It is currently 04/04/25 11:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Go to page 1, 2  Next   Page 1 of 2   [ 35 posts ]
Author Message
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/16/09 6:25 am • # 1 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Anyone surprised? ~ I'm NOT ~ disgusted, yes ~ but surprised, NO ~ what a hateful, ugly man ~ there is a short videoclip at the end link that [again] I cannot get to stick ~ but it's worth seeing ~ Sooz


DECEMBER 3, 2009 8:42AM

Rush Limbaugh Says Poor Don't Deserve Healthcare

In a bizarre interview with William Shatner, on his show "Raw Nerve", Rush Limbaugh argued that there is no "morally superior aspect" to the question of the right to healthcare and suggested that it is entirely fair that if someone cannot afford healthcare, they should not have it.

Limbaugh unbelievably argued that poor people should have no more right to quality healthcare than they have to purchase "a house on the beach", arguing instead that they should have healthcare equivalent to the "bungalow" they would be able to afford.

For Limbaugh, the right to have one's health issues treated adequately, is a luxury and nothing more. If one is wealthy, then the luxury is within one's reach. If not, there's no moral reason whatsoever for society to provide any means to assist the underprivileged (or, middle class?) in affording quality health treatment.

The interview should once and for all seal Limbaugh's position as radical, callous and out of step with the 100% of the American population who believe they should have access to care when they need it. Limbaugh's view allows only for the wealthy to decide whether the poor should live or die.

The interview is shameful enough it should provoke responsible conservatives to disavow Limbaugh as a dangerous radical ideologue whose views seek nothing less than the eradication of the middle-class economy and the politics of fairness that are hallmarks of American democracy.

Whether or not they disavow Limbaugh will be a measure of their own humanity and commitment to the American people. It's time for us to cleanse our political discourse of the dismissive and hateful rhetoric of Mr. Limbaugh and the primitive urges he seeks to manipulate to his advantage.

http://open.salon.com/blog/je_robertson ... healthcare



Last edited by sooz06 on 12/16/09 6:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
PostPosted: 12/16/09 6:49 am • # 2 
Well this is a basic republican tenet. There is will always be poor people and it would be a waste of good hardworking peoples' dollars to help them out.

Ebeneezer Scrooge is their role model.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/16/09 7:33 am • # 3 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/16/09
Posts: 14234
the only problem with that perspective is that it is in open defiance of the preamble to the constitution, the UDHR, and the principles espoused by the founding fathers.

but i guess Rush is better than that. yo.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/16/09 9:53 am • # 4 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
Well, he answered a quesion that I asked in an earlier thread:


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/16/09 12:19 pm • # 5 

So, does the same go for feeding them, sheltering them, educating them and clothing them, too? Does Rush consider himself to be Christian? If so, he now stands as the most hypocritical I have ever heard.

The well being of the poorer in our society should never be dependent upon the generosity of the richer in our society. That's just not my United States. Is it what the founding fathers intended?



Top
  
PostPosted: 12/16/09 12:26 pm • # 6 
Rush Limbaugh is a knucklehead. You guys shouldn't listen to him so religiously. Image


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/16/09 12:45 pm • # 7 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
Odd you should say that, when I do listen to him I feel compelled to pray.


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/16/09 1:19 pm • # 8 
On the rare occasion that I come across his program, I say, "Jesus Christ!" as I cringe and change the station.


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/16/09 1:20 pm • # 9 
Of course, that's the same reaction I have to any of the "commentators" like O'Reilly, Olbermann, et. al.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/16/09 3:49 pm • # 10 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/04/09
Posts: 4072
On the rare occasion that I come across his program, I say, "Jesus Christ!" as I cringe and change the station.

Exactly, gop, that's precisely the prayer litany I use.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/16/09 7:36 pm • # 11 
Editorialist

Joined: 08/04/09
Posts: 660
It is an interesting comment for The Rush to make if one takes it through the progression from those with the mansion on the beach, to those with the cottage on the beach, to those with the tent in the swamps in the wetlands, to those who are homeless. We have first class health care and life protection and defense for those in the mansions. Then we have hospitals and clinics, perhaps for the cottage dwellers. Then we have the ER, or a pharmacists with bandaids and aspirin for those in the tents. Then we get to the homeless, the aged, the disabled, the children, who cannot work and, without SS and Housing Assistance, and SSI, and food stamps, have no way to live at all. What does the big mouth suggest for them.

