It is currently 06/25/24 10:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




  Page 1 of 1   [ 7 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/08/13 8:09 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
The 2d paragraph of the quote below explains why I find this interesting but not surprising ~ personally, I love Trader Joe's ~ even with its limitations, its "pros" far outweigh its "cons" ~ it's not really a "full service" grocery because it has limited fresh produce/meat/fish ~ but it has excellent frozen and generic products and a great wine selection, all at very good prices ~ and TJ's mindset and policies in employee treatment and benefits are the polar opposite of Walmart's ~ Sooz

Thursday, Feb 7, 2013 01:43 PM CST
There’s a reason more liberals shop at Trader Joe’s
New research shows that Conservatives tend to prefer the brand-name products of Walmart.
By Tom Jacobs

This piece originally appeared on Pacific Standard.

The cliché that liberals shop at Trader Joe’s, while conservatives prefer Walmart, is no doubt overstated. But where would the perception come from?

Newly published research provides a compelling answer: brand-name products. Conservatives gravitate toward them, and Walmart, unlike Trader Joe’s, is packed with them.

That provocative conclusion can be drawn from a study in the journal Psychological Science. A research team led by Vishal Singh of New York University’s Stern School of Business has discovered a relationship between voting behavior, high levels of religiosity, and “seemingly inconsequential product choices.”

They argue that your decision to vote for a certain candidate, and purchase a particular brand of detergent, springs from the same basic impulse:

Quote:
“Our empirical results, based on extensive field data, provide strong evidence that more conservative ideology is associated with higher reliance on established national brands (as opposed to generics) and a slower uptake of new products.”

“These tendencies are consistent with traits typically associated with conservatism, such as aversion to risk, skepticism about new experiences, and a general preference for tradition, convention, and the status quo.”

The researchers used a comprehensive database that tracks weekly store sales of thousands of products. Focusing on 416 counties which collectively represent 47 percent of the U.S. population, they calculated the market share of generics in 26 categories, including coffee, deodorant, and peanut butter.

Making similar county-to-county comparisons, they also calculated the market share of new products in the first year after their launch.

Using data from the Association of Religion Data Archives, the researchers determined the percentage of residents of each county who adhered to a particular faith. This was “strictly defined as the number of full members of a religious denomination, and the number of nonmembers who attend services regularly.”

Finally, to assess political affiliation, the researchers used the average percentage of Republican votes cast in the eight presidential elections between 1980 and 2008.

The results: In 19 of the 26 categories, greater religiosity was strongly associated with a lower market share for generic products. (The association was also found in another six categories, but at a level below statistical significance.) “We found essentially the same pattern in the associations between Republican voting and generics,” they write.

“Similarly,” they add, “the market share of new products was significantly lower in counties with higher levels of religiosity and Republican voting. Taken together, our results provide strong evidence that more conservative markets are associated with a higher reliance on established national brands and a lower penetration of new products.”

These findings are in line with recent research suggesting our ideological fault lines extend to surprising territory, including patterns of charitable giving. A study published last year provided evidence of literal differences between the brains of liberals and conservatives.

To follow up, Singh and his colleagues hope to explore differences in purchasing choices between individualistic, Western cultures and more collectivist, Eastern societies. While that will be interesting, they have already found a fascinating pattern within the U.S.

It seems ideological attitudes reveal themselves not only in the voting booth and the church pew, but also in the supermarket check-out lane.

http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/ever_wondered_why_conservatives_dont_like_trader_joes_partner/


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/08/13 8:21 am • # 2 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
Well that's silly. Why wouldn't conservative people want food that's more natural and less processed and tastes better at better prices? The largest super Walmart around here has several natural choices, but the regular Walmarts with groceries rarely have the natural versions of the name brands. Skippy has a natural peanut butter and Welches has a grape jelly without HFCS but they don't carry those at Walmart here. And Walmart can't touch the juice or cheese selection that TJs carries!


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/08/13 8:58 am • # 3 
Administrator

Joined: 01/16/16
Posts: 30003
Why wouldn't conservative people want food that's more natural and less processed and tastes better at better prices?

'Cuz that would mean a change in their boring lives.


Top
  
PostPosted: 02/08/13 11:48 am • # 4 
I have never heard of Trader Joe's so there must not be one around our area.
I am not sure I agree with this article though. Seems rather silly, IMO.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/08/13 12:21 pm • # 5 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
that dogmatics would also be brand loyal makes perfect sense to me.


Top
  
PostPosted: 02/08/13 3:04 pm • # 6 
One factor they should take into account is where the markets are located. I have to go to suburban Philadelphia to find a Trader Joe's. They are not omnipresent. Dee never heard of them, and i have never been to one. I might go there to shop if there was one here, but I am not going 40 miles to shop there.

Walmarts have more locations. I can travel 10 miles and shop there, and I chose not to.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 02/08/13 3:11 pm • # 7 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 3638
Location: The DMV (DC,MD,VA)
kathyk1024 wrote:
One factor they should take into account is where the markets are located. I have to go to suburban Philadelphia to find a Trader Joe's. They are not omnipresent. Dee never heard of them, and i have never been to one. I might go there to shop if there was one here, but I am not going 40 miles to shop there.

Walmarts have more locations. I can travel 10 miles and shop there, and I chose not to.


TJs is definitely a much smaller chain that Walmart. However it was only about 15 years ago when I lived closer to two TJs than to any Walmarts. Walmart was slow to move into the northeast.


Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

  Page 1 of 1   [ 7 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.