their child's school/education, and never volunteer in the classrooms. They only squawk when they see key words like "trans" or "sex", never really understanding what is going on and never, ever knowing how their children feel about the issues. Probably ultra-religious (in word, not deed), under educated, racist and bigoted.


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 03/26/22 2:20 pm • # 255 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
"Utah Governor Spencer Cox vetoed a bill banning trans girls from sports, citing the devastating effects such a ban would have on trans mental health, and how trans athletes should have the opportunity "to find friends and feel like they are part of something.”

Several Republicans also voted against the bill. However, anti-trans members of the state legislature have vowed to override the veto of the bill in a session today. We applaud those politicians who are taking a stand for trans youth, instead of politicizing trans lives to score points with voters through fear and bigotry, and hope the bill fails."


Utah governor vetoes transgender athlete bill, citing high suicide rates: ‘I want them to live’
On Friday, state lawmakers overrode the veto

By Anne Branigin

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox became the second Republican governor in the past week to veto a bill that would have barred transgender athletes from competing in girls’ sports, writing an impassioned letter to state GOP leaders on Tuesday explaining his decision.

Cox cited “fundamental flaws” in the legislation, known as H.B. 11. But chief among the governor’s concerns were the mental health impacts such a bill could have on transgender youths in the state, he wrote.

Cox’s decision to veto the bill highlights divisions within the Republican Party on the ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyl ... lete-veto/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/01/22 3:50 pm • # 256 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Way to go UN

Lesbian sex bans declared human rights violation by UN for the first time


https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/03/30/l ... irst-time/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/02/22 7:09 pm • # 257 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Eve Gascon makes 23 saves in first Major Junior win with the Olympiques

Goalie Eve Gascon became the first woman to lead her team to a Quebec Major Junior Hockey League (The Q) victory since Charline Labonté on February 10, 2000.

Gascon helped the Gatineau Olympiques defeat the Drummondville Voltigeurs 7-3 on Friday. Gascon made 23 saves in her second career start in the Courteau circuit.

Labonté was the last woman to play in the QMJHL before Gascon was given a start on March 19. Labonte played 26 games for the Acadie-Bathurst Titan in the 1999-2000 season and two games the following season.

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/eve-gascon- ... -1.5845680


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/03/22 6:26 am • # 258 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
A couple of years old but figured it belongs here

Stop Using Phony Science to Justify Transphobia
Actual research shows that sex is anything but binary

Simón(e) D Sun

Antiscientific sentiment bombards our politics, or so says the Intellectual Dark Web (IDW). Chief among these antiscientific sentiments, the IDW cites the rising visibility of transgender civil rights demands. To the IDW, trans people and their advocates are destroying the pillars of our society with such free-speech–suppressing, postmodern concepts as: “trans women are women,” “gender-neutral pronouns,” or “there are more than two genders.” Asserting “basic biology” will not be ignored, the IDW proclaims. “Facts don’t care about your feelings.”

The irony in all this is that these “protectors of enlightenment” are guilty of the very behavior this phrase derides. Though often dismissed as just a fringe internet movement, they espouse unscientific claims that have infected our politics and culture. Especially alarming is that these “intellectual” assertions are used by nonscientists to claim a scientific basis for ....

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/vo ... ansphobia/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/06/22 5:33 pm • # 259 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Quote:
Will Larkins
@ProudTwinkie
·
My school is currently “investigating” me about this piece because my history teacher doesn’t like it. bruh.


This Florida teen went viral for his lesson on the Stonewall riots
Will Larkins, a student at Winter Park High School, gave the lesson just days after Gov. DeSantis signed a controversial bill limiting LGBTQ discussion in schools into law


https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyl ... ry-lesson/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/06/22 6:12 pm • # 260 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Marjorie Taylor Greene gave her definition of a woman and it backfired spectacularly
Relentlessly transphobic far-right conspiracy theorist and sometimes congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has been met with ridicule and condemnation after defining women as the “weaker sex”.

LILI RUTAI

In a video being widely shared on social media, Greene can be heard saying: “We came from Adam’s rib. God created us with his hands. We may be the weaker sex, we are the weaker sex, but we are our partner’s, our husband’s wife.”

According to reports, Greene’s speech at the ...