Is there some mental shunt that permits these people who so oppose a "right" to health care (which seems quite closely aligned with something vaguely like "the right to life," that without health care people are going to die in larger numbers? And does it not seem logical that those who cannot afford health care also cannot afford to bury themselves? And that many who cannot afford health care cannot afford a place to live. And that there seems to be a likelihood that IF the alleged desires of those who oppose health care for the needy were to be actually met, in full, then there would be dead people laying all over the place? Is that really so difficult to understand? What else do they think will happen. Because people cannot afford health care they will just automatically get well? Do they see health care like some sort of an option chosen for the sake of privilege and comfort, just to have a "nicer life?" Health care is not a freaking option. It is necessary for life.

The world is no longer miles and miles of open land where neighbors live acres or miles apart. Large apartment buildings with thirty or forty dead bodies in them would be intolerable. Bodies sitting dead and rotting on the front steps of the hospitals and churches, park benches and bus stops would breed disease and certainly ruin the ambiance at the Sunday School picnic. If the alleged demands of those opposing health care are met on the grounds of economic entitlement, then there would be very unpleasant consequences for all of society. It would be inevitable. The sick will not disappear, and the rapture doesn't seem to be an assured solution.

The bright side is there would have to be some increased employment for those who are able bodied but unemployed. They will be needed to pick up the dead bodies and stack them out of the paths leading to the mansions on the beach. I really don't know if that's possible, as no one wants to pay any taxes for services to keep a community from becoming disease ridden, contaminated, poisoned, stripped of natural resources and beauty and filled with dead bodies.

Oh, dear. What's to be done. Oh, my, oh, my. How untidy those poor people are, just dropping down in their tracks and dying like that. And, wouldn't ya know, of course, they've made no provisions to have their rotting remains cleaned from our public places. Well, what can you expect when they couldn't even pay for their own health care. Really!!!!!

Now where are those pills? Oh, right there, next to the cigars. I'm tellin' you folks, this welfare from cradle to grave is just got to stop somewhere. And we can't stop filling up the cradles, so you can see that the grave thing is just going to have to find some other kind of final solution, isn't it? Mass graves, maybe. Maybe incineration? But still, somebody is gonna have to pick up the dead ones. Disgusting.

Somebody, please, write something and put it right upon Mr. Limbaugh's nose, or tattoo it inside his eyelids. The sick will die, and the dead will not have any more access to money than they did while alive. And the funeral directors rely upon insurance as well. If the poor haven't the money to pay for health insurance, they will not have money to pay for burial insurance. If they can't pay to have their remains removed, then either we learn to walk around mounds of dead bodies, or the STATE has to pay employees to pick up and dispose of the corpses. Mr. L. needs to carry through his blithering with consideration given to an actual train of thought, rather than a few hyped up phrases putting down poor people.

Keerist, what narrow vision that man has. It's a wonder he can find his way to the bathroom. Matter of fact, I'll be he can't. His level of vision probably requires him to pee his pants wherever and whenever the spirit moves him.

Yes, I know. I do ramble on, but so does he. And others are rambling on about the poor and their not having a "right" to medical care. So, okay. If that's true, then how do they propose to deal with the inevitable developments when sick people are absolutely denied medical care because they lack the money to pay for their lives? What do they propose as a future way to deal with the results?

jd


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 3:15 am • # 12 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 04/05/09
Posts: 8047
Location: Tampa, Florida
If that's true, then how do they propose to deal with the inevitable developments when sick people are absolutely denied medical care because they lack the money to pay for their lives? What do they propose as a future way to deal with the results?

That's where you go wrong. The poor always can sit for half a day in any ER to pick up their $80 Tylenol. Sure, if we would have access to Tylenol re-imported from Canada it would be only $60 per pill.


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/17/09 5:07 am • # 13 
Rush polls seven points lower than Rev. Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright and eight points below former Weather Underground domestic terrorist William Ayers.

Limbaugh is so unpopular that only 44 percent of Republican voters reported "warm" feelings toward him, ten points less than those who felt the same way about Limbaugh's top competitor, Fox News' Sean Hannity, and a full 20 points lower than Fox News itself.


http://www.thedailybeast.com


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 6:18 am • # 14 
Editorialist

Joined: 08/04/09
Posts: 660

Jabra,

The poor are often unable to make it to the nearest ER, and those who do, along with the "working class under/uninsured" are not always able to receive care in the ER at present. You comment is correct in that, at the present time, most States and locales have some sort of ordinance that requires them to treat the indigent. For years this has been the response of the anti-single payer, anti-health care for all, anti-health insurance reform groups and their supporters. "The poor get better medical care than the uninsured working class. The poor can go to the ER." That is NOT an acceptable solution, and it isn't even true in all circumstances. First of all, there has to be an ER available to the indigent. Don't find many ER's when you're living under an overpass or out in the woods in a tent, or at a truckstop in your car.

Times they are a-changin', and since we have come to this mangled health care reform where just about every element helpful to the uninsured has been removed and every element favorable to the health insurance industry has been enforced, we face, not a "brave new world," but a very ugly new world.

After listening to the discussions with Howard Dean and coming to the understanding (PLEASE, IF I HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD THIS, CORRECT ME! I WILL BE MOST GRATEFUL TO BE CORRECTED!) that the bill, as it now stands, will require citizens to buy insurance from an insurance company at an unregulated price, to acquire unregulated services, or they will be fined by the Federal government????? What is the "mandate" that small businesses or large businesses pay for health care benefits on employees? I am not hearing anything about that.

If it is not mandated that employers maintain insurance coverage on employees (and I don't see how it can be forced....any business who can't afford it will simply fold, increasing unemployed and uninsured) then why would employers provide health care benefits when they can stick it to the employees and the government.

The ER's are over crowded now, and extremely expensive to those government agencies at County, State and Federal levels that must end up paying for the uninsured who are often far sicker when they arrive at an ER than they would be if they had seen a GP or been able to go to a neighborhood clinic.

We are looking at the future in those cases where we are peeking through the little holes in the facade of our "Great and Compassionate and Functional Society." I spent time in the ER of Charity Hospital in New Orleans in the 1960's through the 1990's. I saw people die waiting for treatment more than once. I sat there with pneumonia for fourteen hours, with no money to even buy a cup of coffee. I sat there until I hoped I would die. I got told I had pneumonia and given a prescription, but I couldn't afford the prescription. So I went outside and sat down to wait to die. A kindly cab driver gave me a ride to my aunt's house and she called St. Vincent de Paul Society and they paid for the prescription. That was twenty years ago. Does anyone doubt that it is worse now????

So many people sitting in the waiting rooms and on the curbs outside where the ambulances pulled in just waiting, and someone falls down, and maybe someone helps pick them up and maybe nobody helps pick them up, and if they have a family member with them maybe someone cries out, or just cries. It is real. The isolated incidents that make the news are only the tip of the iceberg. It is NOT what the news media would have you believe, that the indigent just waltz into an ER and they are greeted with compassionate, top grade medical attention. The unemployment situation is going to increase the uninsured which will increase the already overburdened ER's. The uninsured are going to increase as the insurance companies get the gravy of mandated premiums while being given free reign to control what they will give for their self imposed premiums. People who scream about medical decisions being made by governmental bureaucrats under a universal, single payer health care system, don't seem to realize that medical decisions are being made by profit seeking, bean counting, economically trained corporate employees who do not see people at all, only numbers and dollars and cents.

CASES IN POINT

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19207050/

Edith Isabel Rodriguez, 43, died of a perforated bowel on May 9 at Martin Luther King Jr.-Harbor Hospital. Her death was ruled accidental by the Los Angeles County coroner's office.

Relatives said Rodriguez was bleeding from the mouth and writhing in pain for 45 minutes while she was at a hospital waiting area. Experts have said she could have survived had she been treated early enough.

http://newyorkcity.injuryboard.com/misc ... eid=275314

Joaquin Rivera, 63, of Frankford, walked two blocks from his home on Duffield Street to the emergency room of Atria Health's Frankford Campus in Northeast Philadelphia, where he checked in at 10:45 p.m. complaining of pain shooting from his left arm to his chest. He took a seat in the waiting room as a nurse instructed.