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/04/06/m ... -backlash/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/08/22 2:19 pm • # 261 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Just in case you didn't already know this "lady" is a total whack job

Watch: Marjorie Taylor Greene Goes on Unhinged Anti-LGBTQ Rant Warning of the End of Our ‘Sick’ Civilization

David Badash

U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) delivered an unhinged, massively anti-LGBTQ attack on Friday, in an attempt to rev up her base with the latest far-right-wing outrage du jour. Like many Republicans, Greene has dug up old anti-gay tropes, fear-mongering lies about transgender people, and wrapped it all up in “concern” for the nation and its children.

One of the more stunning claims Greene made was that “Women are murdering and mutilating their own babies through the twin horrors of abortion and transgenderism.”

“Like you, I was shocked when I heard that Fox News had hired Bruce Jenner to be its newest female political contributor,” Greene begins. “We remember Jenner winning an Olympic gold in 1976, and from the front of the Wheaties box, but today, Jenner believes he is a woman. I’d love to know which female contributors were passed over, or perhaps even made redundant to clear space for Fox’s newest star transgender commentator.”

“For many of us it felt like the last day in women’s history,” she claimed.

Greene says she feels “disgust as ...

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.c ... ilization/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/09/22 11:05 am • # 262 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrat ... &ref=notif


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/09/22 3:16 pm • # 263 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
AOC Expertly Shreds GOP’s Obsession With Defining ‘Woman’ in Blunt Tweet
Evan Brechtel

The word "woman" is on the lips of a slew of conservative elected officials and media personalities. Is it because they finally came around to supporting the extension of the Violence Against Women Act? Nope. Is it cause they took steps to address the gender pay gap? Wrong.

It's actually because they're demanding that anyone with President Joe Biden's stamp of approval define the word "woman."

The trend started during the Senate Judiciary Committee's questioning of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson for her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was confirmed in a 53-47 floor vote this Thursday. During the committee hearing, far-right Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee demanded Judge Jackson define the word.

Jackson responded:

Quote:
"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there is a dispute about a definition, people make arguments and I look at the law and decide."

The effort for Fox News sound bites continued with far-right Congresswoman Lauren Boebert of Colorado, who demanded Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra define the terms "man" and "woman" in a recent ...

https://secondnexus.com/aoc-corporation ... fine-woman


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/12/22 6:45 am • # 264 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/18/22 5:40 am • # 265 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
About time ....

Doctor Who fans overjoyed as the Doctor confesses love for Yaz: ‘It’s the best thing in the world’
After endless teasing, Doctor Who has finally confirmed that the 13th Doctor and companion Yasmin Khan – known as Thasmin – are absolutely queer for each other.

LILY WAKEFIELD

Fans had been promised some “delicately” handled queer romance in the show’s Easter special episode on Sunday 17 April, titled “Legend of the Sea Devils“, after romantic tension between Yaz and the Doctor reached fever pitched throughout Jodie Whittaker’s era helming the show.

Luckily, Doctor Who show runner Chris Chibnall finally delivered in Whittaker’s penultimate episode in the role.

During the climax of the action, as the Doctor manically worked to ...

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/04/18/d ... ndip-gill/

Just an observation or two:

- First, the Doctor isn't human so this isn't really homosexuality;

- Second, the Doctor has been male in previous incarnations and has had female love interests then so why should things change just because she's now wearing a female body?


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/20/22 1:23 pm • # 266 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Moms for Liberty cry when ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill gets turned against heterosexual parents
Walter Einenkel

The American conservative “advocates for parental rights in schools” known as Moms for Liberty have been busy working on making sure your children are protected from things like critical race theory (CRT), and any talk about gender identities (and LGBTQ+ stuff). Florida’s transphobic and homophobic and childhood-phobic conservatives scored a big legislative victory in March when state legislators were able to pass the “Don’t Say Gay” bill through into law. Its official name is the “Parental Rights in Education” bill and while it technically never mentions the word “gay,” the bill is a pretty obvious overreach into the rights of entire swathes of the American public. As such, lawsuits are already being filed against the Sunshine state.

Moms for Liberty’s Twitter account posted what they are calling a letter template for rebellious teachers to send home in regard to the new legal guidelines they are now forced to deal with as a result of the general pig-headed phobias of people like Moms for Liberty. Writing “A teacher in Palm Beach County, FL shared this template with us. It is being shared among teachers to use for grades K-3. How do you feel about this? What will you do when this arrives home in your child’s backpack? Time to take a Stand,” the letter is a little slice of genius, and the responses to this conservative freakout have been [takes a meditative breath] beautiful.