At 11:00 p.m., Richard Alten, 44, signed in for treatment at the emergency room and he, along with another man and woman companion, take a seat in the waiting room. The three conversed with Rivera.

According to witnesses, police believe Rivera lapsed into unconsciousness about an hour after checking in. All caught on the hospital's security video, one of the three people he had spoken with in the waiting room then removed Rivera's watch and briefly passed it to Alten. Alten was then called to see ER doctors and his companions left.

Around 11:45 p.m., a witness alerted hospital security that Rivera appeared to be dead and of the robbery.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2456592/actor_james_woods_emergency_room_treatment.html

Public Health Care Option, Emergency Room Treatment and Actor James Wood's Brothers Experience
James Woods' brother died in ER room awaiting care

Actor James Woods, according to the Journal Inquirer, Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009, settled a lawsuit with the Kent Memorial Hospital in Rhode Island, regarding his brother's death in their ER. "Michael Woods, 49, had a heart attack and died in the emergency room after going there with a sore throat and vomiting. James Wood claimed the hospital did not do enough to save him". The turning point in the lawsuit was when the Chief Executive, Sandra Coletta, met with the family and apologized. The hospital agreed to find ways to reduce human errors at the hospital and agreed to support Michael's children's education.


http://realchoice.blogspot.com/2009/08/1994-natural-abortion-leaves-young.html

Kris was in shock and suffering from disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. "She was bleeding from everywhere," said a doctor who treated her. "She was even bleeding from all the places she was pierced--her nose, her mouth, her brow, her labia. Everywhere."

Doctors suspected an ectopic pregnancy, but feared doing exploratory surgery because Kris's condition was so fragile. While they were just done with a CAT scan at around 9:00 Saturday morning, Kris went into cardiac arrest. Staff used a defibrillator several times in addition to multiple IV lines to revive her. After half an hour, her heart finally started beating again. But despite all the IV fluids, she still had no blood pressure.

In desperation, the doctors proceeded with surgery, finding an unruptured right tubal pregnancy that was bleeding from the end of the fallopian tube. The doctors removed the pregnancy and "significant quantity of old blood which was malodorous."

Even though the tube hadn't ruptured, it appeared that the effect of the pennyroyal on Kris's liver had caused the clotting problems that had led to her excessive internal bleeding.

After surgery, Kris showed no signs of responsiveness. She was declared brain dead on Sunday. Friends and family gathered at the hospital and life support was turned off. Half an hour later, at 4:51 p.m., Kris was declared dead.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOCpOZ4txvs

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/06/19/2009-06-19_two_kings_county_hospital_doctors_two_nurses_facing_charges_in_esmin_green_case.html

Kings County Hospital doctors, nurses facing charges in Esmin Green death-by-neglect case
By John Marzulli
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Friday, June 19th 2009, 11:43 AM
Related NewsArticlesFamily of woman left to die on psych ward floor settles for $2MKin of woman neglected at hosp sue cityHospital's 'dangerous' zoneFriends of woman left to die at hospital demand justiceKings' psych chief, security boss ousted over woman left on floor to dieMayor's fury over hospital shockerHospital video shows no one helped dying womanTwo doctors and two nurses are facing possible criminal charges for covering up the death-by-neglect of patient Esmin Green last year in the psychiatric ward at Kings County Hospital, the Daily News has learned.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crim ... z0ZxpzyjP2


(It might be noted that these newsworthy events seem to involve only folks who appear to be non-white. Among those I watched die in Charity Hospital's waiting room, were two white people who appeared to be "working middle class," folks. It is not only the great masses of unwashed poor that have washed up on our inviting "golden shores," lured by the lamplight who will die.)






Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 8:25 am • # 15 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 04/05/09
Posts: 8047
Location: Tampa, Florida
Jeanne, I'm afraid that you missed my sarcasm above, but that's all I have left after all those years on message boards and digesting the arguments of right.
Yes, I've had to visit our local ER once myself and I was disgusted with "the world's bestest health care system". Remember, I come from one of those socialist/communist/marxist countries with one of those cradle to grave social nets even for Mercedes/Porsche/BMW laborers.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 1:43 pm • # 16 
Editorialist

Joined: 08/04/09
Posts: 660
I didn't miss the sarcasm, but I misinterpreted it. Sorry. I don't have much left, myself, other than sarcasm, cynacism and utter disgust, served with a side order of frustration and topped with occasional suicidal urges. I have begun to understand The Man of La Mancha. I am glad I am old.