The letter serves to point out how, in its vague language, the bill’s authors have attempted to veil their bigotries and fears under the guise of parental rights. It does this by using the law’s truly banal purposes against the very parents who are pretending that this law isn’t very specifically about being homophobic and transphobic and queerphobic.

First the letter:
Quote:
Dear Florida parent/caretaker:

The Florida house of Representatives has recently ruled that “Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students.”

To be in accordance with this policy, I will no longer be referring to your student with gendered pronouns. All students will be referred to as “The” or “them.” I will no longer use a gendered title such as “Mr.” or “Mrs.” or make any references to my husband/wife in the classroom. From now on I will be using the non-gendered title “Mx.”

Furthermore, I will be removing all books or instruction which refer to a person being a “mother,” “Father,” “husband” or “wife” as these are gender identities that also may allude to sexual orientation. Needless to say, all books which refer to a character as “he” or “She” will also be removed from the classroom. If you have any concerns about this policy, please feel free to contact your local congressperson.

Thank you, Mx. XXXXXXXXXX

Whether this is a real “template” being handed out to teachers who see the don’t say gay bill for what it really is or if this is just one of those great memes that has truly pressed these “Moms for Liberty’s” buttons does not matter. Bridget Ziegler, co-founder of Moms for Liberty, Fox News talking face, and precinct committeewoman for the Republican Party of Sarasota County retweeted the letter, writing, “Once again, it’s unfortunate our students and their education are being hijacked by the Left’s culture wars. Thank goodness more educators, many whom are parents of young children, are speaking up and pushing back!”

The responses have been wonderful.

Continued>

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2022/4/1 ... al-parents


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/21/22 7:07 am • # 267 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Keep your pets away from Ted Cruz - and you most definitely do not want to see his Pornhub search history

Ted Cruz brutally mocked after saying Disney will soon show Mickey Mouse having sex with Pluto

LILY WAKEFIELD

Ted Cruz is being relentlessly mocked after insisting Disney will soon show Mickey Mouse having gay sex with Pluto in “every episode”.

The Texas senator hit out at Disney’s eventual opposition to Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill, which bans the discussion of LGBT+ topics in classrooms, while filming an episode of his live Verdict with Ted Cruz podcast at the University of Alabama.

During the podcast, Cruz was asked whether he thought that it was “appropriate to call someone a groomer if they are trying to teach sexual material to young children”.

While Cruz admitted that the word “groomer” should be reserved for “predators who commit horrific acts”, he added that there is “an effort from the left to sexualise everything”.

The audience then got an insight into Cruz’s thoughts that they definitely didn’t ask for.

He continued: “I think there are people who are misguided, trying to drive, you know, Disney stepping in, saying, you know, in every episode now they’re gonna have, you know, Mickey and Pluto going at it. Like, really?

“It’s just like, come on guys, these are kids, and you know, you could always ...

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/04/20/t ... x-florida/


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/21/22 9:53 am • # 268 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Maybe Disney should threaten to leave Florida.


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/21/22 10:39 am • # 269 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
Disney can't exactly pick up their toys and go home. Disney hires thousands of performers. The percentage of performers who are gay is higher than the percentage of gay people in the general population. Disney will face a staff shortage if the atmosphere for their present and potential employees causes them to seek work elsewhere. Disney will lose customers and money if they cannot staff their attractions. If Disney loses money, Florida loses money. Disney is Florida's largest employer. In addition, Disney cruise lines is based in Florida- they could potentially leave.
Florida is unprepared to provide even the most basic fire, police, and EMS services to Disney. Imagine the two counties that would absorb the area even trying to begin taking over the trash collection. Disney also has a very large wildlife management system. You can't have alligators, snakes, and venomous spiders running around the hotels and theme parks.
Disney recently expanded the Wide World of Sports adding a cheerleading venue. They host the Cheerleading World Championships ( this weekend) and various other cheer and dance competitions throughout the year. There is a large gay population in that community.
Additionally, there is a huge tourist economy driven by the existence of Disney. The other attractions and theme parks around central Florida depend on Disney for their draw. All of the hotels and hotel staff that would be out of jobs is staggering.
The economic losses will be significant, even if Disney just loses money as opposed to closing or failing.
Disney will prevail, and if Disney wins, Florida wins. If Disney loses, well Florida may just become a swamp full of alligators surrounded by senior living communities.
This will be DeSantis's death knell. It is the stupidest thing ever done by a governor to hurt his state.


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/21/22 11:15 am • # 270 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
Disney has a special deal with the state and is sorta self-governing. If they lose that deal the surrounding counties are going to be faced with picking up a billion dollars of debt.


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/27/22 5:04 pm • # 271 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 12/27/16
Posts: 10841
What It Really Means to Believe ‘Biological Sex Is Real’
It’s not what you think

Katelyn Burns

Anti-trans activists, influencers, and journalists often seek to make their views more palatable to “normies” who may not be up to date on the grinding, seething minutiae of the online gender discourse by framing their views as much more innocent than they really are.

A prime example of this is the claim that transphobes, meaning those who seek to roll back trans rights or otherwise harm trans people through official policy, will often claim that they merely “believe that biological sex is real,” and are thus persecuted for that view. But this is overly simplistic and hides the sinister undertone that their beliefs carry.

Nobody really believes that “biological sex” isn’t real. I’ve been accused of being one of the most “radical” trans activists on the interwebs, despite being a journalist and not an activist, and even I don’t believe that biological sex isn’t real. I can see it in ...

https://gen.medium.com/what-it-really-m ... 6f5e602659


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/29/22 7:15 am • # 272 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 05/05/10
Posts: 14091
I know I'll probably get slapped down for this, but here goes. When I originally posted about the they/them thing, I was chastised. This is even more confusing and a little daunting. The newest initialism for anyone outside of the boy/girl, he/her, heterosexual mold. 2SLGBTQ+ (two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning) I has to look up 2 spirit. I am not trying to be mean spirited, but this group of people wants everyone to embrace their differences. To label oneself seems more divisive. I don't care about anyone's sexual orientation. Character matters more. I'm not talking about all the legal ramifications regarding bathrooms or hiring practices et al. Just in general. I really don't know how to say this any better. Someone please explain it to me. That initialism looks like something Elon Musk would name his child or some sort of string theory equation. Need to be simplified, imo.


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/29/22 8:15 am • # 273 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
roseanne wrote:
I know I'll probably get slapped down for this, but here goes. When I originally posted about the they/them thing, I was chastised. This is even more confusing and a little daunting. The newest initialism for anyone outside of the boy/girl, he/her, heterosexual mold. 2SLGBTQ+ (two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning) I has to look up 2 spirit. I am not trying to be mean spirited, but this group of people wants everyone to embrace their differences. To label oneself seems more divisive. I don't care about anyone's sexual orientation. Character matters more. I'm not talking about all the legal ramifications regarding bathrooms or hiring practices et al. Just in general. I really don't know how to say this any better. Someone please explain it to me. That initialism looks like something Elon Musk would name his child or some sort of string theory equation. Need to be simplified, imo.


I've gotten the the point where I don't give a shite.


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/29/22 10:21 am • # 274 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
It does seem like always announcing your gender orientation has become more limiting than freeing. If everyone just treated all people respectfully pronouns would not be so limiting.


Top
  
 Offline
 Post subject: Re: Elliot Page
PostPosted: 04/29/22 2:01 pm • # 275 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188
roseanne wrote:
I know I'll probably get slapped down for this, but here goes. When I originally posted about the they/them thing, I was chastised. This is even more confusing and a little daunting. The newest initialism for anyone outside of the boy/girl, he/her, heterosexual mold. 2SLGBTQ+ (two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning) I has to look up 2 spirit. I am not trying to be mean spirited, but this group of people wants everyone to embrace their differences. To label oneself seems more divisive. I don't care about anyone's sexual orientation. Character matters more. I'm not talking about all the legal ramifications regarding bathrooms or hiring practices et al. Just in general. I really don't know how to say this any better. Someone please explain it to me. That initialism looks like something Elon Musk would name his child or some sort of string theory equation. Need to be simplified, imo.


People put all kinds of labels on themselves, so I don't really see a problem with adding more. Where you see "divisive", I see "defiant in the face of so much bigotry". Yes, character should matter more. But you know as well as I do that there are huge numbers of people who just lose their shit at the mere thought that "those people" exist at all.

So I think it's pretty bold and pretty brave to say "Here I am. This is me." and stand your ground. If nothing else, it does let people find out who really does accept them and who doesn't. Who IS willing to judge them on their character regardless of their sexuality, and who is going to judge them as "defective" simply because they aren't willing to hide who they are? I'd want to know.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next   Page 11 of 14   [ 334 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.