Thanks for clarifying. I'm sorry for my misunderstanding.

jd


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 2:07 pm • # 17 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188
Christ-I'm sitting here with health insurance and I still can't afford my required follow up care after all we paid for my surgery and whatnot earlier this year. I'm two months past when I should have had the additional work done, hoping nothing turns cancerous while we save up some $.

I guess Rush thinks I should just go ahead and die, too.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 2:32 pm • # 18 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 04/05/09
Posts: 8047
Location: Tampa, Florida
Go to the ER and pick up your Tylenol. Image


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 2:59 pm • # 19 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Chaos, please please please do not put off your follow-up treatment ~ both hospitals and docs will work out a payment program with you, especially if they know up-front ~ if it's not too personal a question, why won't your insurance cover the follow-up?

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 3:16 pm • # 20 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112
Jeanne, I'm not sure your information is correct ~ I'll see what specifics I can find ~ keep in mind Howard Dean is emotional and has a history of "exaggerating" ~ several very significant reforms HAVE survived ~ at least, as of today ~ including significant health insurance company regulation ~ take a look at the "The Progressive Case For Passing The Senate Health Bill" thread that I posted earier today ~ today's Progress Report from ThinkProgress fleshes out John Podesta's commentary, and I will post that in that same thread shortly ~ as disappointed as I am [and all 2-1/2 of my reps have been strong supporters of the both the public option AND the Medicare buy-in], I repeat that it was not realistic for us to think we'd go from the mess we're in today to perfection in just one step ~ but, again repeating myself, we have to start somewhere ~

Sooz


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 4:44 pm • # 21 
User avatar
Editorialist

Joined: 01/20/09
Posts: 8188
sooz08 wrote:
Chaos, please please please do not put off your follow-up treatment ~ both hospitals and docs will work out a payment program with you, especially if they know up-front ~ if it's not too personal a question, why won't your insurance cover the follow-up?

Sooz

After much ado and phone calls and paperwork and stress with the crappy new ins. co/plan hubby's boss picked, they will cover it, Sooz.
Just as soon as we spend $6,000 out of pocket first. Image

Even with payment plans, there's only so far you can stretch a budget. We're already squeezed as tight as we can go without falling behind. They're still sending us bills that date back to the stuff done in April! We've crunched the numbers, and with the need for the little luxuries like....oh....heating oil in winter, I may have to put this off 'till spring.lol Unless Santa leaves a big check under the tree or something.

It's crazy.

And jab- I actually brought my own tylenol with me when I went to the hospital to deliver my daughter. They won't LET you bring your own and take it. LMAO! (I did anyway.)





Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 4:58 pm • # 22 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 04/05/09
Posts: 8047
Location: Tampa, Florida
Uhmm, did I mention lately that my mother has never even seen a doctors or hospital bill during the last 80 years? Her co-payment is around 5 Euros per doctor's visit.
Serious surgery last year went fine after, I believe, 5 days waiting for a empty hospital bed, and to our surprise, she didn't even had to go in front of some socialist death panel. She wouldn't have a clue how much her universal health insurance paid for it.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/17/09 8:34 pm • # 23 
Editorialist

Joined: 08/04/09
Posts: 660
I am finding the same information that tells us good stuff but not the bad stuff. I need to get a clarification on the bad stuff.

It is after midnight and I am listening to Jeff Bingamen (sp) on Cspan discussing the mandated purchase of insurance by citizens who can find insurance for something like 9.8% of their income. I am paraphrasing what I understand him to be saying.

He, as I understand it, is saying that there will be people who cannot afford insurance for the 9.8?% of their income, and they will be subsidized. '

Okay, I got that. Sounds fair.

Then there will be, he says, people who will buy health insurance, whether it's subsidized or not, whether it's 9.8% or not, whether there is a penalty or not, but because it is the right and responsible thing for them to do.

Okay. I got that. Sounds nice.

Then, he says, there will be people who will chose to not buy insurance they figure that the penalty for not buying it will be something like $500. and a basic policy would likely cost them something like $3,000. so they will figure they'll pay the penalty and then if they need serious health treatment, they'll drop into the ER and expect to be treated.

Then, (so help me, he said something very close to this) "THEY JUST WON'T HAVE ANY INSURANCE AND THEY WON'T HAVE ANY WAY TO PAY FOR TREATMENT" ????????

What about the penalty they paid? They pay a penalty and then we just have the right to turn them away from medical treatment if they are in a car crash, or get attacked by a shark while swimming, or happen to be in a house that is flattened by a tornado? Who are we kidding here? If we're going to have to treat them in the ER anyway, that's just what we're doing now, so how is that "reform" or "covering more Americans?"

This is NOT clear to me. This makes NO civilized sense to me. This is unacceptable to me.

Then I read tonight--it may even be in the articles you posted--that this current bill will cause an alteration in the extra premiums that are being collected by those insurance companies that are engaging in the Medicare Advantage plans. The short version of this subject is that Obama said he was going to cut "funding" for Medicare, I believe the Medicare Advantage plans were highlighted .

Now, Obama, and Obama supporters, say, "Yes, he's cutting funding, but services will not be cut. He's going to be cutting out the wasteful spending that is going on in the Medicare Advantage plans. So, although it will have less funding, the services will remain the same." Of course, the opponents of Obama are saying "Obama is going to cut services to Medicare Advantage recipients." Who knows?

This is NOT clear to me, and I am on my State's mandated Medicare Advantage Plan because of preexisting, long term, incurable diseases, i.e. COPD and diabetes, plus heart disease, plus stroke. I cannot find anywhere where it is spelled out what changes are scheduled for the Medicare Advantage Plan, but I am fairly certain it is scheduled for a large portion of any of the spending cuts.

I don't particularly like the plan, as the insurance company uses me as a cash cow and, until I became openly and seriously hostile to their persistent phone calls, they kept trying to sell me products and services I did not need just so they could bill the government the exhorbitant fees to make their profits. In addition, such medical products as I did purchase from them initially were of poor quality and unknown origin. The blood pressure meter was unreliable (an unreturnable) as was the thermometer.

In addition to that, since my hostility became known to them, they have been erratic in sending payment, in many cases refusing to notify me of unpaid balances until three to six months after the treatment which makes me have to pay out of pocket. In other words, if one does not serve as a compliant cash cow to the insurance company, the Medicare Advantage Plan company to which I was assigned by my STATE, (I was shifted from my former Federally serviced Medicare and Medicaid) is more than willing to infllict economic damage and harrasing type stress upon a 74 year old survivor of heart surgery and stroke. I hate the damned thing. They all belong in jail. But, guess what. that's what happens when one "privatizes" a public service.

At the same time, even hating the plan, it is apparently all my particular State is going to permit me to have. Since I have Joe Wilson, Jim DeMint, and Lindsey Graham running my health care opportunities, if they don't get what they want, they can arrange for some more State's Rights arrangements that I probably will like even less.

Who has information on this "buy insurance or be penalized and be denied medical attention" mythology? threat? promise? hysteria? whatever?
I don't want to hear the "oh, don't pay attention to the details" people who are trying to put a good face on this disaster. and I don't want the tea baggers brewing up some "be very afraid tea." I cannot find any source that clarifies what IS going to happen with this buy it or be penalized discussion.

There are clailms that 31 million more people will be covered, but there are no claims that the insurance companies won't receive blackmail type increases to cover them. The same for the reduction, or correction in the disparity for the cost of women's health insurance. I haven't heard of any "price controls" being placed on Insurance companies. So, how are those prices going to decrease unless the government pays them off. I haven't heard about how the elderly's premiums are going to go up, but, well, they would go up anyway, but maybe they won't go up quite so much. Is that because, once again the government (meaning you and me and all the other taxpayers) are going to be blackmailed by the Insurance companies for the money. Why am I not hearing about cost control, or price controls being put on the insurance companies. What kinds of regulations and requirements for honesty are left to use against HMO's. Last I heard, during the Bush Administration (I think, but it could have been Clinton's) Congress passed a law that an HMO could not be sued for damages by a patient. Is that still the case? I don't know if they can be held liable by the government for fraud, even....or even effen!

Why am I not hearing about being able to bargain for cheaper drugs?

Why am I hearing that the costs will go down, when it is obvious that they are going to go up.

This is doublespeak. Voodoo economics revisited.

Where is regulation? Where is excessive profits? Where is the waste from fraud by the insurance companies being handled.

If Nelson continues to hold out for the anti abortion amendment....would rather see the bill die an unnatural death than concede the point...and we permit the wording to remain in the bill and sign it into law, it is the key unlocking the door to throw out Roe v Wade. Abortion is a medical procedure and it is not only being decided by religious/political bureaucrats, it is being decided by the bean counters for profits as well. The religious politicals have sufficient power to threaten a loss of government business if the Insurance companies do not join in with banning abortions. Will the women who are dying from coat hanger abortions be permitted live saving emergency treatment? Or will we permit them to just bleed to death?

I have no information on what has happened to determine whether or not immigrants, legal or "un" are going to be permitted to buy into, with their own money, ANY health care plan. If they cannot buy into our health care system and the right wingers have their way, they cannot receive government subsidized medical treatment, tell me what's going to happen when a busload of fieldhands gets caught on a railroad track, or slide off the side of a road into a canal? What does the local EMT responders do? Let 'em lay where they fell?

I am too tired to write anymore. But there are questions unanswered, important questions. This is bill has been so dragged to death with petty bullshit and bickering, leaks and threats, promises and failures that I don't think anyone who should know the answers to these questions has had time to realize the questions might even exist.

I wanna know about the issues left hanging up in the air. Whether or not someone is going to pay for Viagra or cosmetic surgery, electric motor scooters or prostheses, are things that could be worked out later. But how to deal with accident victims, old people, abortion, immigrants, college students, rich people who delilberately plan on sucking off the system by not being insured, when the supplements are going to kick in for the working poor and the small businesses, and if the small businesses are going to be required to provide insurance and penalized or subsidized if they can't or won't, and who is going to determine when an individual or a business could but won't?

There are too many closet doors with strange noises coming from within. I truly don't think I have too much longer to worry about this mess, but I have four children and they have children. And I know people who aren't yet as old as me who are in dire need of medical care NOW, and they cannot afford it. They are friends. They are human beings. They don't deserve to be treated like broken down cars left to sit somewhere and rot and rust away until they are no longer recognizable as the loved and useful beings they are.

These are some of my questions. If I wasn't so tired, I could probably do another ten pages. (I know, you're thanking your lucky stars I'm tired. lol. Really, Sooz, I wanna be informed, and I just don't feel like the President, or his spokespeople, or our representatives and senators (of either party) are giving us open and honest information. I'm old. I am slower at thinking than I was twenty years ago, but I am not stupid. I can understand plain english and the answers to these questions should be available to everyone, but especially to the elderly whose lives depend upon the ethical qualities of those upon whom they must rely for their very lives. WE don't have a hell of a lot of time to wait to be informed on our limited choices, and we certainly can't make a "comeback" if the world falls on our heads. Our trains have already left the station.

jd


Top
  
PostPosted: 12/18/09 1:16 am • # 24 
Americans should be marching in the streets against the obstructionist REPUGNOCANT party in the Senate along with those other "Blue Dog Democruds" like LIEberman who seem to think they can have their limousine healthcare and the rest be damned. They should be forced to accept any healthcare they pass for the rest of the people and lose their gold-plated plans.


Top
  
 Offline
PostPosted: 12/18/09 2:07 am • # 25 
User avatar
Administrator

Joined: 11/07/08
Posts: 42112

Jeanne, you [and I and everyone else] have every reason to be concerned, scared, and pissed off ~ I have one foot out the door to go to our school's holiday program ~ I should be home around noon and will definitely see what info I can find ~

Sooz



Top
  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

Go to page 1, 2  Next   Page 1 of 2   [ 35 posts ] New Topic Add Reply

All times are UTC - 6 hours



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
© Voices or Choices.
All rights reserved.